The Effectiveness Of Students' Learning Motivation On Learning Outcomes Using The Reciprocal Teaching Learning Model

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v1i1.7

Authors

  • Affiana Muthik IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
  • Arif Muchyidin IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
  • Alif Ringga Persada IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon

Keywords:

Effectiveness, Reciprocal teaching, Motivation

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to see the effectiveness of students' learning motivation on learning outcomes using the reciprocal teaching-learning model. The method used in this research is quantitative. In this study, the instruments used are questionnaires and tests, where the independent and dependent variables will use a questionnaire, and learning outcomes will be measured using tests. At the same time, the test is used to determine whether there is a difference in scores before and after using the mathematical learning model and to determine students' learning outcomes. Based on the objectives of the research and discussion that have been adjusted in previous chapters regarding the effectiveness of the application of the reciprocal teaching-learning model on the learning motivation of students in class VIII in one of the MTs in Tegal, the following conclusions are obtained: student motivation in learning by using the model reciprocal teaching-learning on students' learning motivation. The students' motivation to learn mathematics in class VIII C received an average score of 74.84% for all indicators in the good category. On the learning outcomes of students in the experimental class, namely class VIII C, which at the time of learning using the reciprocal teaching-learning model, the average value of the class was 82.22. While in the control class, namely class VIII D, which uses conventional methods at the time of learning, the average score is 69.13. This shows that using reciprocal teaching-learning models can motivate students to learn and ultimately lead to improved learning outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

G. Ziegler and A. Loos, “Theoretical and Experimental Investigation on the Non-Synchronous Responses of Flexible-Rotor Uncentralised Squeeze Film Damper Bearings System.,” in Proceedings of the Mathematical Congress on 13th International Education, 2017, pp. 63–77.

Kusmaryono, “The Importance Of Mathematical Power In Mathematics Learning,” Int. Conf. Math. Sci. Educ., vol. ICMSE, no. 2014, pp. 35–40, 2014.

H. R. Maharani, “Creative Thinking In Mathematics : Are We Able To Solve Mathematical Problems In A Variety Of Way ?,” Int. Conf. Math. Sci. Educ. 2014, vol. 2014, no. Icmse, 2014.

A. H. Schoenfeld, “Learning to Think Mathematically: Problem Solving, Metacognition, and Sense Making in Mathematics (Reprint),” J. Educ., vol. 196, no. 2, pp. 1–38, 2016, doi: 10.1177/002205741619600202.

K. A. Gafoor and A. Kurukkan, “Why high school students feel mathematics difficult? An exploration of affective beliefs,” UGC Spons. Natl. Semin. Pedagog. Teach. Educ. Trends Challenges, no. August, pp. 1–6, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED560266.pdf.

A. A. Annarino, “The Teaching-Learning Process: A Systematic Instructional Strategy,” J. Phys. Educ. Recreat. Danc., vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 51–53, 1983, doi: 10.1080/07303084.1983.10629532.

N. J. Mourtos, “A Sustainable, Systematic Process for Continuous Programme Improvement,” Glob. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 191–204, 2006.

M. W. Metzler, “Using Systematic Analysis to Promote Teaching Skills in Physical Education,” Theme, pp. 29–33, 1986.

R. Mandaniyati and I. V. Sophya, “The Application of Question and Answer Method to Improve the Ability of Students Achievement,” BRITANIA J. English Teach., vol. 1, no. 2, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://journal.iainkudus.ac.id/index.php/Britania/article/view/7074/4221.

L. Darling-Hammond, “Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence,” Educ. Policy Anal. Arch., vol. 8, no. January 2015, 2000.

D. T. Conley and E. M. French, “Student ownership of learning as a key component of college readiness,” Am. Behav. Sci., vol. 58, no. 8, pp. 1018–1034, 2014, doi: 10.1177/0002764213515232.

Victoria Department of Education, HIGH IMPACT Excellence in Teaching and Learning Excellence in teaching and learning. Melbourne: Department of Education and Training, 2017.

L. Darling-Hammond, L. Flook, C. Cook-Harvey, B. Barron, and D. Osher, “Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development,” Appl. Dev. Sci., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 97–140, 2020, doi: 10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791.

C. Coman, L. G. Țîru, L. Meseșan-Schmitz, C. Stanciu, and M. C. Bularca, “Online teaching and learning in higher education during the coronavirus pandemic: Students’ perspective,” Sustain., vol. 12, no. 24, pp. 1–22, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su122410367.

T. Muthuprasad, S. Aiswarya, K. S. Aditya, and G. K. Jha, “Students’ perception and preference for online education in India during COVID -19 pandemic,” Soc. Sci. Humanit. Open, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 100101, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100101.

F. Bambaeeroo and N. Shokrpour, “The impact of the teachers’ non-verbal communication on success in teaching.,” J. Adv. Med. Educ. Prof., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 51–59, 2017, [Online]. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28367460%0Ahttp://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=PMC5346168.

