The Cost-Effectiveness of Conventional and Modern Approaches in Wound Care Management in a General Hospital

Ivanda Rian Pratama; Farida Yuliaty

doi:10.58421/misro.v5i2.1006

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/misro.v5i2.1006

Authors

Ivanda Rian Pratama Universitas Sangga Buana Bandung
Farida Yuliaty Universitas Sangga Buana Bandung

Keywords:

Wound Care, Qualitative Study, Conventional Methods, Modern Dressing, Diabetic Ulcer, Patient Perception

Abstract

Wound care management continues to evolve from traditional techniques toward evidence-based modern practices designed to optimize healing outcomes. This qualitative descriptive study explored the comparative effectiveness and experiential perspectives of conventional and modern wound care methods among healthcare providers and patients in a general hospital in Indonesia. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, participant observations, and documentation reviews involving participants, including nurses, wound care specialists, and diabetic ulcer patients. Thematic analysis was employed to identify recurring patterns and insights regarding healing progress, patient comfort, and perceived cost-efficiency. The findings revealed four major themes: (1) perceived healing outcomes, where modern methods were viewed as promoting faster tissue regeneration and reduced infection risk; (2) comfort and convenience, as patients receiving modern dressings experienced less pain and fewer dressing changes; (3) professional adaptation and skill demand, highlighting the need for continuous training in modern wound management; and (4) cost and accessibility considerations, where the higher initial cost of modern dressings was offset by shorter healing duration and fewer complications. Overall, participants perceived modern wound care as more effective and patient-centered, although implementation barriers remain regarding resources and staff competence. The study underscores the importance of integrating modern wound care practices into hospital protocols while enhancing professional capacity to ensure sustainable adoption

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

B. Setyowati and W. M. Karunianingtyas, “Penerapan Perawatan Luka Dengan Metode Moist Wound Healing Pada Pasien Diabetikum Tipe 2,” 2021.

Rafika Nur Siregar, “Modern And Classic Wound Dressing Comparison In Wound Healing,” International Journal of Medicine and Health, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 01–05, May 2024, doi: 10.55606/ijmh.v3i2.3092.

N. Wang, S.-S. Li, Y.-P. Liu, Y.-Y. Peng, and P.-F. Wang, “Comparison of negative pressure wound therapy and moist wound care in patients with diabetic foot ulcers: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials,” Medicine, vol. 101, no. 31, p. e29537, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029537.

V. Popescu et al., “Chronic Wound Management: From Gauze to Homologous Cellular Matrix,” Biomedicines, vol. 11, no. 9, p. 2457, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11092457.

R. D. Ramadhan, M. P. Wijaya, and D. R. Hidayat, “Advances in Urology: A Comprehensive Literature Review on Urolithiasis Management and Innovations,” Brawijaya Journal of Urology, vol. 6, no. 01, pp. 11–19, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.11594/bjurology.2025.006.01.3.

M. A. Weigelt et al., “Advanced Wound Diagnostics: Toward Transforming Wound Care into Precision Medicine,” Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 330–359, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1089/wound.2020.1319.

E. K. Elliason, “Traditional Healing Systems and Modern Healthcare Integration: A Comparative Study of Indigenous Medical Practices in Southeast Asia,” 2025.

H. Karolus Siregar, S. Butar butar, S. Maria Pangaribuan, and K. Batubara, “Effectiveness Of Modern Wound Treatment Using Wanding Techniques Moist Wound Healing In Healing Diabetic Ulcers In Clinic Rumat Jakarta,” 2023.

S. Taufiq and M. Jamil Fauzi, “Comparison of Conventional and Modern Wound Care in Post-Section Wounds at Cut Mutia Hospital, North Aceh Regency in 2023,” Journal of Health Science, vol. 5, no. 5, p. p, 2024.

M. S. Ramadhan, S. Siregar, and M. Akhmad, “Comparison Between Conventional Wound Care Procedures and Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Fournier’s Gangrene Patients,” Urology Research and Practice, p. 203, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.5152/tud.2025.25099.

