Valuing Environmental Damage as State Financial Loss in Corruption Cases: A Substantive Justice Analysis of The Harvey Moeis Verdicts

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/misro.v4i4.884

Authors

  • Laily Maghfiroh Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
  • Abdul Kholiq Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2709-0830

Keywords:

Corruption, Environmental Damage Assessment, State Financial Losses, Substantive Justice

Abstract

This study examines the regulatory framework for assessing environmental damage as a basis for establishing state financial losses in corruption cases and analyzes judicial reasoning in sentencing to realize substantive justice. It addresses a key gap in Indonesian legal practice: the absence of an integrated framework linking environmental damage valuation to state loss calculations, and the limited inclusion of ecological restoration costs in criminal sanctions. The research employs a normative juridical method, drawing on legislative, conceptual, case-based, and comparative approaches, supported by primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. Data were obtained through a literature review and limited structured interviews with environmental law experts and practitioners. Within the normative juridical framework, the interviews serve solely as supplementary secondary data to complement and confirm the normative analysis of statutory regulations, particularly to verify the adequacy and practical applicability of the legal framework governing environmental damage assessment and state financial loss calculation. Legal materials were analyzed using qualitative descriptive analysis. The findings indicate that environmental damage calculations rely on ecological components regulated under the Environmental Protection and Management Law, Ministry of Environment Regulation No. 7 of 2014, and Government Regulation No. 22 of 2021. In the sentencing of Harvey Moeis and Nur Alam, judges emphasized abuse of authority, official position, degree of culpability, and motive; however, ecological restoration costs were not systematically integrated into sentencing, thereby constraining the realization of substantive justice. This study recommends adopting a unified guideline linking environmental damage valuation to state financial losses and mandating the incorporation of environmental restoration obligations into criminal sentencing. The research is limited to two court decisions and does not include a broader empirical analysis of sentencing patterns.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. Disyahputra, “Efektifitas Pendidikan Anti Korupsi dalam Mencegah Tindak Pidana Korupsi,” J. Huk. Non Diskrim., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 87–90, 2023.

B. Waluyo, Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Strategi dan Optimalisasi. Sinar Grafika, 2022.

R. Perbianto and others, “Diskursus Perampasan Aset Sebagai Bentuk Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara Akibat Tindak Pidana Korupsi,” J. Huk. Perjuangan, vol. 4, no. 1, 2025.

C. A. Astuti and A. Chariri, “Penentuan Kerugian Keuangan Negara yang Dilakukan Oleh BPK dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi,” Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis, Universitas Diponegoro, 2015.

A. Febrian, “Analisis Hukum Potensi Kerugian Negara (Potential Loss) yang Disebabkan Kerusakan Lingkungan (Studi Kasus Harvey Moeis) Berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 25/PUU-XIV/2016,” 2025.

W. Febrianto and others, “Dalil Kerusakan Lingkungan Hidup sebagai Dasar Pemenuhan Unsur Kerugian Negara dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi,” Ma’mal J. Lab. Syariah dan Huk., vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 445–463, 2023.

Pengadilan Tinggi DKI Jakarta, “Putusan Nomor 16/Pid.Sus-TPK/2018/PT.DKI.” 2018.

Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat, “Putusan Nomor 70/Pid.Sus-TPK/2024/PN JKT.PST.” 2024.

Indonesia Corruption Watch, Implementasi dan Pengaturan Valuasi Kerugian Ekologis dalam Perhitungan Kerugian Negara di Perkara Korupsi Sektor Industri Ekstraktif. Jakarta: Indonesia Corruption Watch, 2022.

R. Tahir and others, Metodologi Penelitian Bidang Hukum: Suatu Pendekatan Teori dan Praktik. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia, 2023.

I. M. P. Diantha, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif dalam Justifikasi Teori Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia, “Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 22 Tahun 2021 tentang Penyelenggaraan Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup.” 2021.

K. Amri, “Wawancara mengenai AMDAL dan Kerugian Lingkungan.” Oct. 2025.

S. W. Utomo and others, Pengertian, Ruang Lingkup Ekologi dan Ekosistem. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka, 2012.

B. H. Saharjo, “Bagaimana Menghitung Kerugian Lingkungan dalam Korupsi.” Feb. 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.forestdigest.com/detail/2706/perhitungan-kerugian-lingkungan-korupsi

H. Hajawa, “Pengembangan Hutan Kota Berbasis Valuasi Ekonomi (Studi Kasus Kota Makassar),” Universitas Hasanuddin, 2018.

Z. Hanyfah and others, “Analisis Penghitungan Kerugian Negara Dari Hasil Dugaan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Yang Dilakukan Oleh PT. Timah (Tbk),” J. Law Nation, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 351–358, 2024.

Hermansyah, “Sistem Pembuktian Pada Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Rangka Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Indonesia,” UNES J. Swara Justisia, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 95–102, 2020.

A. Chazawi, Hukum Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Edisi Revisi). Media Nusa Creative (MNC Publishing), 2021.

B. Nugroho, “Peranan Alat Bukti Dalam Perkara Pidana Dalam Putusan Hakim Menurut KUHAP,” Yuridika, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 17–36, 2017.

F. Afandi and others, “Penggunaan Bukti Ilmiah dan Penerapan Prinsip Kehati-hatian dalam Putusan Perkara Pidana Materiil Lingkungan Hidup di Indonesia Tahun 2009–2020,” J. Huk. Lingkung. Indones., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 77–120, 2022.

H. Abdurrachman, R. A. Nugraha, and N. Majestya, Palu Hakim Versus Rasa Keadilan: Sebuah Pengantar Disparitas Putusan Hakim Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Deepublish, 2020.

A. Sulistiyono, “Independensi Hakim Dalam Berbagai Disparitas Putusan Perkara Korupsi Di Mahkamah Agung,” Fundam. J. Ilm. Huk., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 47–70, 2024.

B. Marpaung, “Memahami Pemenuhan Unsur Perbuatan Korupsi yang Merugikan Keuangan Negara dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi,” Indones. J. Nalar Keadilan, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 12–28, 2022.

E. Enriansyah and others, “Kerusakan Lingkungan Sebagai Kerugian Keuangan Negara dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi,” Juridische J. Penelit. Huk., vol. 2, pp. 91–105, 2025.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2025-12-21

How to Cite

[1]
L. Maghfiroh and A. Kholiq, “Valuing Environmental Damage as State Financial Loss in Corruption Cases: A Substantive Justice Analysis of The Harvey Moeis Verdicts”, J.Math.Instr.Soc.Res.Opin., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1389–1404, Dec. 2025.

Issue

Section

Articles