Prospective Mathematics Teachers’ Perceptions of the Use of Problem-Based Learning (PBL) Models in Mathematics Learning

Nurdalilah Nurdalilah; Ariyadi Wijaya; Elly Arliani

doi:10.58421/misro.v5i2.1604

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/misro.v5i2.1604

Authors

Nurdalilah Nurdalilah Universitas Muslim Nusantara Al-Washliyah
Ariyadi Wijaya Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta
Elly Arliani Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta

Keywords:

Inquiry-based learning, Mathematics education, Pedagogical readiness, Pre-service teachers, Problem-based learning.

Abstract

This study examines prospective mathematics teachers’ perceptions of Problem-Based Learning (PBL) in mathematics education, focusing on their understanding of PBL characteristics, the role of problems as learning triggers, and their readiness to implement PBL in future teaching practice. The study addresses the gap between positive perceptions of PBL and pedagogical readiness for inquiry-based mathematics instruction. A mixed-methods approach with a sequential explanatory design was employed. Quantitative data were collected through questionnaires administered to 35 prospective mathematics teachers, while qualitative data were obtained through semi-structured interviews to deepen the interpretation of the quantitative findings. The results indicate that prospective teachers generally hold highly positive perceptions toward PBL, particularly regarding its ability to support critical thinking, collaboration, conceptual understanding, and contextual mathematics learning. Qualitative findings revealed that participants viewed problems in PBL as starting points for conceptual exploration rather than exercises given after instruction. However, participants also identified challenges related to authentic problem design, classroom management, inquiry facilitation, and time allocation. The study highlights the importance of strengthening experiential PBL training, problem design, and facilitation skills in mathematics teacher education programs. Although the limited sample size restricts generalizability, the study contributes to understanding the relationship between perceptions and pedagogical readiness in PBL implementation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

NCTM, “Principles to Action: Ensuring Mathematical Success for All.” 2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.nctm.org/PtA/

OECD, PISA 2018 Results (Volume I) What Students Know And Can Do. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-2018-results-volume-i_5f07c754-en.html

Partnership for 21st Century Skills, Framework for 21st Century Learning. 2009.

NCTM, Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM, 2000.

G. Brousseau, Theory of Didactical Situations in Mathematics, 19th ed. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.

M. Artigue, “Didactical Design in Mathematics Education. In C. Winsløw (Ed.), Nordic Research in Mathematics Education. Proceedings of NORMA08, Copenhagen, April 21–25, 2008,” Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, 2009, pp. 7–16.

M. Kunter, U. Klusmann, J. Baumert, D. Richter, T. Voss, and A. Hachfeld, “Professional competence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality and student development,” J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 805–820, 2013, doi: 10.1037/a0032583.

D. Loewenberg Ball, M. H. Thames, and G. Phelps, “Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special?,” J. Teach. Educ., vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 389–407, 2008, doi: 10.1177/0022487108324554.

C. E. Hmelo-Silver, “Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn?,” Educ. Psychol. Rev., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 235–267, 2004.

L. S. Shulman, “Those Who Understand: A Conception of Teacher Knowledge,” Am. Educ., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 4–14, 1986, [Online]. Available: http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/recordDetail?accno=EJ333816%5Cnpapers3://publication/uuid/E77F7FFC-98B3-40B5-90D2-50050B024672

S. M. McDonald, “Perception: A concept analysis,” Int. J. Nurs. Knowl., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 2–9, 2012, doi: 10.1111/j.2047-3095.2011.01198.x.

M. F. Pajares, “Teachers’ Beliefs and Educational Research: Cleaning up a Messy Construct Author(s): M. Frank Pajares Source: Review of Educational Research, Vol. 62, No. 3 (Autumn, 1992), pp. 307–332 Published by: American Educational Research Association,” vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 307–332, 2018.

O. Chapman, “Challenges in mathematics teacher education,” J. Math. Teach. Educ., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 263–270, 2012, doi: 10.1007/s10857-012-9223-2.

M. Buess, “Metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Current therapeutic options,” Tagliche Prax., vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 51–58, 2012.

R. I. Arends, Learning to Teach, 9th ed. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill, 2012.

H. Barrows, Problem-Based Learning Applied to Medical Education. Springfield, Illinois: Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, 2000.

J. R. Savery, “Overview of Problem-Based Learning: Definitions and Distinctions,” Interdiscip. J. Probl. Learn., vol. 1, no. 1, 2006, doi: https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1002.

W. Hung, “The 3C3R Model: A Conceptual Framework for Designing Problems in PBL,” Interdiscip. J. Probl. Learn., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 5–22, 2006, doi: 10.7771/1541-5015.1006.

E. S. Boye and D. D. Agyei, “Effectiveness of the problem-based learning strategy in the ‘Soc. Sci. Humanit. Open, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 100453, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100453.

D. A. Martin and R. Jamieson-Proctor, “Pre-service Teachers’ Perceptions of Problem-Based Learning for Developing Their Mathematics Teaching Pedagogy,” Interdiscip. J. Probl. Learn., vol. 16, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.14434/ijpbl.v16i1.28739.

P. A. Ertmer and K. D. Simons, “Jumping the PBL Implementation Hurdle: Supporting the Efforts of K–12 Teachers,” Interdiscip. J. Probl. Learn., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 40–54, 2006, doi: 10.7771/1541-5015.1005.

S. Suryanti, T. Nusantara, I. N. Parta, and S. Irawati, “Problem-based tasks in teacher training programs: Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and practices,” J. Math. Educ., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 257–274, 2022, doi: 10.22342/jme.v13i2.pp257-274.

J. W. Creswell and V. L. P. Clark, “Choosing a mixed methods design,” in Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, California: Sage Publications, Inc., 2011, pp. 53–106.

C. H. LAWSHE., “A Quantitative Approach To Content Validity,” Pers. Psychol., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 563–575, 2006, doi: C. H. Lawshe. (1975). A Quantitative Approach To Content Validity. , 28(4), 563–575. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x.

R. S. A. Ilker Etikan, Sulaiman Abubakar Musa, “Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling,” Am. J. Theor. Appl. Stat., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–4, 2016, doi: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11.

H. N. Boone and D. A. Boone, “Analyzing Likert data,” J. Ext., vol. 50, no. 2, 2012, doi: 10.34068/joe.50.02.48.

P. Jiang, Y. Zhang, Y. Jiang, and B. Xiong, “Preservice mathematics teachers’ perceptions of mathematical problem solving and its teaching: A case from China,” Front. Psychol., vol. 13, no. November, pp. 1–16, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.998586.

I. Novikasari, “Pre-service teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching in problem-based learning,” JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 160–174, 2020, doi: 10.23917/jramathedu.v5i2.10556.

J. Bosica, J. S. Pyper, and S. MacGregor, “Incorporating problem-based learning in a secondary school mathematics pre-service teacher education course,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 102, p. 103335, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2021.103335.

C. E. Hmelo-Silver and H. S. Barrows, “Goals and Strategies of a Problem-Based Learning Facilitator,” Interdiscip. J. Probl. Learn., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 5–22, 2006, doi: 10.7771/1541-5015.1004.

F. Mudofir and U. N. Semarang, “Implementation of problem-based learning and the challenges in science education: A systematic literature review,” vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 24–36, 2025, doi: 10.58524/jasme.v5i2.1020.

S. Temel, “The effects of problem-based learning on pre-service teachers’ critical thinking dispositions and perceptions of problem-solving ability,” South African J. Educ., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2014, doi: 10.15700/201412120936.