Conceptualizing the Influence of Artificial Intelligence on Students’ Academic Integrity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58421/misro.v4i2.383Keywords:
artificial intelligence, Academic Integrity, AI Impact, Technology Acceptance Model, Research EthicsAbstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has evolved into an indispensable tool in education. AI usage in education permeates tutoring systems, automated essay scoring, plagiarism detection, virtual reality simulations, and chatbot-based learning support. This ubiquity has threatened the tenets of academic integrity upon which the entire education system hinges. This present conceptualization focuses on demystifying the concepts and conversations at the nexus of AI adoption and academic integrity. The conceptualization deeply explored the development of AI and the motivation for its deployment in education. A broad overview of academic integrity highlights the core values of honesty, trust, fairness, respect, responsibility, and courage. This was followed by a detailed exploration of the techniques used by students to avoid detection of AI-generated work. A focal discussion was then provided on the impact of AI-generated writing tasks on students’ academic integrity, highlighting both opportunities and challenges. Next, the technical, procedural, educational, and collaborative strategies for detecting and minimizing the rate of AI-generated work among students were discussed. The Technology Acceptance Model and Academic Integrity Framework were discussed as conceptualizations' theoretical foundations. The conceptualization closes with a summary of recent empirical research emphasizing the need for further studies to explore all ramifications of the influence of AI on academic integrity. It is hoped that the conceptual clarity provided in this work will support the emerging scholarship on AI's influence on society.
Downloads
References
G. Siemens and R. S. J. d. Baker, “Learning analytics and educational data mining,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, New York, NY, USA: ACM, Apr. 2012, pp. 252–254. doi: 10.1145/2330601.2330661.
D. Gašević, G. Siemens, and S. Sadiq, “Empowering learners for the age of artificial intelligence,” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 4, p. 100130, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100130.
K. VanLEHN, “The Relative Effectiveness of Human Tutoring, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, and Other Tutoring Systems,” Educ Psychol, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 197–221, Oct. 2011, doi: 10.1080/00461520.2011.611369.
P. Sedlmeier, “Intelligent Tutoring Systems,” International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, pp. 7674–7678, 2001, doi: 10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/01618-1.
A. T. Corbett and J. R. Anderson, “Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge,” User Modelling and User-Adapted Interaction, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 253–278, 1995, doi: 10.1007/BF01099821.
W. Holmes, M. Bialik, and C. Fadel, “Artificial intelligence in education,” in Data ethics : building trust : how digital technologies can serve humanity, Globethics Publications, 2023, pp. 621–653. doi: 10.58863/20.500.12424/4276068.
M. E. Oliveri and M. von Davier, “Analyzing invariance of item parameters used to estimate trends in international large-scale assessments,” Test fairness in the new generation of large-scale assessment, pp. 121–146, 2017.
M. Z. Alom et al., “A State-of-the-Art Survey on Deep Learning Theory and Architectures,” Electronics (Basel), vol. 8, no. 3, p. 292, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.3390/electronics8030292.
N. Selwyn, Should Robots Replace Teachers? AI and the Future of Education. Melbourne: Polity.
B. Williamson, Big Data in Education: The digital future of learning, policy and practice. 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road London EC1Y 1SP : SAGE Publications Ltd, 2017. doi: 10.4135/9781529714920.
R. S. Baker, “Educational Data Mining: An Advance for Intelligent Systems in Education,” IEEE Intell Syst, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 78–82, May 2014, doi: 10.1109/MIS.2014.42.
S. J. Russell and P. Norvig, Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. New York: Prentice Hall, 2010.
J. McCarthy, M. L. Minsky, N. Rochester, and C. E. Shannon, “A Proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence, August 31, 1955,” AI Mag, vol. 27, no. 4, p. 12, Dec. 2006, doi: 10.1609/aimag.v27i4.1904.
J. Hendler and A. M. Mulvehill, Social Machines. Berkeley, CA: Apress, 2016. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4842-1156-4.
D. Crevier, AI: The Tumultuous History of the Search for Artificial Intelligence. 1993.
D. E. Rumelhart, G. E. Hinton, and R. J. Williams, “Learning representations by back-propagating errors,” Nature, vol. 323, no. 6088, pp. 533–536, Oct. 1986, doi: 10.1038/323533a0.
N. Duggal, “What Is Artificial Intelligence with Examples and Uses.” Accessed: Mar. 09, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.simplilearn.com/tutorials/artificial-intelligence-tutorial/what-is-artificial-intelligence
M. Haenlein and A. Kaplan, “A Brief History of Artificial Intelligence: On the Past, Present, and Future of Artificial Intelligence,” Calif Manage Rev, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 5–14, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1177/0008125619864925.
