Biotic Ecolexicon in the Gotilon Harvest Ceremony: An Ecolinguistic Study of HKBP Congregation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v5i3.1199

Authors

Keywords:

Biotic ecolexicon, Ecolinguistics, Environmental ethics, HKBP community, Language and ecology, Local wisdom, Ritual discourse

Abstract

This study addresses how biotic ecolexical items are represented in the Gotilon ceremony discourse of the HKBP Pardomuan Congregation and how these linguistic elements reflect ecological meanings, cultural values, and theological perspectives toward nature. The study aims to: 1) Identify biotic ecolexical items related to living beings in the Gotilon ritual discourse, 2) Interpret their ecological significance from an ecolinguistic perspective, and 3) Explain their functions within the ceremonial and cultural context. This research employs a qualitative descriptive method grounded in Arran Stibbe’s ecolinguistic framework. Data were collected through Participant observation of the Gotilon ceremony, documentation of ritual texts, in-depth interviews with church members and community elders. Data analysis focuses on identifying, classifying, and interpreting ecolexical items within their ecological and cultural contexts. The findings reveal a diverse range of biotic ecolexical items referring to plants, animals, and agricultural products, such as rice, buffalo, chicken, banyan tree, and mango tree. These lexical items function beyond literal meanings and carry deeper ecological and symbolic significance. They represent ecological values and collective memory, reflect theological beliefs about nature as a divine gift, serve as symbols of gratitude and prosperity, act as sacrificial elements in ritual practices, and function as a bridge connecting humans, nature, and God. Overall, the Gotilon ceremonial discourse reflects an integrated ecological worldview combining spirituality, agricultural traditions, and environmental responsibility.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Stibbe, A. Ecolinguistics: Language, ecology and the stories we live by. Routledge. 2015

Halliday, M. A. K. New ways of meaning: The challenge to applied linguistics. In A. Fill & P. Mühlhäusler (Eds.), The ecolinguistics reader. Continuum. 2001

Bang, J. C., & Døør, J. Language, ecology and society: A dialectical approach. Continuum. 2007

Stibbe, A. Ecolinguistics: Language, ecology and the stories we live by (2nd ed.). Routledge. 2021

Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B. Lexical semantics and ecolinguistics: Approaches to the study of ecological lexicons. John Benjamins. 2017

Lubis, R., & Widayati, D. Marine Ecolexicon of Noun-Verb of the Coast Community in Pesisir Barus, Central Tapanuli. Jurnal Arbitrer, 8(1), 82–92. https://doi.org/10.25077/ar.8.1.82-92.2021. 2021

Jones, O., & Cloke, P. Tree cultures: The place of trees and trees in culture. Society & Space. Berg Publishers. 2002

Basso, K. H. Wisdom sits in places: Landscape and language among the Western Apache. University of New Mexico Press. 1996

Mühlhäusler, P. Language of Environment, Environment of Language: A Course in Ecolinguistics. Battlebridge. 2003

Napitupulu, R. Ritual practice in Batak HKBP churches. Medan: Universitas Sumatera Utara Press. 2018

Ulfa, M., & Bhatti, M. S. Interrelation of the ecological lexicon with regional language sustainability. Jurnal Konfiks, 11(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.26618/konfiks.v11i1.14468. 2024

Nerlich, B., Koteyko, N., & Brown, B. Theory and language of climate change communication. Discourse & Society, 21(1), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926509348703. 2010

Fill, A., & Mühlhäusler, P. (Eds.). The ecolinguistics reader: Language, ecology and environment. Continuum. 2001

Berlin, B. Ethnobiological Classification: Principles of Categorization of Plants and Animals in Traditional Societies. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1994.21.2.02a00220. 1992

Prasetyo, S.F., Harmony of Nature and Culture: Symbolism and Environmental Education in Ritual. Journal of Contemporary Rituals and Traditions Vol. 1, No. 2(2023), 67-76. https://doi.org/10.15575/jcrt.361. 2023

