The Impact of Conducive Learning Environments on Learners’ Attitudes Towards Geometry: A Null Relationship

Vuyolwethu Zinge; Shakespear Chiphambo

doi:10.58421/misro.v5i4.1331

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/misro.v5i4.1331

Authors

Vuyolwethu Zinge iYunivesithi Walter Sisulu
Shakespear Chiphambo iYunivesithi Walter Sisulu https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1894-5649

Keywords:

Geometry , Learning environment , Learner attitudes, Social presence

Abstract

Geometry remains a critical component of mathematics education due to its role in developing spatial reasoning, logical thinking, and problem-solving skills essential for STEM-related fields. However, persistent negative learner attitudes toward geometry continue to hinder achievement and engagement, particularly in under-resourced educational contexts. While existing literature suggests that conducive learning environments positively influence learner attitudes, limited research has explored this relationship specifically within geometry or examined contexts where such relationships may be inconsistent or complex. Therefore, this study investigated the relationship between conducive learning environments and learners’ attitudes toward geometry. Guided by the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework, the study adopted a mixed-methods approach. Quantitative data were collected through questionnaires and analysed using chi-square tests and contingency coefficients to determine the strength of association between variables. Qualitative data were obtained through semi-structured interviews with mathematics teachers and analysed thematically, with findings interpreted through the lenses of teaching, cognitive, and social presence. The quantitative results revealed a statistically significant and moderately strong relationship between learning environments and learners’ attitudes toward geometry (χ² = 53.146, p < 0.001; V = 0.543). However, qualitative findings indicated that systemic challenges, such as overcrowded classrooms, limited resources, inconsistent pedagogical practices, and weak learner engagement, constrain the effectiveness of these environments. This study contributes to the literature by providing a context-sensitive understanding of the environment–attitude relationship, demonstrating that the alignment of instructional, cognitive, and social factors mediates the impact of conducive learning environments. It further highlights the need for integrated and sustainable interventions to improve geometry learning outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

N. Sinclair, M. de Villiers, and A. Hoyles, The Learning and Teaching of Geometry in Secondary Schools, 2nd ed. New York, NY, USA: Routledge, 2022.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Principles to Actions: Ensuring Mathematical Success for All, Reston, VA, USA: NCTM, 2023.

K. Jones and M. Tzekaki, “Research on the teaching and learning of geometry,” in Compendium for Research in Mathematics Education, Reston, VA, USA: NCTM, 2021, pp. 109–149.

OECD, The State of Global Education 2022: Learning Environments for the Future, Paris, France: OECD Publishing, 2022.

T. Fujita, K. Jones, and Y. Kunimune, “Learners’ understanding of geometry and proof: A global perspective,” ZDM–Mathematics Education, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 5–20, 2020.

I. V. S. Mullis, M. O. Martin, P. Foy, and M. Hooper, TIMSS 2023 International Results in Mathematics and Science, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, 2023.

I. Stylianides and A. Stylianides, “Secondary learners’ reasoning and proof in geometry,” Educational Studies in Mathematics, vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 223–240, 2022.

M. S. Hannula, “Attitudes, beliefs, and emotions in mathematics education: An overview,” ZDM–Mathematics Education, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 567–582, 2022.

I. Marchis, “Learners’ attitudes toward mathematics: A review of recent research,” Acta Didactica Napocensia, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 45–58, 2022.

R. Scherer, M. Nilsen, and H. Jansen, “Classroom climate and learners’ attitudes toward mathematics,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 72, 2023.

E. Kyndt, V. Dochy, and F. Struyven, “The impact of learner-centred learning environments on motivation and engagement,” Educational Research Review, vol. 38, 2023.

B. J. Fraser, “Classroom learning environments: Retrospect, context and prospect,” Learning Environments Research, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2023.

R. Lazarides and D. Raufelder, “Control-value theory and learner emotions in mathematics,” Learning and Instruction, vol. 71, 2021.

UNESCO, Reimagining our futures together: Education for equity and quality learning environments. Paris, France: UNESCO Publishing, 2023.

J. Schiepe-Tiska, “School and classroom learning environment and learner outcomes,” Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education, 2019, doi: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.916.

T. E. Hodges and S. Kim, “Effects of constructivist learning environments on learners’ attitudes and achievement in mathematics,” Journal of Mathematical Behavior, vol. 70, p. 101050, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2023.101050.

