Perceptions and Practices of the Ideal Teacher Instructional Delivery

Carla Jobelle Culajara; Buenaventura Luces

doi:10.58421/misro.v2i3.142

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/misro.v2i3.142

Authors

Carla Jobelle Culajara Sta. Catalina National High School https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3885-762X
Buenaventura Luces Sta. Catalina National High School https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3885-762X

Keywords:

Ideal teacher, Instructional Competence, Personal attributes, Professional development, Teaching effectiveness

Abstract

Teachers play a crucial role in improving every lesson's calibre at this stage of the teaching and learning process. The teacher has to keep up with all the complications that develop due to the quick changes in the teaching and learning process. This study aims to learn what excellent teachers mean to school administrators. The study's goals were to: (1) identify the personal, professional, and instructional competence of an ideal teacher; (2) explore how these traits impact how instruction is delivered; and (3) create a framework that takes these traits into account. The study used a participatory action research methodology with a qualitative research design. Four department heads and three master teachers took part. The study used a qualitative research design employing participatory action research. It was participated by 4 Department Heads and 3 Master Teachers in Classroom Observation and focus group discussion (FGD). Purposive sampling was used in choosing participants. Based on the findings, themes emerged: compassion, flexibility, adaptability, adapting (Vision, Mission, Goals, and Objectives) VMGO, setting standards using (Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers) PPST and creating solid linkages and involvement, and student-centred learning. The novel the research addresses the importance of Classroom Observation and how to become an ideal teacher in the 21st century.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

C. J. Culajara, J. P. M. Culajara, O. Portos, and M. K. Villapando, “Digitalization of Modules and Learning Tasks for Flexible, Convenient, And Safe Learning Experience of Students,” Int. J. Soc. Learn., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 350–365, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.47134/ijsl.v2i3.172.

H. K. Ates and S. Kadioglu, “Identifying the Qualities of an Ideal Teacher in line with the Opinions of Teacher Candidates,” Eur. J. Educ. Res., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 103–111, 2018, doi: 10.12973/eu-jer.7.1.103.

G. Z. Efimova, A. N. Sorokin, and M. V. Gribovskiy, “Ideal teacher of higher school: Personal qualities and socio-professional competencies,” Educ. Sci. J., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 202–230, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.17853/1994-5639-2021-1-202-230.

C. Şanlı, A. Sezer, and A. Pınar, “Perceptions of Geography Teachers to Integrating Technology to Teaching and their Practices,” Rigeo, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 234–252, 2016.

J. Michael, D. Rosario, and M. A. Chavez, “Teaching effectiveness : Basis for the development of assessment tool,” vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 41–65, 2022.

A. K. Sandal, I. Helleve, K. Smith, and S. M. Gamlem, “Feedback practice in lower secondary school: Exploring development of perceptions of feedback practice among students and teachers,” Cogent Educ., vol. 9, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2022.2101236.

C. J. Culajara, “Improving teachers ’ professional development through School Learning Action Cell (SLAC),” J. Res. Policy Pract. Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 76–88, 2023.

I. Béres, T. Magyar, and M. Turcsányi-Szabó, “Towards a personalised, learning style based collaborative blended learning model with individual assessment,” Informatics Educ., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–28, 2012, doi: 10.15388/infedu.2012.01.

S. Kemmis, R. McTaggart, and R. Nixon, The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. 2014.

K. B. Flannery, P. Fenning, M. McGrath Kato, and K. McIntosh, “Effects of school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports and fidelity of implementation on problem behavior in high schools,” Sch. Psychol. Q., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 111–124, 2014, doi: 10.1037/spq0000039.

V. Clarke and V. Braun, “Thematic analysis,” J. Posit. Psychol., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 297–298, 2017, doi: 10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613.

M. DeJonckheere and L. M. Vaughn, “Semistructured interviewing in primary care research: A balance of relationship and rigour,” Fam. Med. Community Heal., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1–8, 2019, doi: 10.1136/fmch-2018-000057.