Cronon, W. A place for stories: Nature, history, and narrative. The Journal of American History, 78(4), 1347–1376. https://doi.org/10.2307/2079346. 1992

Hakim, L., Hasibuan, F. A.., Purwaningsih, D. I.., & Fitri, S. Language and Ecology: A Semantic Analysis Of Environmental Vocabulary in Indonesian Regional Languages. Journal of Humanities Research Sustainability, 2(2), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.70177/jhrs.v2i2.2547. 2024

Denpasar, I. G. A. Exploring ecolinguistics: A new paradigm for tourism English learning. Englisia: Journal of Language, Education, and Humanities, 12(2), 116–136. doi: https://doi.org/10.22373/ej.v12i2.27648. 2025

Maffi, L. On biocultural diversity: Linking language, knowledge, and the environment. Smithsonian Institution Press. 2001

Tobing, S. Cultural and ecological symbols in Batak rituals. Pematangsiantar: Batak Heritage Press. 2019

Ingold, T. The perception of the environment: Essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. Routledge. 2000

Descola, P. Beyond nature and culture. University of Chicago Press. 2013

Milton, K. Environmentalism and cultural theory: Exploring the role of anthropology in environmental discourse. Routledge. 1996

Mbete, A. M. Linguistik Kebudayaan: Pembelajaran Bahasa Berbasis Kearifan Lokal. 2013

Simanjuntak, T. A. Ecolinguistic “water” in Toba Batak language community. Jurnal BASIS, 6(2) 209 – 214. https://doi.org/10.33884/basisupb.v6i2.1427. 2019

Skutnabb-Kangas, T., & Harmon, D. "Biological Diversity and Language Diversity." Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Environmental Science. DOI:10.4324/9781315687391-2. 2018

Alwin Fill, & Hermine Penz. (Eds.). (2018). The Routledge Handbook of Ecolinguistics. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315687391

Andrew Goatly. (2001). Green grammar and grammatical metaphor. In Alwin Fill & Peter Mühlhäusler (Eds.), The Ecolinguistics Reader: Language, Ecology and Environment (pp. 203–225). Continuum.

Hall, M. (2011). Plants as Persons: A Philosophical Botany. SUNY Press.

Creswell, J. W. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. 2014

Halliday, M. A. K. New ways of meaning: The challenge to applied linguistics. In A. Fill & P. Mühlhäusler (Eds.), The Ecolinguistics Reader: Language, Ecology and Environment (pp. 175–202). Continuum. 2001

Fairclough, N. Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Routledge. 2013

Alexander, R. J. & Stibbe, A. From the analysis of ecological discourse to the ecological analysis of discourse. Language Sciences, 41, 104-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.08.011. 2014

Kamarullah, K. & Yanti, L. A. Mapping the Intersection of Ecolinguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis: A Bibliometric Approach. SAWERIGADING, 30(1), 56-74. https://doi.org/10.26499/sawer.v30i1.1250. 2024

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. 2018

Denzin, N. K. The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. McGraw-Hill. 1978

Posey, D. A. Cultural and spiritual values of biodiversity. United Nations Environment Programme. 1997

Milton, K. (1996). Environmentalism and Cultural Theory: Exploring the Role of Anthropology in Environmental Discourse. Routledge. 1996

Agbeleoba, S. O., Orebe, O., Adekunle-Ojo, G., & Owolabi, O. Ecolinguistic and critical discourse analysis of environmental narratives in Sustainable Development Goal communications. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 13(5), 195–202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20251305.12. 2025

Nabhan, G. P. (1997). Cultures of habitat: On nature, culture, and story. Counterpoint.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2026-06-09

How to Cite

[1]
K. N. Manik, “Biotic Ecolexicon in the Gotilon Harvest Ceremony: An Ecolinguistic Study of HKBP Congregation ”, J.Gen.Educ.Humanit., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 3491–3502, Jun. 2026.

Issue

Section

Articles