S. Russell and P. Norvig, Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, 3rd ed. New Delhi: Pearson, 2009.
Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio, and G. Hinton, “Deep learning,” Nature, vol. 521, no. 7553, pp. 436–444, May 2015, doi: 10.1038/nature14539.
T. Brown et al., Language Models are Few-Shot Learners. 2020. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2005.14165.
K. Samuel and K. P. Extension, “The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Educational Assessment,” vol. 5, pp. 44–48, Aug. 2024.
B. Hamner and M. D. Shermis, “Contrasting state-of-the-art automated scoring of essays: analysis,” 2012. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:18407254
J. F. Pane, B. A. Griffin, D. F. McCaffrey, and R. Karam, “Effectiveness of Cognitive Tutor Algebra I at Scale,” Educ Eval Policy Anal, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 127–144, Jun. 2014, doi: 10.3102/0162373713507480.
N. F. Davar, M. A. A. Dewan, and X. Zhang, “AI Chatbots in Education: Challenges and Opportunities,” Preprints (Basel), Nov. 2024, doi: 10.20944/preprints202411.1286.v1.
B. Settles and B. Meeder, “A Trainable Spaced Repetition Model for Language Learning,” in Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2016, pp. 1848–1858. doi: 10.18653/v1/P16-1174.
H. Lakkaraju et al., “A Machine Learning Framework to Identify Students at Risk of Adverse Academic Outcomes,” in Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, New York, NY, USA: ACM, Aug. 2015, pp. 1909–1918. doi: 10.1145/2783258.2788620.
T. Davenport and R. Kalakota, “The potential for artificial intelligence in healthcare,” Future Healthc J, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 94–98, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.7861/futurehosp.6-2-94.
S. M. McKinney et al., “International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening,” Nature, vol. 577, no. 7788, pp. 89–94, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1799-6.
A. Blanco-González et al., “The Role of AI in Drug Discovery: Challenges, Opportunities, and Strategies,” Pharmaceuticals, vol. 16, no. 6, p. 891, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.3390/ph16060891.
A. Keshavarzi Arshadi et al., “Artificial Intelligence for COVID-19 Drug Discovery and Vaccine Development,” Front Artif Intell, vol. 3, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.3389/frai.2020.00065.
E. Yurtsever, J. Lambert, A. Carballo, and K. Takeda, “A Survey of Autonomous Driving: Common Practices and Emerging Technologies,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 58443–58469, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2983149.
L. Floridi et al., “AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations,” Minds Mach (Dordr), vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 689–707, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5.
N. Bostrom and E. Yudkowsky, “The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence,” in Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence, K. Frankish and W. Ramsey, Eds., New York: Cambridge University Press.
K. Grace, J. Salvatier, A. Dafoe, B. Zhang, and O. Evans, “Viewpoint: When Will AI Exceed Human Performance? Evidence from AI Experts,” 2018.
S. Russell, D. Dewey, and M. Tegmark, “Research Priorities for Robust and Beneficial Artificial Intelligence,” AI Mag, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 105–114, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.1609/aimag.v36i4.2577.
R. Kurzweil, The Singularity Is Nearer: When We Merge with AI. New York: Penguin Random House, 2020.
A. Kozanitis and L. Nenciovici, “Effect of active learning versus traditional lecturing on the learning achievement of college students in humanities and social sciences: a meta-analysis,” High Educ (Dordr), vol. 86, no. 6, pp. 1377–1394, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10734-022-00977-8.
M. D. Shermis and J. Burstein, Handbook of Automated Essay Evaluation. London: Routledge, 2013.
D. P. Kaur, A. Mantri, and B. Horan, “Enhancing Student Motivation with use of Augmented Reality for Interactive Learning in Engineering Education,” Procedia Comput Sci, vol. 172, pp. 881–885, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.127.
C.-C. Lin, A. Y. Q. Huang, and O. H. T. Lu, “Artificial intelligence in intelligent tutoring systems toward sustainable education: a systematic review,” Smart Learning Environments, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 41, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1186/s40561-023-00260-y.
D. J. Litman and K. Forbes-Riley, “Speech recognition performance and learning in spoken dialogue tutoring,” in Interspeech, 2005. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:6448352
I. Maya-Jariego, D. Holgado, E. González-Tinoco, J. Castaño-Muñoz, and Y. Punie, “Typology of motivation and learning intentions of users in MOOCs: the MOOCKNOWLEDGE study,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 203–224, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11423-019-09682-3.