H. Kallio, A. M. Pietilä, M. Johnson, and M. Kangasniemi, “Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide,” J. Adv. Nurs., vol. 72, no. 12, pp. 2954–2965, 2016, doi: 10.1111/jan.13031.

I. V. Ancho and G. S. Arrieta, “Filipino teacher professional development in the new normal,” Educ. Self Dev., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 25–43, 2021, doi: 10.26907/esd.16.3.04.

M. F. Lee, S. C. J. Lim, and C. S. Lai, “Assessment of teaching practice competency among in-service teacher degree program (PPG) in Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia,” J. Tech. Educ. Train., vol. 12, no. 1 Special Issue, pp. 181–188, 2020, doi: 10.30880/jtet.2020.12.01.019.

J. L. De Vera, M. D. Andrada, A. Bello, and M. G. De Vera, “Teachers’ Competencies in Educational Technology Integration on Instructional Methodologies in the New Normal,” An Online J. Pedagog., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 61–80, 2021.

K. Palenikova and Z. Jenisova, “Differences in Characteristics of an Actual Teacher and the Vision of an Ideal Teacher From in-Service Teachers’ Point of View (Perspective),” ICERI2017 Proc., vol. 1, no. October 2018, pp. 2115–2124, 2017, doi: 10.21125/iceri.2017.0629.

Y. U. Dangara, “Educational Resources: An Integral Component for Effective School Administration in Nigeria,” Res. Humanit. Soc. Sci., vol. 6, no. 13, pp. 27–37, 2016.

A. C. Gines, “Tracer Study of PNU Graduates,” Am. Int. J. Contemp. Res., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 81–98, 2014.

M. Sirakaya and D. Alsancak Sirakaya, “Trends in Educational Augmented Reality Studies: A Systematic Review,” Malaysian Online J. Educ. Technol., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 60–74, 2018, doi: 10.17220/mojet.2018.02.005.

R. Englander, J. R. Frank, C. Carraccio, J. Sherbino, S. Ross, and L. Snell, “Toward a shared language for competency-based medical education,” Med. Teach., vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 582–587, 2017, doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1315066.

S. A. Sahin, N. Tunca, Y. Altinkurt, and K. Yilmaz, “Relationship between professional values and critical thinking disposition of science-technology and mathematics teachers,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 25–40, 2016, doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2016.1371a.

I. Demchenko, B. Maksymchuk, V. Bilan, I. Maksymchuk, and I. Kalynovska, “Training Future Physical Education Teachers for Professional Activities under the Conditions of Inclusive Education,” Brain. Broad Res. Artif. Intell. Neurosci., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 191–213, 2021, doi: 10.18662/brain/12.3/227.

J. M. Del Rosario Aquino and E. Rivano, “Awareness , Acceptance , and Understanding of University Vision , Mission , College Goals and BSIT Objectives of Laguna State Polytechnic University Stakeholders towards its VMGO,” ASEAN J. Educ., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 26–33, 2022.

T. Majoko, “Teacher Key Competencies for Inclusive Education: Tapping Pragmatic Realities of Zimbabwean Special Needs Education Teachers,” SAGE Open, vol. 9, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1177/2158244018823455.

J. M. McGaha and S. M. Linder, “Determining Teacher Candidates’ Attitudes Toward Global-Mindedness,” Action Teach. Educ., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 305–321, 2014, doi: 10.1080/01626620.2014.948225.

J. M. Pocaan, “Exploring Teaching Strategies and Challenges Towards a Holistic Context-Based Special Education Teaching Strategies Program,” Norm. Light., vol. 16, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.56278/tnl.v16i1.1975.

D. Ruggiero and C. J. Mong, “The teacher technology integration experience: Practice and reflection in the classroom,” J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Res., vol. 14, no. 2015, pp. 161–178, 2015, doi: 10.28945/2227.

W. Tao, Y. Lee, R. Sun, J. Y. Li, and M. He, “Enhancing Employee Engagement via Leaders’ Motivational Language in times of crisis: Perspectives from the COVID-19 outbreak,” Public Relat. Rev., vol. 48, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102133.

