Teachers’ Efficacy to Teach Students with Mathematics Learning Difficulties

Soo May Yoong; Fu Sai Hoe

doi:10.58421/misro.v1i3.29

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/misro.v1i3.29

Authors

Soo May Yoong Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
Fu Sai Hoe Sandakan District Education Office

Keywords:

Mathematics, Learning Difficulty, Dyscalculia, Teacher(s), Teacher Efficacy

Abstract

This study explores teachers’ perceptions of their efficacy in teaching students with mathematics learning difficulties, also known as dyscalculia. This study employed a quantitative survey method. Random cluster sampling was used to select 384 mathematics teachers in the survey. Teaching Students with Mathematics Learning Difficulties Scale has been adapted with permission from Dawson & Scott (2013). Inferential statistics of independent t-test, analysis of variance, and Kruskal Wallis H-test were used to analyze the data. The results showed that teachers have high efficacy in teaching students with mathematics learning difficulties. There is no significant difference in teachers’ effectiveness in teaching students with mathematics learning difficulties based on age groups and years of experience. However, the findings show a significant difference in teachers’ effectiveness based on different academic qualifications. This study implies that the awareness of dyscalculia among mathematics teachers has increased. Future researchers are suggested to design and develop more interventions and instruments to improve the basic mathematical skills among students with mathematics learning difficulties.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

S. M. Yoong, “An introduction: What do you know about dyscalculia?” in The Revolution Soc. Res. Educ., N. F. Habidin, S. Y. O. Yong, T. W. T. Chik, and U. A. Muhamad, Eds., Tanjung Malim, Malaysia: Kaizentrenovation Sdn Bhd, 2020, pp. 82–88.

Dariah, A. Muchyidin, and T. S. Nasehudin, “The effect of application of creative problem solving learning methods on students’ mathematics learning outcomes,” J. Math. Instr. Soc. Res. Opin., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 42–50, 2022.

S. M. Yoong, H. Hosshan, A. Shyielathy, A. Q. A. L. Ng, S. C. Lau, and G. Parthiban, “Validity and reliability of needs analysis questionnaire for dyscalculia instrument,” South Asian J. Soc. Sci. Humanit., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 111–124, 2022, doi: 10.48165/sajssh.2022.3307.

S. M. Yoong, S. Beram, G. Kumaran, and A. A. Yasin, “A survey on problems of dyscalculia in primary schools,” ICCCM-J. Soc. Sci. Humanit,., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 30–38, 2022, doi: 10.53797/icccmjssh.v1i2.4.2022.

B. Butterworth, Dyscalculia from Science to Education, Oxon, United Kingdom: Routledge, 2019.

K. I. Chin and S. H. Fu, “Exploring the implementation of an intervention for a pupil with mathematical learning difficulties: A case study,” J. Math. Educ., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 531–546, 2021, doi: 10.22342/jme.12.3.14473.531-546.

V. D. Fina, R, Cera, R., and G. Palmisano, The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Person with Disabilities, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2017.

H. O. Putri, Jamali, and A. Muchyidin, “The comparison of students mathematics learning outcomes between using performance assessment and self-assessment,” J. Math. Instr. Soc. Res. Opin., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 11–19, 2022.

J. H. Hunt, K. Martin, B. Patterson, and A. Khounmeuang, “Special educators knowledge of student mathematial thinking,” J. Math. Teach. Educ., pp. 1–18, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10857-021-09508-1.

R. Kunwar and L. Sharma, “Exploring teachers' knowledge and students' status about dyscalculia at basic level students in Nepal,” EURASIA J. Math. Sci. Teach. Educ., vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 1–12, 2020, doi: 10.29333/ejmste/8940.

C. Latorre-Cosculluela, V. Sierra-Sanchez, S. Vazquez-Toledo, and J. Royo-Ardid, “Critical thinking and inclusive practice: A qualitative study of Spanish primary school teachers' perceptions,” Issues Educ. Res., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 834–853, 2021, http://www.iier.org.au/iier31/latorre-cosculluela.pdf.

A. Gervasoni and A. Peter-Koop, “Inclusive mathematics education,” Math. Educ. Res. J., vol. 32, pp. 1–4, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s13394-020-00315-0.

