Misconception Analysis of Student Teacher Candidates Using Certainty of Response Index (CRI) and Interviews on the Subject of Calculus 1: Mapping by Gender

Fajar Gayuh Mulyani; Arif Muchyidin; Toheri

doi:10.58421/gehu.v1i2.17

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v1i2.17

Authors

Fajar Gayuh Mulyani IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
Arif Muchyidin IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
Toheri IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon

Keywords:

misconceptions, CRI, interviews

Abstract

This study aims to: 1) identify the misconceptions that occur in prospective students of mathematics teachers on the subject of calculus 1. 2) identify the misconceptions that occur in prospective students of mathematics teachers about the subject of calculus one based on gender. 3) find out the extent to which misconceptions occur in prospective mathematics teacher students on the subject of calculus 1. The research method used is descriptive with a quantitative approach. The population in this study were students majoring in mathematics education at one of the universities in Cirebon. The research instrument used was a written test in the form of essay questions accompanied by a confidence level column (CRI) and interviews. The results of the study found that the percentage of students who experienced misconceptions on the subject of calculus 1 with the limit function and derivative test material was 15.49% and smaller than the percentage of students who did not know the concept who got a rate of 42.76% and students who understood the concept well that is equal to 22.56%. The rest of the students who know the concept but are not sure get a percentage of 8.08%. While the percentage of misconceptions experienced by female students is 16.35%, for male students is 19.048%. The most common misconception among mathematics students is the concept of the derivative chain rules.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

E. M. Waluyo, A. Muchyidin, and H. Kusmanto, “Analysis of Students Misconception in Completing Mathematical Questions Using Certainty of Response Index ( CRI ),” Tadris J. Kegur. dan Ilmu Tarb., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 27–39, 2019, doi: 10.24042/tadris.v4i1.2988.

R. Istiyani, A. Muchyidin, and H. Raharjo, “Analysis of Student Misconception on Geometry Concepts Using Three-Tier Diagnostic Test,” J. Cakrawala Pendidik., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 223–236, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.21831/cp.v37i2.14493.

D. Rahmatina and N. M. Zaid, “Students’ misconceptions in interpreting the mean of the data presented in a bar graph,” Int. J. Insights Math. Teach., vol. 02, no. 1, pp. 57–74, 2019.

Y. Deringöl, “Misconceptions of primary school students about the subject of fractions,” Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 29–38, 2019, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v8i1.16290.

R. Ratnasari, “Students’ Errors and Misconceptions about Operations of Fractions in an Indonesian Primary School,” Southeast Asian Math. Educ. J., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 83–98, 2018, doi: 10.46517/seamej.v8i1.66.

H. Rafiah and A. Ekawati, “Misconceptions of the Students with High Mathematical Creative Thinking Level in Solving the Geometric Shapes Problems,” Adv. Soc. Sci. Educ. Humanit. Res., vol. 100, pp. 155–158, 2017, doi: 10.2991/seadric-17.2017.33.

A. Muthik, A. Muchyidin, and A. R. Persada, “The Effectiveness Of Students’ Learning Motivation On Learning Outcomes Using The Reciprocal Teaching Learning Model,” J. Gen. Educ. Humanit., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 21–30, 2022.

I. S. Aminah, A. Muchyidin, and R. O. Akbar, “ARIAS Learning Model (Assurance, Relevance, Interest, Assessment, Satisfaction) And Their Effect on Madrasah Tsanawiyah Student Creativity,” J. Gen. Educ. Humanit., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 39–46, 2022.

A. T. Rahayu, A. Muchyidin, and B. Manfaat, “The Application of The Guided Note-Taking (GNT) Learning Method and its Effect on Student’s Understanding of Mathematics Concepts,” J. Gen. Educ. Humanit., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 12–20, 2022.

V. F. Falentina, A. Muchyidin, and T. S. Nasehudin, “Van Hiele’s Theory and Think Pair Share Cooperative Learning Model and Their Effect on Madrasah Tsanawiyah Student’s Level of Mathematical Thinking,” J. Gen. Educ. Humanit., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2022.