C. C. Q. Wong, K. Tomura, and O. Yamamoto, “Wound Healing Performance in a Moist Environment of Crystalline Glucose/Mannose Film as a New Dressing Material Using a Rat Model: Comparing with Medical-Grade Wound Dressing and Alginate,” Pharmaceuticals, vol. 16, no. 11, p. 1532, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.3390/ph16111532.

E. M. Tottoli, R. Dorati, I. Genta, E. Chiesa, S. Pisani, and B. Conti, “Skin Wound Healing Process and New Emerging Technologies for Skin Wound Care and Regeneration,” Pharmaceutics, vol. 12, no. 8, p. 735, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12080735.

H.-Y. Su et al., “Cost-effectiveness of Novel Macrophage-Regulating Treatment for Wound Healing in Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulcers From the Taiwan Health Care Sector Perspective,” JAMA Netw Open, vol. 6, no. 1, p. e2250639, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.50639.

M. Mirhaj, S. Labbaf, M. Tavakoli, and A. M. Seifalian, “Emerging treatment strategies in wound care,” Int Wound J, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 1934–1954, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1111/iwj.13786.

H. K. Siregar, Y. Yenny, S. Butar, S. M. Pangaribuan, and K. Batubara, “Effectiveness Of Modern Wound Treatment Using Wanding Techniques Moist Wound Healing In Healing Diabetic Ulcers In Clinic Rumat Jakarta,” Jurnal Perawat Indonesia, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1480–1490, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.32584/jpi.v7i3.2393.

C. A. Barrett, A. J. Truckenmiller, and T. L. Eckert, “Performance Feedback During Writing Instruction: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis,” School Psychology, 2020, doi: 10.1037/spq0000356.

K. Marthinsen, D. Tien, and D. Nguyen, “A social cooperative fitness application promoting an active lifestyle,” 2020.

W. Afikirtiani, A. Arwani, and D. A. M. Widigdo, “Potential of Honey Hydrogel Modern Dressing in Wound Healing of Patients with Grade II Diabetic Foot Ulcer,” Indonesian Contemporary Nursing Journal (ICON Journal), vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 7–15, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.20956/icon.v8i1.28153.

M. K. Rahman, “Medical tourism: tourists’ perceived services and satisfaction lessons from Malaysian hospitals,” Tourism Review, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 739–758, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1108/TR-01-2018-0006.

C. Ho et al., “A Comprehensive Analysis of Moist Versus Non‐Moist Dressings for Split‐Thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Health Sci Rep, vol. 8, no. 1, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70315.

G. P. de Sousa, M. K. A. Fontenele, R. B. da Rocha, and V. S. Cardoso, “Update of Topical Interventions for Healing Diabetic Ulcers—A Systematic Review,” Int J Low Extrem Wounds, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 222–234, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1177/15347346211013189.

L. F. M. da Silva et al., “Ineffective Airway Clearance in Surgical Patients: Evaluation of Nursing Interventions and Outcomes,” Int J Nurs Knowl, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 251–256, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1111/2047-3095.12242.

P. Kolimi, S. Narala, D. Nyavanandi, A. A. A. Youssef, and N. Dudhipala, “Innovative Treatment Strategies to Accelerate Wound Healing: Trajectory and Recent Advancements,” Cells, vol. 11, no. 15, p. 2439, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.3390/cells11152439.

C. Wang et al., “Wound management materials and technologies from bench to bedside and beyond,” Nat Rev Mater, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 550–566, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41578-024-00693-y.

A. M. Pinto, M. A. Cerqueira, M. Bañobre-Lópes, L. M. Pastrana, and S. Sillankorva, “Bacteriophages for Chronic Wound Treatment: From Traditional to Novel Delivery Systems,” Viruses, vol. 12, no. 2, p. 235, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.3390/v12020235.