Ritual and Resistance: A Critical Analysis of GMIT Women’s Spirituality through the Practice of Naketi, Nazar, and Fasting
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v5i4.1869Keywords:
Gender Inequality, Resilience, Spirituality , Women of the GMITAbstract
This study aims to develop the concept of ritual resilience theory to address the gap in understanding how local Christian rituals function as a mechanism for shaping the spiritual resilience of GMIT women in East Amanuban Classis, who face social issues such as premarital pregnancy, domestic violence, verbal abuse, and patriarchal cultural pressures that trigger trauma, identity crises, and spiritual vulnerability. The research used a qualitative, phenomenological approach, integrated with anthropological theology, sociology, and psychology. Data were collected through observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation involving ten informants (GMIT women, pastors, and community leaders). The findings indicate that the rituals of naketi, vow (nazar), and fasting play a significant role in shaping women’s spiritual resilience. Naketi provides space for reflection and emotional reconciliation; vows strengthen commitment and hope in life; and fasting cultivates self-control and mental endurance. These three rituals also enhance social solidarity, foster community acceptance, and build transcendent relationships with God through forgiveness, repentance, and surrender. However, the rituals exhibit ambivalence: within a patriarchal context, they can become an additional burden for women while simultaneously serving as a space for spiritual agency that enables them to rise from suffering. The study’s main contribution is the development of ritual resilience theory as a synthesis of local culture, Christian spirituality, and resilience theory, which can serve as a foundation for contextual theology, pastoral care, and women’s empowerment strategies in addressing social injustice.
Downloads
References
M. Z. Amiruddin, E. Zuhriah, and N. H. Zarapi, “Perpetuating Inequality: Barriers and Legal Safeguards for Women in Domestic Violence Situations,” DIKTUM J. Syariah dan Huk., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–10, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.35905/diktum.v22i1.8837.
E. N. Hayati, U. Högberg, M. Hakimi, M. C. Ellsberg, and M. Emmelin, “Behind the silence of harmony: risk factors for physical and sexual violence among women in rural Indonesia,” BMC Womens. Health, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 52, Dec. 2011, doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-11-52.
A. R. Syahrizal, “The Stigma of Widows in Jokes: An Analysis of Symbolic Violence,” J. Locus Penelit. dan Pengabdi., vol. 4, no. 6, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.58344/locus.v4i6.4058.
S. Cole, P. Tallman, G. Salmon-Mulanovich, and B. Rusyidi, “Water insecurity is associated with gender-based violence: A mixed-methods study in Indonesia,” Soc. Sci. Med., vol. 344, p. 116507, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116507.
V. Salwa, F. N. B. Peranginangin, and H. Rochmaniya, “Kekerasan terhadap Perempuan: Tantangan dan Solusi Psikologis,” J. Sos. Hum., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 58–80, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.70214/4Z4J0C29.
D. Hlalele and L. T. Mabasa, “The struggles for research ethics and integrity in rural communities,” Interdiscip. J. Rural Community Stud., vol. 7, no. 2, p. a01, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.38140/ijrcs-2024.vol7.2.01.
S. Clarke-Habibi, “Reflections on the foundations of resilience and healing,” in The Routledge International Handbook of Trauma-Responsive Peacebuilding, Inggris: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2026, p. 16.
S. Tarabih and D. Saint Arnault, “Enabling factors that facilitate recovery among survivors of gender‐based violence,” J. Psychiatr. Ment. Health Nurs., vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 836–844, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1111/jpm.13037.
A. A. Alhazmi and A. Kaufmann, “Phenomenological Qualitative Methods Applied to the Analysis of Cross-Cultural Experience in Novel Educational Social Contexts,” Front. Psychol., vol. 13, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.785134.
M. S. Hossain, M. K. Alam, and M. S. Ali, “Phenomenological Approach in the Qualitative Study: Data Collection and Saturation,” ICRRD Qual. Index Res. J., vol. 5, no. 2, 2024, doi: 10.53272/icrrd.v5i2.4.
E. Denny and A. Weckesser, “How to do qualitative research?,” BJOG An Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., vol. 129, no. 7, pp. 1166–1167, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17150.
M. DeJonckheere and L. M. Vaughn, “Semi-structured interviewing in primary care research: a balance of relationship and rigour,” Fam. Med. Community Heal., vol. 7, no. 2, p. e000057, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1136/fmch-2018-000057.
K. I. Pargament and C. L. Park, “In Times of Stress: The Religion-Coping Connection,” in The Psychology of Religion, Routledge, 2019, pp. 44–53. doi: 10.4324/9780429495915-4.
K. Pargament, M. Feuille, and D. Burdzy, “The Brief RCOPE: Current Psychometric Status of a Short Measure of Religious Coping,” Religions, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 51–76, Feb. 2011, doi: 10.3390/rel2010051.
S. de Beauvoir, “The Second Sex,” in Princeton Readings in Political Thought, Princeton University Press, 2018, pp. 603–613. doi: 10.2307/j.ctv19fvzzk.57.
J. Butler, “Categories by which we try to live,” Eur. J. Philos., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 283–288, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1111/ejop.12843.
K. Glumbíková and A. Gojová, “Transformation of the identity of homeless women with an experience of domestic violence: changing from a victim to a survivor: an example from shelters for mothers in the Czech Republic,” J. Soc. Work Pract., vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 151–162, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1080/02650533.2019.1567479.
F. D. Schwalm, R. B. Zandavalli, E. D. de Castro Filho, and G. Lucchetti, “Is there a relationship between spirituality/religiosity and resilience? A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies,” J. Health Psychol., vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 1218–1232, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1177/1359105320984537.
T. Soko-de Jong, “Through the Eyes of Laughter : Fulata Lusungu Moyo’s Theology,” 2024, pp. 137–160. doi: 10.20378/irb-96493.
M. Percy, “Speaking Truth to Power Structures: Integrity and Identity in Ecclesiology,” J. Angl. Stud., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 379–400, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1017/S1740355324000317.
L. M. Ellsberg and L. Heise, Researching Violence Against Women: A Practical Guide for Researchers and Activists. Washington, DC, USA: World Health Organization, 2005.
M. A. Dutton and L. A. Goodman, “Coercion in intimate partner violence: Toward a new conceptualization,” Sex Roles, vol. 52, no. 11–12, pp. 743–756, Jun. 2005, doi: 10.1007/s11199-005-4196-9.
J. W. Creswell and C. N. Poth, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 2018.
V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, 2006, doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
M. van der Kolk, The Body Keeps the Score: Brain, Mind, and Body in the Healing of Trauma. New York, NY, USA: Viking, 2014
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of General Education and Humanities

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Robi Adison Kause, Ezra Tari, Fenetson Pairikas, Relevant Pastoral and Teaching Models in Pentecostal Churches in Indonesia Region I Kupang City , Journal of General Education and Humanities: Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026): June

