D. L. McCabe and L. K. Trevino, “Academic Dishonesty,” J Higher Educ, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 522–538, Sep. 1993, doi: 10.1080/00221546.1993.11778446.
La Trobe University, “Academic Integrity, Student administration, La Trobe University.” Accessed: Mar. 09, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.latrobe.edu.au/students/admin/academic-integrity
International Center for Academic Integrity, The Fundamental Values of Academic Integrity. Accessed: Mar. 09, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://academicintegrity.org/aws/ICAI/pt/sp/home_page
T. Yamamoto, “The academic integrity & assessment landscape in Japan, and where to next, post-Covid.” Accessed: Mar. 09, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.turnitin.com.au/videos/the-academic-integrity-and-assessment-landscape-in-japan-and-where-to-next-post-covid
T. Bretag et al., “‘Teach us how to do it properly!’ An Australian academic integrity student survey,” Studies in Higher Education, vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 1150–1169, Aug. 2014, doi: 10.1080/03075079.2013.777406.
T. B. Gallant and P. Drinan, “Toward a Model of Academic Integrity Institutionalization: Informing Practice in Postsecondary Education,” Canadian Journal of Higher Education, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 25–43, 2008.
A. Simha, “Review of Cheating in College: Why Students Do It and What Educators Can Do About It,” Academy of Management Learning & Education, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 143–145, 2014.
I. Glendinning, “Comparison of policies for Academic Integrity in Higher Education across the European Union,” 2013.
C. Graf, “Research Integrity and AI: Navigating Challenges and Leveraging Potential - Choice 360.” Accessed: Mar. 09, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.choice360.org/webinars/research-integrity-and-ai-navigating-challenges-and-leveraging-potential/
T. Bretag et al., “Core elements of exemplary academic integrity policy in Australian higher education,” International Journal for Educational Integrity, vol. 7, no. 2, Dec. 2011, doi: 10.21913/IJEI.v7i2.759.
H. Tatum and B. M. Schwartz, “Honor Codes: Evidence Based Strategies for Improving Academic Integrity,” Theory Pract, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 129–135, Apr. 2017, doi: 10.1080/00405841.2017.1308175.
S. Cole and E. Kiss, “What Can we do about Student Cheating,” About Campus: Enriching the Student Learning Experience, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 5–12, May 2000, doi: 10.1177/108648220000500203.
W. J. Bowers, “Student dishonesty and its control in college,” Columbia University, New York, 1966.
R. A. Bernardi, A. V. Baca, K. S. Landers, and M. B. Witek, “Methods of Cheating and Deterrents to Classroom Cheating: An International Study,” Ethics Behav, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 373–391, Nov. 2008, doi: 10.1080/10508420701713030.
M. Brimble and P. Stevenson-Clarke, “Perceptions of the prevalence and seriousness of academic dishonesty in Australian universities,” The Australian Educational Researcher, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 19–44, Dec. 2005, doi: 10.1007/BF03216825.
D. L. McCabe and G. Pavela, “Ten (Updated) Principles of Academic Integrity: How Faculty Can Foster Student Honesty,” Change, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 10–15, 2004, [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40177967
S. E. Eaton and R. I. Edino, “Strengthening the research agenda of educational integrity in Canada: a review of the research literature and call to action,” International Journal for Educational Integrity, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 5, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.1007/s40979-018-0028-7.
D. Pecorari and B. Petrić, “Plagiarism in second-language writing,” Language Teaching, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 269–302, 2014, doi: DOI: 10.1017/S0261444814000056.
T. ‘Teddi’ Fishman, “Academic Integrity as an Educational Concept, Concern and Movement in US Institutions of Higher Learning,” in Handbook of Academic Integrity, Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2015, pp. 1–12. doi: 10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_1-2.
J. M. Lang, Cheating Lessons. Harvard University Press, 2013. [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt6wpmqb
TEQSA, “What is academic integrity?” Accessed: Mar. 09, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.teqsa.gov.au/students/understanding-academic-integrity/what-academic-integrity
J. Walker, S. King, and J. Brookes, “The impact of AI on academic integrity: A case study of generative writing tools,” Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 301–315, 2021.
S. E. Eaton and K. L. Turner, “Data privacy and AI in academic integrity systems,” Journal of Educational Technology Systems, pp. 202–220, 2020.
M. Perkins and J. Roe, “Decoding Academic Integrity Policies: A Corpus Linguistics Investigation of AI and Other Technological Threats,” Higher Education Policy, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 633–653, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1057/s41307-023-00323-2.
P. M. Newton, “Guidelines for Creating Online MCQ-Based Exams to Evaluate Higher Order Learning and Reduce Academic Misconduct,” 2024, pp. 269–285. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-54144-5_93.
