Cambodia-U.S. Paradoxical Relations in Post-Cold War Era: The China Factor
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58421/misro.v5i1.955Keywords:
Cambodia-U.S. relations, China factor, Liberal institutionalism, Structural realism, Hedging strategyAbstract
This article investigates the structural paradox characterizing Cambodia-U.S. relations in the post-Cold War period, in which the persistence of political and security friction coexists with functional cooperation. The study identifies policy areas in which China’s emergence as an unconditional patron creates tension with the U.S., and analyzes mechanisms through which Chinese support enables Cambodia to evade U.S. normative pressure on democracy and human rights. Using an analytic eclecticism approach that combines structural realism and liberal institutionalism, the study conducts a qualitative content analysis of semi-structured interviews with 13 elite informants, including Cambodian government officials, U.S. diplomats, and analysts. The findings demonstrate that China’s multidimensional assistance (economic, military, and diplomatic) has significantly undermined Western normative leverage, forcing Cambodia to pursue a dual-track strategy that focuses conflict in the high-politics domain (security, governance) and maintains cooperation in the low-politics domain (trade, development assistance, public health). This pattern generates a state of managed contradiction, which compartmentalizes the coexistence of political hostility and functional cooperation without progressing towards normative convergence or bilateral breakdown. The study makes an empirical contribution by tracing how patron diversification reshapes small-state agencies and by showing that alternative patronage enables states to resist normative pressure while preserving selective cooperation in an era of great-power competition.
Downloads
References
K. Clymer, The United States and Cambodia, 1969–2000: A troubled relationship. Routledge, 2004.
R. Yaacob, “Partnership of convenience: Ream Naval Base and the Cambodia-China convergence,” Sydney, Dec. 2024. Accessed: Jan. 23, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.lowyinstitute.org/publications/partnership-convenience-ream-naval-base-cambodia-china-convergence
T. Lum, “Cambodia,” Congressional Research Service, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF10238/14
C. Cheunboran, Cambodia’s China strategy: Security dilemmas of embracing the dragon. Routledge, 2021.
S. Springer, “Violence, democracy, and the neoliberal ‘order’: The contestation of public space in post transitional Cambodia,” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, vol. 99, pp. 138–162, 2009, doi: 10.1080/00045600802555516.
K. Un, “Cambodia: Moving away from democracy?,” International Political Science Review, vol. 32, pp. 546–562, 2011, doi: 10.1177/0192512111410887.
K. Un, “Patronage politics and hybrid democracy: Political change in Cambodia, 1993-2003,” Asian Perspect., vol. 29, pp. 203–230, 2016, Accessed: Dec. 20, 2025. [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/42704507
K. Un, Cambodia: Return to authoritarianism. Cambridge University Press, 2019. doi: 10.1017/9781108558648.
K. Pak, “A Dominant Party in a Weak State How the Ruling Party in Cambodia has Managed to Stay Dominant,” Ph.D Dissertation, The Australian National University, 2011.
J. D. Ciorciari, “The variable effectiveness of hedging strategies,” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, vol. 19, pp. 523–555, 2019, doi: 10.1093/irap/lcz007.
J. D. Ciorciari and J. Haacke, “Hedging in international relations: An introduction,” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, vol. 19, pp. 367–374, 2019, doi: 10.1093/irap/lcz008.
E. Goh, “Great powers and hierarchical order in Southeast Asia: Analyzing regional security strategies,” Int. Secur., vol. 32, pp. 113–157, 2007, doi: 10.1162/isec.2008.32.3.113.
Ş. Kardaş and B. Sinkaya, “Conceptualizing Compartmentalization in International Relations: The Case Of Turkish Foreign Policy,” All Azimuth, pp. 1–22, 2025, doi: 10.20991/allazimuth.1830022.
F. Briscoe, “Paradox and Contradiction in Organizations: Introducing Two Articles on Paradox and Contradiction in Organizations,” Acad. Manag. Ann., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–3, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1080/19416520.2016.1161977.
