ICT and Learning of Mathematics in Nigeria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58421/misro.v1i3.40Keywords:
ICT, Learning mathematics, Learning, MathematicsAbstract
This study empirically reviews ICT and mathematics learning in Nigeria through a systematic literature review. Relevant articles and journals were identified to examine international students' teaching and learning experiences. Research shows that even if teachers believe that students need to understand mathematics or that the use of ICT improves students' development, students still need to solve problems. It may indicate that They do not incorporate her ICT into math classes or use it in traditional ways to impart knowledge. Her effective use of ICT in mathematics education may lead to more learner-centered classroom practices. These changes are widely believed to impact mathematics teaching and to learn positively. For example, ICT can enrich students' mathematics learning experience, increase their interest in mathematics, and change their attitudes toward mathematics. With the proliferation of online e-teaching, flipped classrooms are becoming a new trend in digital learning. The study recommends that ICT tools be made available by all parties to teachers and students with appropriate Internet access to achieve solid academic performance in mathematics. Governments at all levels need to increase their budgets for education and ensure that the money allocated for education is entirely spent.
Downloads
References
M. Marfuah, D. Suryadi, T. Turmudi, A. Muchyidin, and G. Satriawati, “Perceptions of pre-service and in-service mathematics teachers on the mathematical link between matrices and vectors,” AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 2633, no. September, p. 030002, 2022, doi: 10.1063/5.0102263.
A. Muchyidin and N. Priatna, “Montessori method to stimulate mathematical communication skills in mild intellectual disability students,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, 2022, vol. 2577, no. 1, p. 20035.
F. Aladejana, “The Implications of ICT and NKS for Science Teaching: Whither Nigeria,” Complex Syst., vol. 17, pp. 113–124, 2007, Accessed: Nov. 21, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://content.wolfram.com/uploads/sites/13/2018/02/17-2-2.pdf.
MOESS, Teaching syllabus for mathematics. Accra: Ministry of Education, 2016.
K. Das, “Role of ICT for Better Mathematics Teaching,” Shanlax Int. J. Educ., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 19–28, 2019, doi: 10.34293/education.v7i4.641.
T-TEL, Theme 7: Assessing Trainee Teachers (Professional Development Guide for Tutors). Accra: Ministry of Education, Ghana, 2017.
AAU, Executive technology forum. Accra: Association of African University, 2017.
S. Gipson, Issues of ICT , School Reform and Learning- Centred School Design. Melbourne: National College for School Leadership, 2003.
R. Viennet and B. Pont, “Education Policy Implementation: A Literature Review and Proposed Framework. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 162.,” OECD Educ. Work. Pap., vol. 162, no. December, p. 63, 2017, [Online]. Available: www.oecd.org/edu/workingpapers.
J. Conrads et al., Digital Education Policies in Europe and Beyond, no. 10. 2017.
A. Foluke, “Analysis of the Impact of ICT on the Performance of Students in Secondary School, Oyo State,” Int. J. Res. Bus. Stud. Manag., vol. 4, no. 8, p. 23, 2017.
C. Li Luen Ching, “Competencies of trainee secondary school teachers in using common ICT tools and Office software packages and the implications for successful integration of ICT in the Mauritian education system,” Form. Prof. Rev. Sci. Int. en éducation, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 56–65, 2016.
M. Fisher, “Computer skills of initial teacher education students,” J. Inf. Techology Teach. Educ., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 109–123, 2000, doi: 10.1080/14759390000200075.
P. P. Reyes, “Computer Competency Level of Elementary Teachers of Southern Tabuk District-1,” Indian J. Sci. Technol., vol. 12, no. 44, 2019, doi: 10.17485/ijst/2019/v12i44/148270.
A. Sutton, M. Clowes, L. Preston, and A. Booth, “Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements,” Health Info. Libr. J., vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 202–222, 2019, doi: 10.1111/hir.12276.
M. Pautasso, “Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review,” PLOS, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 1–4, 2012, doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003149.
J. McCarney, “Effective models of staff development in ICT,” Eur. J. Teach. Educ., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 61–72, 2004, doi: 10.1080/0261976042000211801.
