Level of Student Satisfaction with the Performance of Electrochemical Analysis Practice Instructors

Moh Hayat; Arif Muchyidin; Udin Asrorudin

doi:10.58421/gehu.v4i1.399

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v4i1.399

Authors

Moh Hayat Politeknik AKA Bogor https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5245-466X
Arif Muchyidin UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1598-6928
Udin Asrorudin Politeknik AKA Bogor https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6569-9804

Keywords:

Academic services, Electrochemical analysis, Practical instructor, Quantitative analysis, Student satisfaction

Abstract

This study aims to analyze student satisfaction with instructors' performance in Electrochemical Analysis Practice at AKA Bogor Polytechnic. This study uses a quantitative approach with a survey method. Data was collected through a questionnaire based on the Likert scale, which was distributed to 23 students who had completed the course. Data analysis is carried out descriptively with frequency and percentage calculations, then converted into qualitative information. The study results showed that the overall level of student satisfaction was in the "good" category, with an average of 72.24%. The aspect of professionalism obtained the highest score (73.62%), while the aspect of practice implementation had the lowest score (69.56%). These results show that even though students are satisfied, there is room for improvement, especially in implementing practice. The main recommendations are developing technology-based teaching materials, improving laboratory equipment, and providing more comprehensive practical tutorials. This finding is expected to improve the quality of electrochemistry practicum learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Z. Liang et al., “Effects of electrophoresis buffer, electrophoresis time, and annealing temperature on the quality of SSR molecular detection in rice varieties,” Cogent Food Agric, vol. 9, no. 2, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1080/23311932.2023.2275414.

E. Kinoshita-Kikuta et al., “Characterization of constitutively hyperphosphorylated lamin A <i>in vivo</i> using Phos-tag SDS-PAGE,” Journal of Electrophoresis, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2024, doi: 10.2198/jelectroph.68.1.

W. Zhang, M. Zhou, H. Yue, D. Peng, X. Qiu, and J. Yang, “Effect of heat treatment on the microstructure, LBE corrosion resistance, and bonding strength of the FeCrAl‐based coatings,” Materials and Corrosion, vol. 75, no. 11, pp. 1406–1428, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1002/maco.202414331.

W. Wu and P. S. Lee, “Flexible and stretchable electrochromic displays: strategies, recent advances, and prospects,” Soft Science, vol. 4, no. 3, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.20517/ss.2024.21.

M. Hayat, T. A. Ivandini, E. Saepudin, and Y. Einaga, “Anodic stripping voltammetry of synthesized CdS nanoparticles at boron-doped diamond electrodes,” 2016, p. 020052. doi: 10.1063/1.4946955.

C. J. Fetrow, C. Carugati, X.-D. Zhou, and S. Wei, “Electrochemistry of metal-CO2 batteries: Opportunities and challenges,” Energy Storage Mater, vol. 45, pp. 911–933, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2021.12.035.

R. P. O’Hayre, “Fuel cells for electrochemical energy conversion,” EPJ Web Conf, vol. 148, p. 00013, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.1051/epjconf/201714800013.

E. C. Gugua, C. O. Ujah, C. O. Asadu, D. V. Von Kallon, and B. N. Ekwueme, “Electroplating in the modern era, improvements and challenges: A review,” Hybrid Advances, vol. 7, p. 100286, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.hybadv.2024.100286.

A. V. Bounegru and I. Bounegru, “Acrylamide in food products and the role of electrochemical biosensors in its detection: a comprehensive review,” Analytical Methods, vol. 16, no. 18, pp. 2824–2839, 2024, doi: 10.1039/D4AY00466C.

Z. Li and M. Zhu, “Detection of pollutants in water bodies: electrochemical detection or photo-electrochemical detection?,” Chemical Communications, vol. 56, no. 93, pp. 14541–14552, 2020, doi: 10.1039/D0CC05709F.

M. Hayat, E. Saepudin, Y. Einaga, and T. A. Ivandini, “CdS Nanoparticle-based Biosensor Development for Aflatoxin Determination,” International Journal of Technology, vol. 10, no. 4, p. 787, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.14716/ijtech.v10i4.2407.

R. Rahmawati, J. Permana, D. Nurdin, C. Triatna, and F. Fadhli, “Analysis of University Student Satisfaction Levels with the Learning Process on Five Dimensions of Service Quality (SERVQUAL),” AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 1944–1957, May 2023, doi: 10.35445/alishlah.v15i2.2355.

