Macan Ali In The Cirebon Glass Painting: The Study Of Ethnomathematics

Tegar Perkasa Wahyusukma; Arif Muchyidin; Indah Nursuprianah

doi:10.58421/misro.v1i1.9

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/misro.v1i1.9

Authors

Tegar Perkasa Wahyusukma SMP Negeri 5 Cibitung, West Java province
Arif Muchyidin IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
Indah Nursuprianah IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon

Keywords:

Golden Ratio, Golden Rectangles, Golden Ellipse, Macan Ali

Abstract

The research objectives are: 1) Knowing the history and development of the Macan Ali and the typical Cirebon glass painting. 2) Knowing the mathematical elements in the typical Cirebon Ali Macan glass painting. The research method used by the researcher is descriptive qualitative research with interview data collection techniques, observations, documentation and field notes. The research results are the history of the Macan Ali, which means the association of the Cirebon indigenous people who are great linuhung or holding fast to the belief of an almighty god. The mathematical element found in the Macan Ali is the golden ratio worth 1.618... . The Golden Ratio used by the researcher is the Golden Rectangle and the Golden Ellipse. First, there are 3 Golden Rectangles on the two macan eyes, the front and back legs of the Macan Ali and the formation of the tail pattern and the overall Macan Ali's difference of 0.155 and 0.164. Then, 1 Golden Ellipse is found in the shape of the Ali Macan body. Meanwhile, in typical Cirebon glass paintings, there are elements of transformation (Reflection, Translation, Dilation, and Rotation), namely, reflection or reflection on the making of the Macan Ali pattern in glass media, translation and rotation on the mega cloudy carving, and dilatation on the wadasan carving. From this research, it is hoped that this will provide readers with insight and knowledge regarding the typical Cirebon Macan Ali glass painting and the mathematical elements contained in it and can preserve the art, culture, and history through the typical Cirebon Macan Ali glass painting

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

E. Suherman, Stategi Belajar Mengajar Matematika Kontemporer. Bandung: JICA-Univesrtisa Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI), 2001.

S. Pahmi, N. Priatna, J. A. Dahlan, and A. Muchyidin, “Implementation the project-based learning using the context of Batik art in elementary mathematics learning,” J. Elem., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 373–390, 2022.

L. Andriani, A. Muchyidin, and H. Raharjo, “Frieze Group Pattern in Buyung Dance Formation,” Eduma Math. Educ. Learn. Teach., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 11–24, 2020, doi: 10.24235/eduma.v9i2.6960.

L. Andriani and A. Muchyidin, “Pola Frieze Group Pada Gerakan Tari Buyung Kuningan,” JES-MAT (Jurnal Edukasi dan Sains Mat., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 81–100, 2020.

R. Amalia, A. Muchyidin, and N. Izzati, “The Implication of Relationship between Designing Woven Motive Skills and Logical Thinking in Mathematics Learning,” J. Math. Pedagog., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2019.

A. Muchyidin, “Model Matematika Kearifan Lokal Masyarakat Desa Trusmi Dalam Menjaga Eksistensi Kerajinan Batik Tulis,” JES-MAT, vol. 2, no. 1, 2016.

A. H. Fathani, Matematika Hakikat dan Logika, 2nd ed. Yogyakarta, 2009.

P. Gerdes, “Reflections on Ethnomathematics,” Learn. Math., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 19–22, 1994, doi: 10.1145/3085228.3085284.

D’ambrosio, “FLM Publishing Association Ethnomathematics and Its Place in the History and Pedagogy of Mathematics,” Source Learn. Math., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 44–48, 1985.

Suriati, Burhanuddin, and M. J. Nur, “Da’wah in Form of Ukhuwah Islamiyah,” vol. 436, pp. 941–946, 2020, doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.200529.198.

M. A. Upal and C. M. Cusack, Handbook of Islamic Sects and Movements. Leiden: BRILL, 2021.

M. Jenkins, “Islamic Glass: A Brief History,” The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, Feb. 1986.

F. Shehu, “Methodology of Prophetic Da’Wah and Its Relevance To Contemporary Global Society,” J. Educ. Soc. Sci., vol. 6, no. February, pp. 9–17, 2017.