Kosim, “Application Ability of Students in Integrated Computer-Aided Numerical Analysis Learning,” J. Math. Instr. Soc. Res. Opin. (MISRO, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 54–62, 2022.

K. Sadiyah, A. Muchyidin, and N. Izzati, “Application of Collaborative Teamwork Learning Model and Guided Note Taking Model and Their Influence on Students ’ Ability to Understand Mathematical Concepts,” J. Math. Instr. Soc. Res. Opin. (MISRO, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 14–26, 2022.

M. Taufiq, “Remediasi miskonsepsi mahasiswa calon guru fisika pada konsep gaya melalui penerapan model siklus belajar (Learning cycle) 5E,” J. Pendidik. IPA Indones., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 198–203, 2012, doi: 10.15294/jpii.v1i2.2139.

C. Roini and Sundari, “Using Certainty of Responses Index (CRI) for Assessment to Identify Graduate Students’ Misconceptions in Genetics,” in The 1st International Conference on Teaching and Learning 2, 2018, pp. 211–217, doi: 10.5220/0008899502110217.

F. H. Latif, Mursalin, T. J. Buhungo, and A. H. Odja, “Analysis of Students’ Misconceptions Using the Certainty of Response Index (CRI) on the Concept of Work and Energy in SMA Negeri 1 Gorontalo Utara After Online Learning,” Proc. 7th Int. Conf. Res. Implementation, Educ. Math. Sci. (ICRIEMS 2020), vol. 528, no. Icriems 2020, pp. 511–515, 2021, doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.210305.075.

N. REDDY, “International Journal of Innovative Research in Advanced Engineering,” Ijirae, vol. 4, no. 04, pp. 54–77, 2017.

Soeharto, B. Csapó, E. Sarimanah, F. I. Dewi, and T. Sabri, “A review of students’ common misconceptions in science and their diagnostic assessment tools,” J. Pendidik. IPA Indones., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 247–266, 2019, doi: 10.15294/jpii.v8i2.18649.

Surmaini, I. Syafe’I, and R. Diani, “An analysis of students’ physics misconceptions in online learning using the four-tier diagnostic test with certainty of response index (CRI),” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 1796, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1796/1/012099.

D. Alfiani, A. Muchyidin, and N. Izzati, “Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran SSCS (Search, Solve, Create, Share) Terhadap Miskonsepsi Siswa Pada Soal Matematika Bentuk Cerita,” Limacon J. Math. Educ., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 49–58, 2019.

Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2017.

M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldana, Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, 3rd ed. Washington DC: SAGE Publications, Inc, 2014.

T. A. Mustaqim, Zulfiani, and Y. Herlanti, “Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa dengan Menggunakan Metode Certainty of Response Index (CRI) pada Konsep Fotosintesis dan Respirasi Tumbuhan Tri Ade Mustaqim, Zulfiani, Yanti Herlanti,” Edusains, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 146–152, 2014.

R. Ramadhani, Hasanuddin, and Asiah, “Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa Pada Konsep Sistem Reproduksi Manusia Kelas XI IPA SMA Unggul Ali Hasjmy Kabupaten Aceh Besar,” J. Ilm. Mhs. Pendidik. Biol., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2016.

J. Huang, “Differences in the Performance of Female and Male Students: A Case Study of Second Language Learning,” Proc. 2021 Int. Conf. Educ. Lang. Art (ICELA 2021), vol. 637, no. Icela 2021, pp. 502–505, 2022, doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.220131.091.

M. Khaleel, “Female students are more likely to get higher grades than male students,” Int. J. Sci. Res. Publ., vol. 7, no. 3, p. 378, 2017, [Online]. Available: www.ijsrp.org.

E. Volchok, “Differences in the Performance of Male and Female Students in Partially Online Courses at a Community College,” Community Coll. J. Res. Pract., vol. 43, no. 12, pp. 904–920, 2019, doi: 10.1080/10668926.2018.1556134.