R. Sil and P. J. Katzenstein, “Analytic eclecticism in the study of world politics: Reconfiguring problems and mechanisms across research traditions,” Perspectives on Politics, vol. 8, pp. 411–431, 2010, doi: 10.1017/S153759271000048X.
C. A. Thayer, “US Rapprochement with Laos and Cambodia,” Contemp. Southeast Asia, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 422–459, 2010, Accessed: Dec. 20, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/25798872
S. Bulut, “Cambodia-United States relations: From early encounters to post-Cold war,” in Cambodia’s foreign relations in regional and global contexts, S. U. Deth, S. Sun, and S. Bulut, Eds., Konrad Adenauer Stiftung, 2017, pp. 251–264.
C. Hughes, The political economy of Cambodia’s transition, 1991–2001. Routledge Curzon, 2003.
S. P. Marks, “Elusive justice for the Khmer Rouge: Two competing legal orders in Cambodia,” S. P. Marks, Ed., Brill, 2013, pp. 232–259.
S. Strangio, Hun Sen’s Cambodia. Yale University Press, 2020.
S. Peou, “Cambodia’s hegemonic-party system: How and why the CPP became dominant,” Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 42–60, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1177/2057891118788199.
C. Doung, W. Kang, and J. Kim, “Cambodia’s foreign policy choice during 2010 to 2020: From strategic hedging to bandwagoning,” Korean Journal of International Studies, vol. 20, pp. 55–88, 2022, doi: 10.14191/kjis.2022.20.1.55.
S. Ear, Aid dependence in Cambodia: How foreign assistance undermines democracy. Columbia University Press, 2013.
C.-C. Kuik, “How do weaker states hedge? Unpacking ASEAN states’ alignment behavior towards China,” Journal of Contemporary China, vol. 25, pp. 500–514, 2016, doi: 10.1080/10670564.2016.1152653.
G. N. Kucherenko, “Ream naval base is one of the factors of tension in relations between China and the United States,” Southeast Asia: Actual Problems of Development, vol. 4, pp. 102–109, 2023, doi: 10.31696/2072-8271-2023-4-4-102-109.
C. Bong, “Cambodia’s hedging foreign policy between the United States and China: The role of domestic politics, 1999-2019,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://krex.k-state.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/3d2ef421-c059-4454-8041-e9f2306dfe8a/content
E. Goh, “Meeting the China challenge: The U.S. in Southeast Asian regional security strategies,” East-West Center Washington, 2005. [Online]. Available: https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/8b1d6403-f890-4e4d-90f0-9fa9e708303a/content
S. Po and L. West, “Cambodian foreign policy in 2020: Chinese friends and American foes?,” 2021, pp. 92–104.
J. J. Luo and K. Un, “Cambodia in 2021: A year of ongoing domestic challenges and Western pressure,” in Southeast Asian Affairs 2022, D. Singh and T. H. Hoang, Eds., ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute, 2022, pp. 109–125.
V. Chheang, “Cambodia’s multifaceted foreign policy and agency in the making,” The Pacific Review, vol. 35, pp. 342–367, 2022, doi: 10.1080/09512748.2021.1916321.
V. Chheang, “Cambodian perspectives of the U.S. and China: A SWOT analysis,” in Southeast Asian Perspectives of the United States and China: A SWOT Analysis, J. Lee, Ed., Asan Institute for Policy Studies, 2022, pp. 16–27. Accessed: Dec. 20, 2025. [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep47431.4
S. Po and C. B. Primiano, “An ‘Ironclad Friend’: Explaining Cambodia’s bandwagoning policy towards China,” Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, vol. 39, pp. 444–464, 2020, doi: 10.1177/186810342003900307.
J. J. Luo, “Cambodia’s foreign policy (re)alignments amid great power geopolitical competition,” The Pacific Review, vol. 38, pp. 60–89, 2024, doi: 10.1080/09512748.2023.2208080.