S. Bansilal and J. Naidoo, “Enhancing geometric understanding through dynamic visualisation tools in secondary mathematics classrooms,” Pythagoras, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2024, doi: 10.4102/pythagoras.v45i1.815.

M. A. Olatunji, F. A. Adebayo, and O. O. Ajayi, “Learners’ attitudes towards geometry and their performance in secondary schools,” International Journal of Mathematical

P. Singh and N. Govender, “The mediating role of learner attitudes in geometry achievement: Evidence from secondary education,” South African Journal of Education, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2025, doi: 10.15700/saje.v45n1a2529.

G. Aquilina, M. Grima, and S. Debono, “The construct of attitude in mathematics education research: Current trends and emerging perspectives,” Studies in Educational Evaluation, vol. 82, p. 101331, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101331.

W. Mwakapenda, “Teaching and learning geometry in context: The role of classroom practices and learner engagement,” African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 123–135, 2022, doi: 10.1080/18117295.2022.2045678.

D. R. Garrison, T. Anderson, and W. Archer, “Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education,” The Internet and Higher Education, vol. 2, no. 2–3, pp. 87–105, 2000, doi: 10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6.

Y. Zhou, “Perceived teacher support profiles and learners’ attitudes toward mathematics,” Behavioral Sciences, early access, 2025.

C. V. S. Sujero and R. A. Alcuizar, “Teaching approaches and learners’ conceptual understanding in geometry,” International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, early access, 2025.

K. B. Danlami, “Improving learners’ performance in geometry: An empirical study,” Frontiers in Psychology, early access, 2025.

H. Na, “Technology-enhanced learning and its impact on learners’ geometry attitudes,” Interactive Learning Environments, early access, 2025.

I. Ndungo, S. Balimuttajjo, E. Akugizibwe, and C. M. Muwonge, “Modeling learners’ attitudinal shifts in transformation geometry under technology-enhanced and conventional Van Hiele phased instruction,” African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 279–296, 2025, doi: 10.1080/18117295.2025.2529124.

V. Kumazah and D. D. Agyei, “Enhancing high school geometry learning with inquiry-based teaching: Impact on learner understanding, performance, and attitudes,” African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. xx, no. x, pp. xxx–xxx, 2025.

E. Namaziandost et al., “Cooperative learning approaches and learner outcomes in mathematics,” Cogent Education, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2020.

J. A. Bouwer and N. Nkosi, “The influence of online formative assessment in Euclidean geometry on learners’ attitudes,” Pythagoras, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2022.

L. Ainsworth and R. Bell, “Emotional factors and learner engagement in mathematics learning,” Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 45–60, 2025.

J. K. Mensah and K. Adu-Gyamfi, “Socio-cultural influences on learners’ mathematics learning and attitudes,” International Journal of Educational Research, vol. 115, pp. 102–110, 2024.

Y. Zhang, X. Li, and H. Chen, “Mathematics anxiety and its impact on learner attitudes and performance,” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 112–130, 2024.

OECD, PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2023.

T. Mahlobo, “Classroom climate and learners’ attitudes toward geometry in South African schools,” South African Journal of Childhood Education, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2023.

M. Ndlovu, “The role of socio-economic context in shaping learners’ attitudes toward mathematics,” African Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 67–82, 2024.

A. M. Else-Quest, J. S. Hyde, and M. C. Linn, “Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: A meta-analysis,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 136, no. 1, pp. 103–127, 2010, doi: 10.1037/a0018053.

S. H. An, M. Song, and K. J. Meier, “Gender representation and academic environments,” Public Administration, vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 900–922, 2022.

J. W. Creswell and J. D. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 2018.

L. Cohen, L. Manion, and K. Morrison, Research Methods in Education, 8th ed. London, U.K.: Routledge, 2018.

R. Kumar, Research Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide for Beginners, 5th ed. London, U.K.: SAGE Publications, 2019.

P. Lavrakas, Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 2020.

The Impact of Conducive Learning Environments on Learners’ Attitudes Towards Geometry: A Null Relationship

DOI:

Authors

Keywords:

Abstract

Downloads

References

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

How to Cite

Issue

Section

License

SideBar

Contact Us

visitor