A. Shalem, “What do we mean when we say ‘Islamic art’? A plea for a critical rewriting of the history of the arts of Islam,” J. Art Hist., vol. 6, no. June, pp. 1–18, 2012.

A. G. Muhaimin, The Islamic Traditions of Cirebon: Ibadat and Adat Among Javanese Muslims : Ibadat and Adat Among Javanese Muslims, no. July. Canberra: ANU Press, 2006.

A. Jaelani, E. Setyawan, and N. Hasyim, “Religious Heritage Tourism and Creative Economy in Cirebon: The Diversity of Religious, Cultures and Culinary,” J. Soc. Adm. Sci., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 63–76, 2016.

A. Z. M. Raden, M. S. Andrijanto, and W. Sukarwo, “Figurative Calligraphy: Artistic, Magic, and Religious Aspect of the Cirebon Glass Painting,” Cult. Syndr., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2019, doi: 10.30998/cs.v1i1.17.

A. Hidayat, “Calligraphy in The Creative Economy Perspective Ahmad,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Economics and Banking 2015, 2015, vol. 5, pp. 435–444, doi: 10.2991/iceb-15.2015.61.

F. Nurhidayat, J. Masunah, and T. Karyono, “Arabic Calligraphy in the Art of Glass Painting From Cirebon by Raffan S. Hasyim,” vol. 519, no. Icade 2020, pp. 52–56, 2021, doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.210203.011.

C. Casta, “Glass Painting: Symbolic Power Relationship in Cultural Production and Adaptation Strategies on Cultural Involution,” vol. 271, no. Iconarc 2018, pp. 70–74, 2019, doi: 10.2991/iconarc-18.2019.71.

C. Casta, T. Rohidi, T. Triyanto, S. Syakir, and M. Syarif, “The Aestheticcode of Cirebon Glass Painting As Culture Capital In Arts Education,” no. 2005, 2020, doi: 10.4108/eai.29-6-2019.2290236.

A. A. Ahmad, Character Education in Visual Art Teaching and Learning Process. .

K. Shekhawat, “Why golden rectangle is used so often by architects: A mathematical approach,” Alexandria Eng. J., vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 213–222, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2015.03.012.

M. Akhtaruzzaman and A. A. Shafie, “Geometrical Substantiation of Phi, the Golden Ratio and the Baroque of Nature, Architecture, Design and Engineering,” Int. J. Arts, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 2012, doi: 10.5923/j.arts.20110101.01.

A. A. Shafie and M. Akhtaruzzaman, “Geometrical Substantiation of Phi , the Golden Ratio and the Baroque of Nature , Architecture , Design and Engineering,” Int. J. Arts, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 2011, doi: 10.5923/j.arts.20110101.01.

G. B. Thapa and R. Thapa, “The Relation of Golden Ratio, Mathematics and Aesthetics,” J. Inst. Eng., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 188–199, 2018, doi: 10.3126/jie.v14i1.20084.

K. Brecher, “The ‘ Φ TOP ’: A Golden Ellipsoid,” vol. 1, no. c, pp. 371–374, 2015.

A. Scimone, “Ellipse: what else?,” Math. Gaz., vol. 99, no. 546, pp. 481–490, 2015, doi: 10.1017/mag.2015.85.

T. Page, G. Thorsteinsson, and J.-G. Ha, “Natural Sections in Product Design,” Int. J. Contents, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 71–82, 2010, doi: 10.5392/ijoc.2010.6.3.071.

T. L. Fun, I. M. S. Usman, N. Utaberta, and R. Sharif, “The Importance and Potential of Golden Ratio in Architecture Design,” J. Xi’an Univ. Archit. Technol., vol. XIII, no. I, p. 477, 2021.

D. Favre, “Golden ratio ( Sectio Aurea ) in the Elliptical Honeycomb,” vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2016.

C. D. Green, “All that glitters: a review of psychological research on the aesthetics of the golden section.,” Perception, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 937–968, 1995, doi: 10.1068/p240937.

K. Elam, “Geometry of Design Studies in Proportion and Composition.” Princeton Architectural Press, New York, p. 117, 2001.