The Development of Student Worksheet Materials Teaching in a Project-Based Learning Approach

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v1i3.31

Authors

  • Siti Nadifah Institut Agama Islam Negeri Syekh Nurjati, Cirebon
  • Hendri Raharjo Institut Agama Islam Negeri Syekh Nurjati, Cirebon
  • Indah Nursuprianah Institut Agama Islam Negeri Syekh Nurjati, Cirebon

Keywords:

Student Worksheet, Project Based Learning, Learning Outcomes

Abstract

This study aims to describe the development of Student Worksheet materials teaching the Project Based Learning approach at MTs An-Nashuha Kalimukti Pabedilan-Cirebon Regency in mathematics learning on opportunity material. Mathematics learning is done by applying the project-based learning approach with a sample class of 35 students. The method used is the cluster random sampling technique, which takes clusters or groups, not based on population members taken one by one or individually. The use of data is a test instrument in the form of a pretest and posttest to measure the value of student results of learning outcomes and a questionnaire to determine student responses to the use of worksheets with the Project Based Learning approach. The pretest and posttest tests show that students have increased, Normal and homogeneous distribution. Furthermore, to determine the effectiveness of teaching materials, researchers used the Paired Sample t-Test. The Paired Sample t-Test calculation results showed a significance value of 0,000. Thus the significance value is smaller than 0.05, and 10.280 is more incredible than t table 2.04. Based on the results of the calculation of tcount> t-table, Ho is rejected. Because there are, there are differences in the average initial and final scores on the subject matter of opportunities and the use of Student Worksheet teaching materials as the development of materials teaching products are considered quite effective.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

L. Verschaffel, “Word problems in mathematics education: a survey,” ZDM - Math. Educ., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11858-020-01130-4.

A. Christopoulos, “A learning analytics theoretical framework for stem education virtual reality applications,” Educ. Sci., vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 1–15, 2020, doi: 10.3390/educsci10110317.

T. H. Kramarenko, “Application of GeoGebra in Stereometry teaching,” CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2643. pp. 705–718, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85089596949.

J. VanTassel-Baska, Content-based curriculum for high-ability learners. 2021.

N. Calder, “Mathematics education students’ experiences during lockdown: Managing collaboration in elearning,” Educ. Sci., vol. 11, no. 4, 2021, doi: 10.3390/educsci11040191.

M. Muslich and F. Yustianti, KTSP Pembelajaran Berbasis Kompetensi dan Kontekstual. Panduan bagi Guru, Kepala Sekolah dan Pengawas Sekolah. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2007.

K. Prasad, “New media, e-learning and content development: Innovative approaches to online education,” Education in Europe: Perspectives, Opportunities and Challenges. pp. 1–18, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85110346844.

A. Khamseh, “Designing a model developed to assess the capabilities of technological innovation in Iranian construction of power plant equipment industries,” J. Eng. Des. Technol., vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 1241–1249, 2020, doi: 10.1108/JEDT-10-2019-0276.

B. Lungu, “Exploring the effects on student learning and engagement of COVID-19: An innovative and interdisciplinary approach,” J. Microbiol. Biol. Educ., vol. 22, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.1128/JMBE.V22I1.2429.

J. Owolabi, “Implementation of innovative educational technologies in teaching of anatomy and basic medical sciences during the covid-19 pandemic in a developing country: The covid-19 silver lining?,” Adv. Med. Educ. Pract., vol. 12, pp. 619–625, 2021, doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S295239.

Dariah, A. Muchyidin, and T. S. Nasehudin, “The Effect of Application of Creative Problem Solving Learning Methods on Students ’ Mathematics Learning Outcomes,” J. Math. Instr. Soc. Res. Opin., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 42–50, 2022.

H. O. Putri and A. Muchyidin, “The Comparison of Students Mathematics Learning Outcomes Between Using Performance Assessment and Self-assessment,” J. Math. Instr. Soc. Res. Opin., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 11–19, 2022.

J. D. Schweig, “Day by Day: Investigating Variation in Elementary Mathematics Instruction That Supports the Common Core,” Educ. Res., vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 176–187, 2020, doi: 10.3102/0013189X20909812.

D. Quinn, “Blended learning in first year engineering mathematics,” ZDM - Math. Educ., vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 927–941, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11858-020-01160-y.

T. Sato, “Japanese elementary teachers’ professional development experiences in physical education lesson studies,” Phys. Educ. Sport Pedagog., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 137–153, 2020, doi: 10.1080/17408989.2019.1692808.

J. Gao, “Sources of Mathematics Self-Efficacy in Chinese Students: a Mixed-Method Study with Q-Sorting Procedure,” Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 713–732, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10763-019-09984-1.

B. Munzar, “Elementary students’ cognitive and affective responses to impasses during mathematics problem solving.,” J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 104–124, 2021, doi: 10.1037/edu0000460.

H. Raharjo and I. I’anah, “Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Berbasis Komputer dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Pada Pokok Bahasan Kubus dan Balok,” Eduma Math. Educ. Learn. Teach., vol. 3, no. 2, 2014, doi: 10.24235/eduma.v3i2.59.

Kemendikbud, “Permendikbud Nomor 103 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pembelajaran Pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Pendidikan Menengah,” Pedoman Eval. Kurikulum, 2014, [Online]. Available: http://pgsd.uad.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/lampiran-permendikbud-no-104-tahun-2014.pdf.

S. Y. Chen, “Effect of project-based learning on development of students’ creative thinking,” Int. J. Electr. Eng. Educ., vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 232–250, 2022, doi: 10.1177/0020720919846808.

T. Donoghue, “Teaching Creative and Practical Data Science at Scale,” J. Stat. Data Sci. Educ., vol. 29, 2021, doi: 10.1080/10691898.2020.1860725.

Y. V Shuhailo, “Project-based learning for undergraduate engineering students minoring in textile technology and design,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1840, no. 1. 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1840/1/012042.

T. Srimadhaven, “Learning analytics: Virtual reality for programming course in higher education,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 172. pp. 433–437, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.095.

Q. Li, “A hybrid learning pedagogy for surmounting the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic in the performing arts education,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 7635–7655, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10612-1.

T. T. Wu, “Applying project-based learning and SCAMPER teaching strategies in engineering education to explore the influence of creativity on cognition, personal motivation, and personality traits,” Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 35, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100631.

I. Barlenti, M. Hasan, and D. Mahidin, “Pengembangan Lks Berbasis Project Based Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep,” J. Pendidik. Sains Indones., vol. 05, no. 01, pp. 81–86, 2017, [Online]. Available: http://jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/jpsi.

Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2017.

Downloads

Published

2022-08-01

How to Cite

[1]
Siti Nadifah, Hendri Raharjo, and Indah Nursuprianah, “The Development of Student Worksheet Materials Teaching in a Project-Based Learning Approach”, J.Gen.Educ.Humanit., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 131–138, Aug. 2022.

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 3 (2022): August

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of General Education and Humanities

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.