Critical Representation of Figures, Symbols, and Power in Political Communication: Bibliometric Analysis of Phenomenological Studies

Anida Kusuma Ning Ariati; Anang Sujo

doi:10.58421/misro.v5i2.1567

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/misro.v5i2.1567

Authors

Anida Kusuma Ning Ariati Universitas Brawijaya
Anang Sujo Universitas Brawijaya

Keywords:

Bibliometrics, Political Communication, Political Representation

Abstract

The representation of political figures, symbols, and power in contemporary political communication has become increasingly complex as digital media expand and political narratives evolve. However, a comprehensive understanding of how these issues have been examined within phenomenological political communication studies remains limited. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the critical representation of figures, symbols, and power in political communication through a critical phenomenological perspective integrated with bibliometric analysis. The research employed a bibliometric approach combined with critical phenomenology to map publication trends, influential authors, dominant keywords, and citation networks in phenomenological studies of political communication published between 2010 and 2025. Data were collected using Publish or Perish software and analyzed with Microsoft Excel and VOSviewer to visualize relationships among authors, keywords, and citations. The findings revealed a substantial increase in publications since 2021, indicating growing scholarly interest in the field. The dominant themes identified included gender representation, populist political figures, identity politics, and the symbolism of power in digital communication environments. The analysis further demonstrated that scholarly discourse has become increasingly fragmented while simultaneously consolidating around several influential clusters, particularly those related to communicative action, political narratives, and symbolic representation. The study concludes that integrating bibliometric methods with critical phenomenology effectively uncovers the discursive landscape, intellectual structure, and representational biases in contemporary political communication research. These findings advance political communication studies conceptually and methodologically by strengthening critical perspectives on representation, symbolic experience, and power relations in political discourse.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

M. Karnaukhova, I. Aryabkina, I. Talina, M. Lukyanova, S. Danilov, and O. ( Khasyanov, “Axiological component in political discourse and its analysis in the process of training masters of political science,” Wisdom, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 111–124., 2021, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v17i1.411

P. J. Verovšek, “The Philosopher as Engaged Citizen: Habermas on the Role of the Public Intellectual in the Modern Democratic Public Sphere,” Eur. J. Soc. Theory, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 526–544., 2021, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310211003192

S. Chambers and J. Kopstein, “Wrecking the public sphere: The new authoritarians’ digital attack on pluralism and truth.,” Constellations, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 225– 240., 2023, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12620

C. Lafont, “A democracy, if we can keep it. Remarks on J. Habermas’ a new structural transformation of the public sphere,” Constellations, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 77–83., 2023.

M. Patberg, “What is Social Media ’ s Place in Democracy ? The Review of Politics,” vol. 87, pp. 236–257., 2025.

D. Hána and J. Šel, “Political graffiti in the political symbolic space of Prague , Czechia,” Urban Res. Pract., vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 679–698., 2022, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2021.1902556

A. L. Schotel and L. Mügge, “Politics without Presence? the Symbolic Representation of Trans People in Germany and the Netherlands.,” Polit. Gender, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 788–813., 2024, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X24000308

K. E. Stauffer, “Public Perceptions of Women’s Inclusion and Feelings of Political Efficacy.,” Am. Polit. Sci. Rev., vol. 115, no. 4, pp. 1226–1241., 2021, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000678

M. Wahman, N. Frantzeskakis, and T. M. Yildirim, “From Thin to Thick Representation: How a Female President Shapes Female Parliamentary Behavior,” Am. Polit. Sci. Rev., vol. 115, no. 2, pp. 360–378., 2021, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305542100006

A. Nai, M. Medeiros, M. Maier, and J. Maier, “Euroscepticism and the use of negative, uncivil and emotional campaigns in the 2019 European Parliament election: A winning combination,” Eur. Union Polit., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 21–42., 2022, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/14651165211035675

M. Dewanty and B. Bram, “Discourse representation on Indonesian socio- political situation in the Instagram posts of an English-speaking Indonesian community,” J. Soc. Stud. (JSS), vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 55–62., 2023, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.21831/jss.v19i1.52935

N. S. A. M. Fuhat and J. A. Wahab, “Mapping Media Framing and Politics: A Bibliometric Analysis Across the Globe.,” Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci., vol. 14, no. 4, 2024.

Y. Zhu and E. W. Cheng, “Multidimensional Diversity and Research Impact in Political Science: What 50 Years of Bibliometric Data Tell Us,” Perspect. Polit., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 686–704., 2025, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592724000641

Z. P. Momčinović, “What Women Politicians Could, Would, and Should, but Cannot Do. Perceptions of Women Parliamentarians Regarding Barriers to Political Representation of Women in Bosnia and Herzegovina.,” Rev. Za Sociol., vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 365–395., 2023, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.5613/rzs.53.3.2

D. F. Sjoraida, “Contemporary Trends in Political Communication and Public Relations: A Global Bibliometric Analysis of Research Patterns in Political Discourse (2020-2024),” Stud. Media Commun., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 148–156., 2025, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.11114/smc.v13i3.7602

A. Litvinenko, “YouTube as Alternative Television in Russia: Political Videos During the Presidential Election Campaign 2018.,” Soc. Media Soc., vol. 7, no. 1, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120984455

Z. Jinbao, “Critical Literature Review: A Theoretical Framework Based on Phenomenology and Critical Thinking.,” Iris J. Educ. Res., vol. 4, no. 4, 2025.

D. A. Pitigoi, “Political communication and symbolic representation in the digital public sphere,” J. Media Res., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 45–58., 2021.

P. Ricoeur, Narrative identity. In D. Wood (Ed.). On Paul Ricoeur: Narrative and interpretation (pp. 188–199). Routledge., 1991.

A. Izotov and O. Inshakov, “Narrative identity and collective meaning in the hermeneutic philosophy of Paul Ricoeur,” Rudn J. Philos., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 495–508., 2021.

M. Kumorek, “The role of time in the theory of narrative identity in the philosophy of Paul Ricoeur.,” Rudn J. Philos., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 483–494., 2021, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2021-25-3-483-494

K. Freistein and F. Gadinger, “Performing leadership: International politics through the lens of visual narrative analysis.,” Polit. Res. Exch., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 2124922., 2022, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/2474736X.2022.2124922

L. Sorensen, “Populist disruption and the fourth age of political communication. European Journal of Communication,” Eur. J. Commun., vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 71–85., 2024.

D. Shome, T. A. Neyazi, and S. W. T. Ng, “Personalization of politics through visuals: Interplay of identity, ideology, and gender in the 2021 West Bengal Assembly Election campaign,” Media, Cult. Soc., vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 777–797., 2024.

N. Gakahu, “Image-centrism in Africa’s political communication: A social semiotic analysis of self-presentation practices by women political candidates in Kenya’s social media space.,” Information, Commun. Soc., vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 1687–1711., 2024.