H. Rekaa, H. Hanisch, and B. Ytterhus, “Inclusion in Physical Education: Teacher Attitudes and Student Experiences. A Systematic Review,” https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2018.1435852, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 36–55, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1080/1034912X.2018.1435852.

J. P. M. Culajara and C. J. Culajara, “A Case Study on Teacher’s Challenges on Inclusive Mathematics Classes in a Secondary Public School,” J. Math. Instr. Soc. Res. Opin., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 145–157, May 2023, doi: 10.58421/misro.v2i2.90.

E. Bhattacharyya and A. B. M. S. @ Shariff, “Learning Style and its Impact in Higher Education and Human Capital Needs,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 123, pp. 485–494, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1448.

S. Joseph, M. Thomas, G. Simonette, and L. Ramsook, “The Impact of Differentiated Instruction in a Teacher Education Setting: Successes and Challenges,” Int. J. High. Educ., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 28–40, 2013, doi: 10.5430/ijhe.v2n3p28.

M. Otukile-Mongwaketse, B. Mangope, and A. B. Kuyini, “Teachers’ understandings of curriculum adaptations for learners with learning difficulties in primary schools in Botswana: issues and challenges of inclusive education,” J. Res. Spec. Educ. Needs, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 169–177, Jul. 2016, doi: 10.1111/1471-3802.12069.

M. Ben-Peretz and M. A. Flores, “Tensions and paradoxes in teaching: implications for teacher education,” https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2018.1431216, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 202–213, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1080/02619768.2018.1431216.

I. Isjoni, A. Daud, and A. Azhar, “Integrity and Performance of High School Teachers in Pekanbaru,” Indones. J. Econ. Soc. Humanit., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 51–57, 2019, doi: 10.31258/ijesh.1.1.5.

P. Z. J. Raguindin, Z. U. Custodio, and F. Bulusan, “Engaging, affirming, nurturing inclusive environment: A grounded theory study in the Philippine context,” IAFOR J. Educ., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 113–131, 2021, doi: 10.22492/ije.9.1.07.

M. Kooy and K. van Veen, “Teacher learning that matters: International perspectives,” Teach. Learn. That Matters Int. Perspect., pp. 1–273, Feb. 2012, doi: 10.4324/9780203805879.

A. ElSayary, “The impact of a professional upskilling training programme on developing teachers’ digital competence,” J. Comput. Assist. Learn., 2023, doi: 10.1111/JCAL.12788.

P. Fotheringham, T. Harriott, G. Healy, G. Arenge, and E. Wilson, “Pressures and influences on school leaders navigating policy development during the COVID-19 pandemic,” Br. Educ. Res. J., vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 201–227, 2022, doi: 10.1002/berj.3760.

C. Freire, M. del M. Ferradás, B. Regueiro, S. Rodríguez, A. Valle, and J. C. Núñez, “Coping Strategies and Self-Efficacy in University Students: A Person-Centered Approach,” Front. Psychol., vol. 11, May 2020, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00841.

O. L. Agu, “Work engagement, organizational commitment, self efficacy and organizational growth : A literature review,” Inf. Impact J. Inf. Knowl. Manag., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 14–29, 2016.

H. Miyauchi, “A systematic review on inclusive education of students with visual impairment,” Educ. Sci., vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 1–15, 2020, doi: 10.3390/educsci10110346.

L. Awuah, “Supporting 21st-Century Teaching and Learning: The Role of Google Apps for Education,” J. Instr. Res., vol. 4, no. 2015, pp. 12–22, 2015, doi: 10.9743/jir.2015.2.

T. Nguyen et al., “Insights Into Students’ Experiences and Perceptions of Remote Learning Methods: From the COVID-19 Pandemic to Best Practice for the Future,” Front. Educ., vol. 6, p. 91, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.3389/FEDUC.2021.647986/BIBTEX.

N. N. Norboev, “Theoretical Aspects of the Influence of Motivation on Increasing the Efficiency of Physical Education,” Curr. Res. J. Pedagog., vol. 02, no. 10, pp. 247–252, 2021, doi: 10.37547/pedagogics-crjp-02-10-44