P. Sousa, P. C. Dias, and I. Cadime, “Predictors of primary school teachers' knowledge about developmental dyscalculia,” Eur. J. Spec. Needs Educ., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 204–220, 2017, doi: 10.1080/08856257.2016.1216635.

A. Wijaya, H. Retnawati, W. Setyaningrum, K. Aoyama, and Sugiman, “Diagnosing students' learning difficulties in the eyes of Indonesian Mathematics teachers,” J. Math. Educ., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 357–364, 2019, doi: 10.22342/jme.10.3.7798.357-364.

U. Sharma, T. Loreman, and C. Forlin, “Measuring teacher efficacy to implement inclusive practices,” J. Res. Spec. Educ. Needs, vol. 12, pp. 12–21, 2012, doi: 10.1111/j.1471-3802.2011.01200.x.

D. Zhang, Q. Wang, J. Stegall, M. Losinki, and A. Katsiyannis, “The construction and initial validation of the student teachers’ efficacy scale for teaching students with disabilities,” Remedial Spec. Educ., vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 39–52, 2018, doi: 10.1177/0741932516 686059.

K. Weber and F. Greiner, “Development of pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy belief and attitudes towards inclusive education through first teaching experiences,” J. Res. Spec. Educ. Needs, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 73–84, 2019, doi: 10.1111/1471-3802.12479.

J. Metsala and M. Harkins, “An examination of preservice teachers’ self-efficacy and beliefs about inclusive education,” Teach. Educ. Spec. Educ., vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 178–192, 2020, doi: 10.1177/0888406419873060.

A. V. Mieghem, E. Struyf, and K. Verschueren, “The relevance of sources of support for teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs towards students with special educational needs,” Eur. J. Spec. Needs Educ., pp. 1–15, 2020, doi: 10.1080/08856257.2020.1829866.

S. M. Yoong, S. H. Fu, W. L. Wong, and L. Shen, “Malaysian primary teachers’ perceptions on dyscalculia,” South Asian J. Soc. Sci. Humanit., vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 125–136, 2021, doi: 10.48165/sajssh.2021.2610125.

H. Dawson and L. Scott, "Teaching students with disabilities efficacy scale: Development and validation," Inclusion, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 181–196, 2013, doi: 10.1352/2326-6988-1.3.181.

S. H. Fu and K. E. Chin, “An online survey research regarding awareness of dyscalculia among educators in Sandakan district, Sabah,” Int. J. Acad. Res. Progress. Educ. Dev., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1–10, 2017, doi: 10.6007/IJARPED /v6-i2/2891.

F. Salas-Rodriguez, S. Lara, and M. Martinez, "Spanish version of the teachers' sense of efficacy scale: An adaptation and validation study,” Front. Psychol., vol. 12, pp. 1–12, 2021, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.714145

A. Yada, M. Leskinen, H. Savolainen, and S. Schwab, “Meta-analysis of the relationship between teachers’ self-efficacy and attitudes toward inclusive education,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 109, pp. 1-15, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2021.103521.

R. V. Krejcie and D. W. Morgan, “Determining sample size for research activities,” Educ. Psychol. Meas., vol. 30, pp. 607–610, 2015, doi: 10.1177/00131 6447003000308.

L. Cohen, L. Manion, and K. Morrison, Res. Method Educ., 5th ed. Los Angeles, U.S.: SAGE Publications, 2018.

R. Thannimalai and A. Raman, “Principals technology leadership and teachers technology integration in the 21st century classroom,” Int. J. Civ. Eng. Tech., vol. 9, no.2, pp. 177–187, 2018, doi: 10.29333/iji.2019.12428a.

U. Ekstam, J. Korhonen, K. Linnanmaki, and P. Aunio, “Special education and subject teachers' self-perceived readiness to teach mathematics to low-performing middle school students,” J. Res. Spec. Educ. Needs, pp. 1–11, 2017, doi: 10.1111/1471-3802.12393.

J. Maurer, A. Becker, J. Hilkenmeier, and M. Daseking, “Experiences and perceived self-efficacy in distance learning among teachers of students with special educational needs,” Front. Psychol., vol. 12, pp. 1–11, 2021, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.733865.