D. Moseley et al., “Ways forward with ICT: Effective pedagogy using Information and Communications Technology for Literacy and Numeracy in Primary Schools,” no. May 2014, p. 170, 1999, [Online]. Available: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED458652.pdf.
A. Muchyidin et al., “Mathematics curriculum for intellectual disabilities schools in Indonesia and abroad: Literature review,” AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 2633, no. September, p. 030036, 2022, doi: 10.1063/5.0102268.
D. S. Gray and N. Souter, “Secondary science teachers’ use of, and attitude towards ICT in Scotland,” Glasgow, 2003.
The Robert Gordon University Aberdeen, “Teachers ICT skills and knowledge needs,” 2004.
S. E. O. Aduwa-Ogiegbaen, “Nigerian Inservice Teachers’ Self-Assessment in Core Technology Competences and Their Professional Development Needs in ICT,” J. Comput. Teach. Educ., vol. 26, 2009, Accessed: Nov. 21, 2022. [Online]. Available: www.iste.org.
M. Helena Peralta and F. Albuquerque Costa, “Teachers’s competence and confidence regarding the use of ICT,” Educ. Sci. J., vol. 3, 2007.
C. Ayas, “An Examination of The Relationship Between The Integration of Technology Into Social Studies and Consructivist Pedagogies,” Turkish Online J. Educ. Technol., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1303–6521, 2006.
E. C. Papanastasiou, M. Zembylas, and C. Vrasidas, “Can computer use hurt science achievement? The USA results from PISA,” J. Sci. Educ. Technol., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 325–332, 2003.
T. J. Wu and Y. N. Tai, “Effects of multimedia information technology integrated Multi-Sensory instruction on students’ learning motivation and outcome,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1065–1074, 2016, doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2016.1552a.
M. Courtney, M. Karakus, Z. Ersozlu, and K. Nurumov, “The influence of ict use and related attitudes on students’ math and science performance: multilevel analyses of the last decade’s pisa surveys,” Large-Scale Assessments Educ., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–26, 2022, doi: 10.1186/s40536-022-00128-6.
N. J. Al-Zaidiyeen, L. L. Mei, and F. S. Fook, “Teachers’ Attitudes and Levels of Technology Use in Classrooms: The Case of Jordan Schools,” Int. Educ. Stud., vol. 3, no. 2, 2010, doi: 10.5539/ies.v3n2p211.
D.-D. M. Abante, “Teachers’ attitude towards work,” Int. J. Res. Stud. Educ., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 211–218, 2022, doi: 10.5861/ijrse.2022.214.
B. Eickelmann and M. Vennemann, “Teachers‘ attitudes and beliefs regarding ICT in teaching and learning in European countries,” Eur. Educ. Res. J., vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 733–761, 2017, doi: 10.1177/1474904117725899.
S. Prestridge, “The beliefs behind the teacher that influences their ICT practices,” Comput. Educ., vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 449–458, Jan. 2012, doi: 10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2011.08.028.
P. A. Ertmer, A. T. Ottenbreit-Leftwich, O. Sadik, E. Sendurur, and P. Sendurur, “Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship,” Comput. Educ., vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 423–435, Sep. 2012, doi: 10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2012.02.001.
S. Meggiolaro, “Information and communication technologies use, gender and mathematics achievement: evidence from Italy,” Soc. Psychol. Educ., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 497–516, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s11218-017-9425-7.
F. Saltan and K. Arslan, “A comparison of in-service and pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge self-confidence,” Cogent Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 1311501, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2017.1311501.
M. M. Bordalba and J. G. Bochaca, “Accesibilidad y alfabetización digital: Barreras para la integración de las TIC en la comunicación familia/escuela,” Rev. Investig. Educ., vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 239–257, 2018, doi: 10.6018/rie.36.1.290111.
Ö. Uslu, “Factors Associated with Technology Integration to Improve Instructional Abilities: A Path Model,” Aust. J. Teach. Educ., vol. 43, no. 4, 2018.
H. S. Hussain, R. Din, N. Z. Khidzir, K. A. M. Daud, and S. Ahmad, “Risk and Threat via Online Social Network among Academia at Higher Education,” 2017, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1018/1/012008.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Mathematics Instruction, Social Research and Opinion

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
















