Student Problems In The Implementation Of The 2013 Curriculum With A Scientific Approach To Mathematics At MTs N 4 Cirebon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v1i2.16

Authors

  • Ismaniar Hikmatusholikhah SMP Nasyrul Ulum Gegesik, Cirebon
  • Jamali IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
  • Arif Muchyidin IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon

Keywords:

curriculum, scientific approach, qualitative approach

Abstract

This study aimed to explore student problems in implementing the 2013 curriculum with a scientific approach. This study uses a qualitative approach. Based on the results of the discussion, it can be concluded that the factors behind the VIII C grade students of MTs N 4 Cirebon related to the problem of not being able to respond to learning objectives with a scientific approach are: including internal factors, including; (1) lack of readiness to learn for each student, (2) at the stage of asking students are still shy and confused to ask questions related to material that has not been understood, and (3) at the stage of seeking information students feel confused to complete the questions/tasks given. Problems with external factors faced by students, including; (1) the way the teacher teaches that is felt to be in a hurry when delivering the material, (2) the lack of use of learning media by the teacher, and (3) the limitations of school facilities and infrastructure that are less supportive.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

K. Akbar, “Kurikulum 2013 dengan pendekatan Scientific dalam Pembelajaran Matematika,” Yogyakarta, 2015.

H. Warsono, Pembelajaran Aktif. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, 2012.

G. Chibiko Offorma, “Integrating components of culture in curriculum planning,” Int. J. Curric. Instr., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2016.

N. Mabwe, “Curriculum Design and Society ‘A Hand in Glove’ Relationship,” Int. J. Sci. Basic Appl. Res., vol. 24, pp. 207–220, 2015.

B. M. Mannong and O. Purwanti, “the Implementation 2013 Curriculum in Eltll: Scientific Approach and Authentic Assessment,” Expo. J. Pendidik. Bhs. Ingg., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 132–142, 2020, doi: 10.26618/exposure.v9i1.3542.

I. Marlissa and J. R. Untayana, “Implementation of 2013-Curriculum with a Scientific Approach at SMPN 2 Merauke,” in Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 2018, vol. 174, pp. 463–465, doi: 10.2991/ice-17.2018.98.

S. Suyanto, “The implementation of the scientific approach through 5ms of the revised curriculum 2013 in Indonesia,” Cakrawala Pendidik., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 22–29, 2018, doi: 10.21831/cp.v37i1.18719.

Yusmaniar, R. T. Sudrajat, and I. Mustika, “The Effectiveness of Learning to Write Explanation through a Scientific Approach Using Project-Based Learning,” Budapest Int. Res. Critics Institute-Journal, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 2717–2723, 2022.

E. S. Nara, Teori Belajar Dan Pembelajaran. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia, 2011.

M. Yaumi, Prinsip - Prinsip Desain Pembelajaran Disesuaikan Dengan Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group, 2014.

A. Muthik, A. Muchyidin, and A. R. Persada, “The Effectiveness Of Students’ Learning Motivation On Learning Outcomes Using The Reciprocal Teaching Learning Model,” J. Gen. Educ. Humanit., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 21–30, 2022.

I. S. Aminah, A. Muchyidin, and R. O. Akbar, “ARIAS Learning Model (Assurance, Relevance, Interest, Assessment, Satisfaction) And Their Effect on Madrasah Tsanawiyah Student Creativity,” J. Gen. Educ. Humanit., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 39–46, 2022.

A. T. Rahayu, A. Muchyidin, and B. Manfaat, “The Application of The Guided Note-Taking (GNT) Learning Method and its Effect on Student’s Understanding of Mathematics Concepts,” J. Gen. Educ. Humanit., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 12–20, 2022.

V. F. Falentina, A. Muchyidin, and T. S. Nasehudin, “Van Hiele’s Theory and Think Pair Share Cooperative Learning Model and Their Effect on Madrasah Tsanawiyah Student’s Level of Mathematical Thinking,” J. Gen. Educ. Humanit., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2022.

K. Sadiyah, A. Muchyidin, and N. Izzati, “Application of Collaborative Teamwork Learning Model and Guided Note Taking Model and Their Influence on Students ’ Ability to Understand Mathematical Concepts,” J. Math. Instr. Soc. Res. Opin. (MISRO, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 14–26, 2022.

Kosim, “Application Ability of Students in Integrated Computer-Aided Numerical Analysis Learning,” J. Math. Instr. Soc. Res. Opin. (MISRO, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 54–62, 2022.

J. Filgona, J. Sakiyo, D. M. Gwany, and A. U. Okoronka, “Motivation in Learning,” Asian J. Educ. Soc. Stud., no. September, pp. 16–37, 2020, doi: 10.9734/ajess/2020/v10i430273.

S. Hernawati S, “What Makes Effective Teaching in the 21 st Century,” 1st English Lang. Lit. Int. Conf., 2017, [Online]. Available: http://103.97.100.145/index.php/ELLIC/article/viewFile/2472/2498.

Y. D. Puspitarini and M. Hanif, “Using Learning Media to Increase Learning Motivation in Elementary School,” Anatol. J. Educ., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 53–60, 2019, doi: 10.29333/aje.2019.426a.

A. Wijaya, H. Retnawati, W. Setyaningrum, and Sugiman, “Diagnosing Students ’ Learning Difficulties in the E Yes,” J. Math. Educ., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 357–364, 2019.

M. Y. Alvarez, “Issues and Concerns of Teachers in Mindanao State University-Sulu Towards Modular Distance Learning Approach: An Analysis,” Indones. Community Empower. J., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 38–55, 2021, doi: 10.37275/icejournal.v1i2.8.

Y. W. Lin, C. L. Tseng, and P. J. Chiang, “The effect of blended learning in mathematics course,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 741–770, 2017, doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2017.00641a.

R. Bringula, J. J. Reguyal, D. D. Tan, and S. Ulfa, “Mathematics self-concept and challenges of learners in an online learning environment during COVID-19 pandemic,” Smart Learn. Environ., vol. 8, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1186/s40561-021-00168-5.

S. Setiyani, N. Fitriyani, and L. Sagita, “Improving student’s mathematical problem solving skills through Quizizz,” JRAMathEdu (Journal Res. Adv. Math. Educ., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 276–288, 2020, doi: 10.23917/jramathedu.v5i3.10696.

M. Y. Mazana, C. S. Montero, and R. O. Casmir, “Investigating Students’ Attitude towards Learning Mathematics,” Int. Electron. J. Math. Educ., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 207–231, 2018, doi: 10.29333/iejme/3997.

N. Nilamsari, “Memahami Studi Dokumen Dalam Penelitian Kualitatif,” Wacana, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 177–181, 2014.

J. Creswell, Riset Pendidikan, 1st ed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2015.

M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldana, Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, 3rd ed. Washington DC: SAGE Publications, Inc, 2014.

OECD, Education in Indonesia: Rising to the Challenge. OECD Publishing, 2015.

OECD, Creating Effective Teaching and Learning Environments First Results from TALIS. OECD Publishing, 2009.

E. Graf, Teaching and Learning in Digital World. Catalunya: Publicacions Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 2015.

Downloads

Published

2022-05-13

How to Cite

[1]
Ismaniar Hikmatusholikhah, Jamali, and A. Muchyidin, “Student Problems In The Implementation Of The 2013 Curriculum With A Scientific Approach To Mathematics At MTs N 4 Cirebon”, J.Gen.Educ.Humanit., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 61–70, May 2022.

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): May

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of General Education and Humanities

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Most read articles by the same author(s)