Development of Probing-Prompting Learning Model Assisted by Mathematics Learning Module to Improve Students' Motivation and Mathematics Learning Outcomes

Siti Nur Halimah; Nurma Izzati; Sirojudin Wahid

doi:10.58421/gehu.v1i3.26

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v1i3.26

Authors

Siti Nur Halimah IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
Nurma Izzati IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
Sirojudin Wahid IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon

Abstract

This study has the following objectives: 1) To determine the development of the probing-prompting learning model assisted by the mathematics learning module to increase students' motivation and mathematics learning outcomes, 2) To test the effectiveness of the probing-prompting learning model assisted by the mathematics learning module to increase motivation and learning outcomes in mathematics student. This type of research is an RnD (Research and Development) model using the 4-D method that Thiagarajan and Sammel developed, namely the Define, Design, Develop, and Disseminate stages. This research was conducted at SMPN 01 Banjarharjo with a sample of 64 students. Collected data in this study using several instruments, including implementing learning plans, tests, motivation, and student response questionnaires. The results that have been obtained from the research are: 1) the Probing-Prompting learning model assisted by the Learning Module, after being validated and tested, it shows that it is convenient in increasing student motivation and learning outcomes, 2) The application of the Probing-Prompting learning model assisted by the Learning Module, can be said to be effective with an increase that occurred in students' motivation and mathematics learning outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

M. Syah, Psikologi belajar, 15th ed. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2017.

S. Sebayang and T. Rajagukguk, “Pengaruh Pendidikan, Pelatihan dan Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Guru Di SD Dan SMP Swasta Budi Murni 3 Medan,” J. Ilmu Manaj. METHONOMIX, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 105–114, 2019.

K. C. Land, A. C. Michalos, and M. J. Sirgy, Handbook of social indicators and quality of life research, no. January 2012. 2012.

E. A. García, J. J. P. Fernández, A. G. García, and L. A. Martínez, Learning to be: The world of education today and tomorrow. Paris: UNESCO, 1972.

F. Idris, Z. Hassan, A. Ya’acob, S. K. Gill, and N. A. M. Awal, “The Role of Education in Shaping Youth’s National Identity,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 59, pp. 443–450, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.299.

D. Nambiar, S. Karki, D. Rahardiani, M. Putri, and K. Singh, Study on skills for the future in Indonesia, no. July. Oxford: Oxford Policy Management Limited, 2019.

ECLAC-UNESCO, “Education in the time of COVID-19,” Santiago, 2020.

United Nation, “Policy Brief: Education during COVID-19 and beyond,” 2020. doi: 10.24215/18509959.26.e12.

A. Abidah, H. N. Hidaayatullaah, R. M. Simamora, D. Fehabutar, and L. Mutakinati, “The Impact of Covid-19 to Indonesian Education and Its Relation to the Philosophy of ‘Merdeka Belajar,’” Stud. Philos. Sci. Educ., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 38–49, 2020, doi: 10.46627/sipose.v1i1.9.

N. Anglia, “Why is Education Important?,” 2020. https://www.nordangliaeducation.com/news/2020/03/06/why-is-education-important (accessed Sep. 23, 2022).

I. Nur’aena, B. Manfaat, and A. Muchyidin, “Development of Peer-Based Interaction Skills Assessment Instruments in Mathematics Learning Process in Class,” J. Math. Instr. Soc. Res. Opin., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 20–32, 2022.

Nasifah, A. Muchyidin, and M. A. Misri, “Analysis of the Geometric Thinking Stage of Madrasah Tsanawiyah Students Based on Van Hiele ’ s Theory,” J. Math. Instr. Soc. Res. Opin., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–10, 2022.

M. A. Hidayat, S. Z. Nikmah, and R. Nurfitriani, “Teacher Strategies in Learning during the Covid-19 Pandemic at Madrasah Ibdidaiyah Negeri (MIN) 2 Central Aceh,” Budapest Int. Res. Critics Institute-Journal, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 3465–3472, 2021.