Kasidi, M. D. Satyarini, and S. Setyaningsih, “Analisis Kepuasan Mahasiswa Terhadap Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Daring,” Pawiyatan, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 30–36, 2023.

M. B. S Paly, “Tingkat Kepuasan Mahasiswa Terhadap Kinerja Proses Belajar Mengajar (PBM) Dosen,” Al-Hikmah, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 234–242, Dec. 2014, [Online]. Available: https://journal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/al_hikmah/article/view/380

E. Nuraini, “Kepuasan Mahasiswa Terhadap Layanan Bidang Kemahasiswaan,” Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan dan Ilmu Sosial, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 653–659, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.38035/jmpis.v3i2.1027.

N. Rahayu and Astuti, “Studi Deskriptif Kepuasan Mahasiswa terhadap Kinerja Lembaga Program Studi Manajemen Universitas Mataram,” Valid Jurnal Ilmiah, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 137–152, 2023.

D. Hanadya, N. U. Auliana, and M. B. Purwanto, “Kepuasan Mahasiswa Terhadap Pelayanan Sarana dan Prasarana Perpustakaan di Politeknik Darussalam Palembang,” Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbankan Syariah (JIMPA), vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 171–182, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.36908/jimpa.v2i1.61.

M. Yusa, A. S. F. Alqap, H. Helmizar, and N. Hidayati, “Analisis Tingkat Kepuasan Mahasiswa Terhadap Pelayanan Akademik di Fakultas Teknik Universitas Bengkulu,” Jurnal Bisnis Manajemen & Informatika, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 103–118, 2021.

E. Ermini, D. S. Nindiati, and M. Kurniawan, “Analisis Kepuasan Mahasiswa FKIP Atas Kualitas Layanan Akademik Di Pusat Pelayanan Terpadu Universitas PGRI Palembang,” Jurnal Media Wahana Ekonomika, vol. 18, no. 4, p. 468, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.31851/jmwe.v18i4.7441.

E. Kurniati and K. Kadarsih, “Mengukur Kepuasan Mahasiswa Terhadap Pelayanan BAAK AMIK AKMI Baturaja,” Jurnal Ilmiah Matrik, vol. 19, no. 3, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.33557/jurnalmatrik.v19i3.391.

N. H. Amba, U. John.O, and N. Cecilia. O, “Evaluating the Adequacy of laboratory facilities on students’ academic Performance in Secondary School in Calabar, Nigeria,” IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSRJRME), vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 11–14, 2014, doi: 10.9790/7388-04331114.

Purniawan and Sumarni, “Analisis Respon Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Daring di Masa Pandemi Covid 19,” in Seminar Nasional Pascasarjana 2020, Semarang: UNNES, 2020.

M. Waruwu, “Pendekatan Penelitian Pendidikan: Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Method),” Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 2896–2910, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.31004/jptam.v7i1.6187.

S. Arikunto, Prosedure Penelitian Suatu Pedekatan Praktik, 15th ed. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2014.

Pemerintah Indonesia, Undang - Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen. Indonesia, 2005. [Online]. Available: http://luk.staff.ugm.ac.id/atur/UU14-2005GuruDosen.pdf

M. Julian and A. S. W. Sumah, “Analysis of science laboratory facilities at Junior High School Bina Ilmi, Palembang City, Indonesia,” Jurnal Pijar Mipa, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 472–477, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.29303/jpm.v18i4.4813.

V. Tyurina, I. Hadiak, R. Naida, I. Hlazunova, and А. Olkhovska, “Improvement of Pedagogical Skills of Teachers of the Institution of Higher Education,” Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, vol. 11, no. 9, p. 49, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.5430/jct.v11n9p49.

T. A. Pranovcy, S. Hanafi, and D. Darmawan, “The Effect of Instructor Pedagogic Competency and Learning Motivation on Vocational Skills of Training Participants at BLK Cilegon City,” Equilibrium: Jurnal Pendidikan, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 215–221, May 2023, doi: 10.26618/equilibrium.v11i2.10554.

A. Juanda, D. Wahyudin, and Y. Z. Ansori, “Strategies To Improve Teachers’ Pedagogical Skills in Science Learning,” Asian Journal of Engineering, Social and Health, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 724–738, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.46799/ajesh.v3i4.291.

Level of Student Satisfaction with the Performance of Electrochemical Analysis Practice Instructors

DOI:

Authors

Keywords:

Abstract

Downloads

References

Downloads

Published

How to Cite

Issue

Section

License

Most read articles by the same author(s)

sidebar

Contact Us

Visitor Statistics