E. Karadağ, “The factors effecting student achievement: Meta-analysis of empirical studies,” Factors Eff. Student Achiev. Meta-Analysis Empir. Stud., no. May 2017, pp. 1–337, 2017, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-56083-0.

H. Yanuarti and D. Rosmayanti, “the Relationship Between Students’ Motivation and Their Learning Achievement,” Proj. (Professional J. English Educ., vol. 1, no. 6, p. 783, 2019, doi: 10.22460/project.v1i6.p783-788.

C. S. Jen and B. C. S. Yong, “Secondary School Students’ Motivation and Achievement in Combined Science,” US China Educ. Rev. B, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 213–228, 2013.

“Impact of Motivation on Employees,” Int. J. Sci. Res., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1836–1839, 2016, doi: 10.21275/v5i2.nov161570.

H. Tohidi and M. M. Jabbari, “The effects of motivation in education,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 31, no. 2011, pp. 820–824, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.148.

R. McAllum, “Reciprocal Teaching: Critical Reflection on Practice.,” Kairaranga, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 26–35, 2014, doi: 10.54322/kairaranga.v15i1.183.

M. R. Ahmadi and A. P. Gilakjani, “Reciprocal teaching strategies and their impacts on English reading comprehension,” Theory Pract. Lang. Stud., vol. 2, no. 10, pp. 2053–2060, 2012, doi: 10.4304/tpls.2.10.2053-2060.

A. R. Rojabi, “Exploring Reciprocal Teaching Method on EFL Learners’ Reading Comprehension,” VELES Voices English Lang. Educ. Soc., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 132–142, 2021, doi: 10.29408/veles.v5i2.3860.

A. H. Rasyid, N. Djam, and A. Dassa, “The Implementation of Reciprocal Teaching Model at Grade 7 th of SMPN 7 Bulukumba,” vol. 611, no. ICoESM, pp. 6–10, 2021.

E. Erwanto, A. S. Maryatmi, and A. Budiyanto, “The Effects of Reciprocal Teaching Learning Strategy and Self efficacy on Learning Outcomes of Early Childhood (AUD) Mathematical Logic,” Al-Jabar J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 9, no. 1, p. 41, 2018, doi: 10.24042/ajpm.v9i1.2567.

A. J. Wulandary, H. Upu, and B. I. Sappaile, “The Influence of Reciprocal Teaching Model on Students ’ Critical Thinking Skills in Learning the Systems of Inequalities with Two Variables,” vol. 611, no. ICoESM, pp. 477–482, 2021.

N. Azizah, B. Usodo, D. Retno, and S. Saputro, “Teaching Materials based on Reciprocal Teaching to Improve Mathematical Communication Skills,” Int. J. Multicult. Multireligious Underst., vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 44–55, 2020.

R. Hidayah, S. Latifah, H. Komikesari, and I. Yusuf, “Reciprocal Teaching Learning: Is it Effective to Improve Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills and Scientific Process Skills?,” Indones. J. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 69–77, 2021, doi: 10.24042/ijsme.v4i1.8675.

A. Sandopa, A. Doyan, and J. Ardhuha, “The effect of reciprocal teaching-learning model on the mastery of physics concepts and creativity of senior high school,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 2165, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2165/1/012011.

J. Filgona, J. Sakiyo, D. M. Gwany, and A. U. Okoronka, “Motivation in Learning,” Asian J. Educ. Soc. Stud., no. September, pp. 16–37, 2020, doi: 10.9734/ajess/2020/v10i430273.

J. C. Turner and H. Patrick, “Motivational influences on student participation in classroom learning activities,” Teach. Coll. Rec., vol. 106, no. 9, pp. 1759–1785, 2004, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2004.00404.x.

E. Vero and E. Puka, “The Importance of Motivation in an Educational Environment,” Form. Insegn. XV, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 57–66, 2017.

L. Legault, “Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences,” Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences, no. November. Springer International Publishing AG, pp. 1–5, 2016, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8.

S. B. Djamarah, Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2002.

N. Sudjana, Dasar-dasar Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo, 2009.

Suyitno, Dasar-dasar dan proses pembelajran matematika 1. Semarang: UNNES, 2001.

N. Purwanto, Psikologi Pendidikan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2003.

Trianto, Model pembelajaran berorientasi kontrutivis. Jakarta: Pustaka Publisher, 2007.

Kusnandar, Pembelajaran Autentik(penilaian Belajar Peserta Didik Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013) Suatu Pendekatan Praktis. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2013.

Downloads

Published

2022-02-08

How to Cite

[1]
Affiana Muthik, A. Muchyidin, and Alif Ringga Persada, “The Effectiveness Of Students’ Learning Motivation On Learning Outcomes Using The Reciprocal Teaching Learning Model”, J.Gen.Educ.Humanit., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 21–30, Feb. 2022.

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022): February

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of General Education and Humanities (GEHU)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Most read articles by the same author(s)