M. D. Endedijk and L. H. Bronkhorst, “Students’ Learning Activities Within and Between the Contexts of Education and Work,” Vocat. Learn., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 289–311, 2014, doi: 10.1007/s12186-014-9116-x.

S. Sutarto, D. P. Sari, and I. Fathurrochman, “Teacher strategies in online learning to increase students’ interest in learning during COVID-19 pandemic,” J. Konseling dan Pendidik., vol. 8, no. 3, p. 129, 2020, doi: 10.29210/147800.

S. Wahab and M. Iskandar, “Teacher’s Performance to Maintain Students’ Learning Enthusiasm in the Online Learning Condition,” JELITA J. English Lang. Teach. Lit., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 34–44, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.stkipmb.ac.id/index.php/jelita/issue/view/8.

A. Ghufron and D. Hardiyanto, “The Quality of Learning in The Perspective of Learning as A System,” in YICEMAP, 2017, vol. 66, pp. 255–259, doi: 10.2991/yicemap-17.2017.43.

A. Susanto, Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar. Jakarta: Kencana, 2016.

A. Ahmad, “The Use of Probing-Prompting Learning Strategies to Improve Biology Learning Outcomes of Class XI IPA 3 Students at SMA Negeri 5 Kendari,” J. Biol. Sci. Educ., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 31–36, 2019.

R. N. Putri, T. Taufiqulloh, and E. Sulistianingsih, “The Effect of Probing – Prompting Technique on Reading Achievement,” Metathesis J. English Lang. Lit. Teach., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 11, 2020, doi: 10.31002/metathesis.v4i1.1699.

R. Indahwati, “Probing Prompting Technique to Improve Student’s Learning Outcomes in The Opportunity Materials,” J. DikMas J. Pendidik. Mat. dan Sains, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 34–41, 2022.

R. F. Fajar, “Probing-Prompting Learning in Teaching Speaking,” Expo. J. Pendidik. Bhs. Ingg., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 86–95, 2020, doi: 10.26618/exposure.v9i1.3481.

S. Marliasari and T. Okta, “Teaching Reading Comprehension by Using Probing- Prompting Learning Strategy to The Eighth Grade Students of SMPN 7 Palembang,” J. English Educ. Lit. Linguist., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–26, 2018.

D. P. Parmiti, I. G. Margunayasa, and N. K. Y. Citrawati, “The effect of the probing-prompting learning model assisted by portfolio assessment on science learning outcomes of 3rd grade students,” Int. J. Innov. Creat. Chang., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 96–111, 2020.

M. Iksan, A. Yahya, and R. Rosmita, “Probing prompting strategy to improve young learner’s speaking skills in Palopo city,” Englisia J. Lang. Educ. Humanit., vol. 8, no. 2, p. 54, 2021, doi: 10.22373/ej.v8i2.8255.

N. Awaliah and W. Sanusi, “The Comparison Between Probing Prompting Learning Model and Problem Based Learning Model on Grade VIII Students ’ Learning Achievement SMPN 1 Cempa,” in International Conference on Educational Studies in Mathematics (ICoESM 2021), 2021, vol. 611, no. ICoESM, pp. 308–312.

Wasniah, “Analysis of Structuralism and Religious Values in the Short Story Pengemis dan Shalawat Badar in the Anthology Short Story of Senyum Karyamin by Ahmad Tohari,” J. Gen. Educ. Humanit., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 31–38, 2022.

Suyatno, Menjelajah Pembelajaran Inovatif. Sidoarjo: Masmedia Buana Pustaka, 2009.

A. D. Sari and U. Suhendar, “Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Probing Prompting Untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Matematika Peserta Didik Kelas VIII F SMP Negeri 1 Babadan,” Edupedia, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 56–70, 2019.

E. Kumala and Mahdian, “Meningkatkan Keaktifan dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Melalui Model Pembelajaran Probing Prompting Pada Materi Hidrokarbon Kelas X Di SMA PGRI 6 Banjarmasin,” J. Inov. Pendidik. Sains, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 23–31, 2015.

Z. Arifin, Model Penelitian dan Pengembangan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2012.