Analysis of Students' Misconceptions in The Exponential Numbers Material in Terms of Concept Understanding Through Four-Tier Diagnostic Tests Based on Gender

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v5i2.1071

Authors

Keywords:

Conceptual Understanding, Exponentiation, Four-tier Diagnostic Test, Gender, Misconceptions

Abstract

Misconceptions are a fundamental problem in mathematics learning because they can hinder students’ understanding of more advanced concepts, particularly in exponentiation. This study aims to describe students’ misconceptions in exponentiation material in terms of conceptual understanding using a four-tier diagnostic test stratified by gender. This research employed a descriptive, qualitative approach. The research subjects were eighth-grade students of SMP Negeri 31 Tanjung Jabung Timur in the odd semester of the 2025/2026 academic year, selected using purposive sampling, namely, students identified as experiencing misconceptions. The research instruments consisted of a four-tier diagnostic test equipped with the Certainty of Response Index (CRI) and semi-structured interview guidelines. Data were analysed by classifying students’ responses into the following categories: conceptual understanding, partial understanding, false understanding (positive and negative), misconceptions, and lack of conceptual understanding. The results showed that 23 of 38 students experienced misconceptions, with a higher proportion among male students than among female students. The identified misconceptions included generalisation, notation, overspecialization, and mathematical language. These findings indicate that gender differences influence students’ tendencies to experience misconceptions in exponentiation material. Therefore, the four-tier diagnostic test is effective for identifying misconceptions in depth and can serve as a basis for teachers to design more appropriate instructional strategies to reduce students’ misconceptions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Meldawati, M., & Kartini, K. (2021). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Kelas Vii Smp Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Pada Materi Bilangan Berpangkat Bulat Positif. AXIOM : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Matematika, 10(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.30821/axiom.v10i1.7681

Peni, N. R. N. (2025). Miskonsepsi dalam Pembelajaran Matematika: Tinjauan Literatur Pada Materi Eksponen. Polinomial: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(4), 902-912.

Kamid, Anwar, K., Syaiful, Sofnidar, Liani, L., & Kurniawan, W. (2020). Investigation into first-year college students’ misconceptions about limit concept: A case study based on cognitive style. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), 1445–1452. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080437

Kuserawati, A. A. (2025). Profil Tes Diagnostik Model Four Tier Diagnostic Test dalam Mengungkap Miskonsepsi pada Pembelajaran Matematika. Didaktika: Jurnal Kependidikan, 14(3 Agustus), 5425-5434.

Septiana, D., Fakhriyah, F., & Sulisyorini, S. (2026). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Kelas V Materi Ekosistem Menggunakan Four Tier Diagnostic Test. Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi, 3(1), 630-634.

Rawh, P., Samsudin, A., & Nugraha, M. G. (2020). Pengembangan Four-tier Diagnostic Test untuk Mengidentifikasi Profil Konsepsi Siswa pada Materi Alat-alat Optik. WaPFi (Wahana Pendidikan Fisika), 5(1), 84–89. https://doi.org/10.17509/wapfi.v5i1.22888

Purwaningsih, P., Masitah, M., Nasution, R., & Jailani, J. (2025). Analisis Miskonsepsi Biologi Berbasis Tes Diagnostik Four-Tier Multiple Choice Berbantuan Cri Pada Materi Perubahan Lingkungan Di SMA Negeri 3 Samarinda. Bioedukasi (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi), 16(1), 23-33.

Cahyanto, M. A. S., Ashadi, A., & Saputro, S. (2019). Pengembangan Two-Tier Multiple Choice Question Disertai Teknik CRI (Certainty of Response Index) Sebagai Instrumen Diagnostik Miskonsepsi. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Dan Saintek 2019, Isu-Isu Kontemporer Sains, Lingkungan, dan Inovasi Pembelajarannya, 194–198.