R. Kumar, S. E. Eaton, M. Mindzak, and R. Morrison, “Academic Integrity and Artificial Intelligence: An Overview,” 2024, pp. 1583–1596. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-54144-5_153.
J. R. Young, “Are Algorithmically-Generated Term Papers the Next Big Challenge to Academic Integrity?” Accessed: Mar. 09, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.edsurge.com/news/2020-02-12-are-algorithmically-generated-term-papers-the-next-big-challenge-to-academic-integrity
E. Abdelaal, S. Walpita Gamage, and J. Mills, Artificial Intelligence Is a Tool for Cheating Academic Integrity. 2019.
T. Lancaster, “Adapting To Artificial Intelligence – The Future Of Academic Integrity.” Accessed: Mar. 09, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://thomaslancaster.co.uk/blog/adapting-to-artificial-intelligence-the-future-of-academic-integrity/
G. Oyedokun, “Artificial Intelligence and Academic Integrity: A New Frontier in Combating Emerging Threats,” 2025, pp. 189–196.
P. Dawson and W. Sutherland-Smith, “Can markers detect contract cheating? Results from a pilot study,” Assess Eval High Educ, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 286–293, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.1080/02602938.2017.1336746.
D. L. McCabe, L. K. Trevino, and K. D. Butterfield, “Cheating in Academic Institutions: A Decade of Research,” Ethics Behav, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 219–232, Jul. 2001, doi: 10.1207/S15327019EB1103_2.
D. Birks and J. Clare, “Linking artificial intelligence facilitated academic misconduct to existing prevention frameworks,” International Journal for Educational Integrity, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 20, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s40979-023-00142-3.
P. Dawson, Defending Assessment Security in a Digital World. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2021.: Routledge, 2020. doi: 10.4324/9780429324178.
P. Dawson and W. Sutherland-Smith, “Can markers detect contract cheating? Results from a pilot study,” Assess Eval High Educ, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 286–293, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.1080/02602938.2017.1336746.
F. Davis, “A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems,” Jan. 1985.
F. D. Davis, “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 3, p. 319, Sep. 1989, doi: 10.2307/249008.
A. M. Momani, M. M. Jamous, and S. M. S. Hilles, “Technology Acceptance Theories,” International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1–14, Apr. 2017, doi: 10.4018/IJCBPL.2017040101.
V. Venkatesh and F. D. Davis, “A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test,” Decision Sciences, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 451–481, Sep. 1996, doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb00860.x.
V. Venkatesh and F. D. Davis, “A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies,” Manage Sci, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 186–204, Feb. 2000, doi: 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926.
V. Venkatesh and F. D. Davis, “A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies,” Manage Sci, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 186–204, Feb. 2000, doi: 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926.
M. Fishbein and I. Ajzen, Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research, vol. 27. 1975.
I. Ajzen, “The theory of planned behavior,” Organ Behav Hum Decis Process, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 179–211, Dec. 1991, doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
P. M. Newton and C. Lang, “Custom Essay Writers, Freelancers, and Other Paid Third Parties,” in Handbook of Academic Integrity, Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2016, pp. 249–271. doi: 10.1007/978-981-287-098-8_38.
T. Foltýnek, N. Meuschke, and B. Gipp, “Academic Plagiarism Detection,” ACM Comput Surv, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 1–42, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1145/3345317.
H. Sun and J. Chen, “Bias in AI systems for academic integrity enforcement: A case study,” Journal of Educational Data Mining, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 112–128, 2022.
S. Holden, M. Norris, and H. Pohl, “The dual role of AI in academic integrity,” Journal of Educational Technology Systems, pp. 5–20, 2017.
D. Cotton, P. Cotton, and J. Shipway, “AI in education: Opportunities and ethical challenges,” Journal of Learning Analytics, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 5–22, 2020.
P. Sotiriadou, D. Logan, A. Daly, and R. Guest, “The role of AI in detecting contract cheating: Implications for academic integrity,” Assess Eval High Educ, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 30–44, 2020.
D. W. Johnson, R. T. Johnson, and K. A. Smith, “AI-driven interventions to promote academic integrity,” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 30–42, 2021.
T. S. Roberts, D. Turnbull, and Z. Lin, “AI for ethics education: Engaging students in academic integrity,” Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 34–50, 2021.
K. Miller, L. Smith, and H. Johnson, “Long-term impact of AI tools on academic integrity: A longitudinal study,” Journal of Educational Integrity, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 150–168, 2023.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Mathematics Instruction, Social Research and Opinion

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
