J. Dosch, “Sovereignty rules: Human security, civil society, and the limits of liberal reform,” J. Dosch, Ed., Routledge, 2011, pp. 19–42.
J. J. Mearsheimer, The tragedy of great power politics. W. W. Norton & Company, 2001.
K. N. Waltz, Theory of international politics. Addison-Wesley, 1979.
V. Var, “Cambodia’s Strategic and Security Situation and Prospects: Implications for Defense Policy,” National Institute for Defense Studies, pp. 7–30, 2017, Accessed: Dec. 15, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.nids.mod.go.jp/english/publication/joint_research/series15/index.html
S. Walt, The origins of alliances. Cornell University Press, 1987.
R. O. Keohane and J. S. Nye, Power and interdependence: World politics in transition. Little, Brown, 1977.
M. Noland, “U.S. trade policy in the Trump administration,” Asian Economic Policy Review, vol. 13, pp. 262–278, 2018, doi: 10.1111/aepr.12224.
A. D. Ba, [Re]Negotiating East and Southeast Asia: Region, regionalism, and the association of Southeast Asian nations. Stanford University Press, 2009.
H. K. Jacobson, “The United Nations: Past, Present, and Future,” American Political Science Review, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 275–277, Mar. 1976, doi: 10.2307/1960412.
S. Levitsky and L. A. Way, Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge University Press, 2010. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511781353.
J. W. Creswell and C. N. Poth, Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches, 4th ed. SAGE, 2018.
K. Krippendorff, Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology, 4th ed. Sage Publications, 2018.
G. Guest, A. Bunce, and L. Johnson, “How many interviews are enough?,” Field methods, vol. 18, pp. 59–82, 2006, doi: 10.1177/1525822X05284492.
M. Hennink and B. N. Kaiser, “Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests,” Soc. Sci. Med., vol. 292, p. 114523, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523.
J. Creswell and D. Creswell, Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications, 2018.
M. C. Gizzi and S. Rädiker, The practice of qualitative data analysis: Research examples using MAXQDA. MAXQDA Press, 2021.
N. H. Woolf and C. Silver, Qualitative analysis using MAXQDA: The five-level QDA® method. Routledge, 2018.
L. S. Nowell, “Thematic analysis,” Int. J. Qual. Methods, vol. 16, pp. 1–13, 2017, doi: 10.1177/1609406917733847.
I. Korstjens and A. Moser, “Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing,” European Journal of General Practice, vol. 24, pp. 120–124, 2018, doi: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092.
N. Hang, “The rise of China: Challenges, implications, and options for the United States,” Indian Journal of Asian Affairs, vol. 30, no. 1/2, pp. 47–64, 2017, Accessed: Dec. 20, 2025. [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/26465816.
C.-C. Kuik, “Getting hedging right: a small-state perspective,” China International Strategy Review, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 300–315, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s42533-021-00089-5.
N. Loughlin, “Chinese linkage, leverage, and Cambodia’s transition to hegemonic authoritarianism,” democratization, vol. 28, pp. 840–857, 2021, doi: 10.1080/13510347.2021.1878905.
L. Morgenbesser, “The failure of democratization by elections in Cambodia,” Contemporary Politics, vol. 23, pp. 135–155, 2017, doi: 10.1080/13569775.2016.1264389.
L. Morgenbesser, “Cambodia’s Transition to Hegemonic Authoritarianism,” Journal of Democracy, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 158–171, 2019, doi: 10.1353/jod.2019.0012.
A. Schedler, “Elections without democracy: The menu of manipulation,” Journal of Democracy, vol. 13, pp. 36–50, 2002, doi: 10.1353/jod.2002.0024.
T. Leng and V. Chheang, “Are Cambodia-U.S. relations mendable?,” Asia Policy, vol. 28, pp. 124–133, 2021, doi: 10.1353/asp.2021.0028.
R. O. Keohane, After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton University Press, 1984.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Mathematics Instruction, Social Research and Opinion

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
