Kristyasari, M. L., & Pongkendek, J. J. (2023). Analysis of The Effect of Gender on High School Students’ Misconceptions. Journal of Educational Chemistry (JEC), 5(2), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.21580/jec.2023.5.2.14997

Rahmawati, S., Nurcahyono, N. A., & Balkist, P. S. (2024). Analisis Miskonsepsi Matematika Siswa Menggunakan Certainty of Response Index Ditinjau Dari Perbedaan Gender. Jurnal Educatio, 10(4), 1095–1101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v10i4.8746

Fauziyah, E. P. (2021). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Pada Pokok Bahasan Persamaan Kuadrat Ditinjau Dari Perbedaan Gender. SENANDIKA 2020, 2(1).

Satori, D., & Komariah, A. (2013). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Alfabeta.

Mekarisce, A. A. (2020). Teknik pemeriksaan keabsahan data pada penelitian kualitatif di bidang kesehatan masyarakat. Jurnal Ilmiah Kesehatan Masyarakat: Media Komunikasi Komunitas Kesehatan Masyarakat, 12(3), 145-151.

Suparno, P. (2013). Miskonsepsi & Perubahan Konsep dalam Pendidikan Fisika. Grasindo.

Driver, R. (1989). Students’ conceptions and the learning of science Students’ conceptions and the learning of science. International Journal of Science Education, 11(5), 481–490. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069890110501

Amir, Z. (2013). Perspektif Gender Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Marwah: Jurnal Perempuan, Agama Dan Jender, 12(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.24014/marwah.v12i1.511

Hasan, S., Bagayoko, D., & Kelley, E. L. (1999). Misconceptions and the certainty of response index (CRI). Physics Education, 34(5), 294–299. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/34/5/304

Arda, F. N., Pujiastuti, H., & Rafianti, I. (2023). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Menggunakan Four Tier Diagnostic Test. JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika), 12(1), 135. https://doi.org/10.25273/jipm.v12i1.11035

Sarlina. (2015). Miskonsepsi Siswa terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Matematika pada Pokok Bahasan Persamaan Kuadrat Siswa Kelas X5 SMA Negeri 11 Makassar. MaPan: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pembelajaran, 3(2), 194–209. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24252/mapan.2015v3n2a5

Nurkamilah, P., & Afriansyah, E. A. (2021). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Bilangan Berpangkat. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v10i1.818

Salsabila, T. N., Basir, M. A., & Ubaidah, N. (2024). Miskonsepsi Peserta Didik Pada Materi Bilangan Berpangkat. Differential: Journal on Mathematics Education, 2(2), 110–125. https://doi.org/10.32502/differential.v2i2.218

Lestari, I., Suendarti, M., & Liberna, H. (2025). Miskonsepsi Peserta Didik pada Pembelajaran dalam Mengkonstruksi Pengetahuan. Pembelajar, 9(1), 51-56.

Renner, J. W., Abraham, M. R., Grzybowski, E. B., & Marek, E. A. (1990). Understandings and misunderstandings of eighth graders of four physics concepts found in textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(1), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660270105

Viviana, D. (2022). Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik Three Tier Untuk Mengidentifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa Pada Materi Sifat-Sifat Eksponen (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas PGRI Semarang).

Juniawan, E. A. (2021). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Matematika Siswa Dyscalculia Dalam Menggunakan Konsep Matematis di Lihat Dari Kesalahan Menyelesaikan Soal Logaritma. Jurnal Multidisiplin Madani (MUDIMA), 1(3), 269-286.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2026-04-19

How to Cite

[1]
M. Zilfikri, K. Kamid, and E. Anggereini, “Analysis of Students’ Misconceptions in The Exponential Numbers Material in Terms of Concept Understanding Through Four-Tier Diagnostic Tests Based on Gender ”, J.Gen.Educ.Humanit., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 2745–2752, Apr. 2026.

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): April

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of General Education and Humanities

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Most read articles by the same author(s)