Exploring Creative Thinking in Solving Open-Ended Statistical Problems: A Descriptive Study of Grade 12 Learners at SMA Negeri 14 Jambi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/misro.v4i4.789

Authors

Keywords:

Creative thinking, statistics, open-ended problem, Learning mathematics

Abstract

This study examines the creative thinking of Grade 12 students in solving open-ended statistical problems. The research addresses the problem of limited understanding of how students with different mathematical ability levels demonstrate creative thinking when working with open-ended statistical tasks, and aims to describe the fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration reflected in their solutions. Three students representing high, medium, and low achievement levels were selected through purposive sampling to capture varied mathematical abilities. Data were collected through written tests and interviews, and analyzed using indicators of fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration. An exploratory, qualitative approach was employed to gain in-depth insights into students’ reasoning processes. Results show that the high-achieving student generated two valid datasets (mean = 25, median = 23, mode = 20), the medium-achieving student produced one nearly accurate dataset (mean = 24.9), and the low-achieving student produced a dataset with a mean of 23.5. For the second problem, all students obtained b = 12, but only the high-achieving student justified why it is the minimum. In the third problem, all calculated the average yield as 1.225 tons, yet only the high-achieving student provided a contextual interpretation. These findings indicate that open-ended tasks reveal clear differences in students’ creative thinking. The results suggest that incorporating open-ended problems into statistics lessons can enhance students’ creative mathematical reasoning and support the development of higher-order thinking.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. PISA 2022 Creative Thinking Framework. 2022.

Beghetto RA. Creative Learning: A Fresh Look. J Cogn Educ Psychol 2016;15:6. https://doi.org/10.1891/1945-8959.15.1.6.

Silver EA. Conclusion: Mathematics Problem Posing and Problem Solving: Some Reflections on Recent Advances and New Opportunities. In: Toh TL, Santos-Trigo M, Chua PH, Abdullah NA, Zhang D, editors., Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore; 2023, p. 247–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7205-0_14.

Leikin R. Exploring Mathematical Creativity Using Multiple Solution Tasks. Creat Math Educ Gift sSudents 2009;9:129–45. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087909352_010.

Rizos I, Gkrekas N. Incorporating History of Mathematics in Open-Ended Problem Solving: An Empirical Study. Eurasia J Math Sci Technol Educ 2023;19:em2242. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13025.

Levenson ES, Dasuqi A. Exploring Group Work on Open-Ended Geometrical Tasks: Face-to-Face and Online. Int J Sci Math Educ 2024:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10532-9.

Kwon ON, Park JH, Park JS. Cultivating divergent thinking in mathematics through an open-ended approach. Asia Pacific Educ Rev 2006;7:51–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03036784.

Wright C, Meng Q, Breshock MR, Atta L, Taub MA, Jager LR, et al. Open Case Studies: Statistics and Data Science Education through Real-World Applications. J Stat Data Sci Educ 2024;32:331–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/26939169.2024.2394541.

Sadak M, Incikabi L, Ulusoy F, Pektas M. Investigating Mathematical Creativity Through The Connection Between Creative Abilities in Problem Posing and Problem Solving. Think Ski Creat 2022;45:101108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101108.

Prabawanto S. Improving Prospective Mathematics Teachers Reversible Thinking Ability Through a Metacognitive-Approach Teaching. Eurasia J Math Sci Technol Educ 2023;19:1–13. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13201.

Frarisia T, Prabawanto S, Kustiawan C. Students’ Reversible Thinking Ability in Solving Quadrilateral Problems. J Pendidik MIPA 2024;25:542–53. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v25i2.pp542-553.

Pebrianti A, Juandi D, Nurlaelah E. Reversible Thinking Ability in Solving Mathematics Problems. J Cendekia J Pendidik Mat 2022;7:163–73. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i1.1905.

Amalia DR, Theis R, Marlina M. Analisis Kemampuan Reversible Thinking Matematis Siswa pada Materi Persamaan Linear Satu Variabel. J Pendidik Mipa 2024;14:212–23. https://doi.org/10.37630/jpm.v14i1.1502.

Sriraman B. The Characteristics of Mathematical Creativity. ZDM Math Educ 2009;41:13–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0114-z.

Lithner J. A research framework for creative and imitative reasoning. Educ Stud Math 2008;67:255–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-007-9104-2.

Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. SAGE Publications; 2016.

Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta; 2013.

Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldana J. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. SAGE Publications; 2018.

Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. SAGE Publications; 2017.

Saldana J. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. SAGE Publications; 2021.

Patton MQ. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice. SAGE Publications; 2014.

Sherly Ida Amitha. Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Siswa pada Soal Open-Ended Materi Statistika Ditinjau dari Tingkat Sense of Humor Kelas XI SMKN 5 Jember. Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember, 2023.

Leikin R, Pitta-Pantazi D. Creativity and Mathematics Education: The State of The Art. ZDM Math Educ 2013;45:159–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0459-1.

Sumantri V, Ristontowi R. Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Siswa melalui Model Reciprocal Teaching dan Problem Based Learning (PBL) di SMA. J Pendidik Mat Raflesia 2020;5:26–34. https://doi.org/10.33369/jpmr.v5i3.11503.

Rahmatin T, Dahlan JA, Jupri A. Students’ Mathematical Creative Thinking and Learning Obstacles in Solving Ill-Structured Exponential Problems. J Didakt Mat 2025;12:53–74. https://doi.org/10.24815/jdm.v12i1.43834.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2025-11-24

How to Cite

[1]
M. M. Putri, R. Rohati, and D. S. Nusantara, “Exploring Creative Thinking in Solving Open-Ended Statistical Problems: A Descriptive Study of Grade 12 Learners at SMA Negeri 14 Jambi”, J.Math.Instr.Soc.Res.Opin., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1229–1242, Nov. 2025.

Issue

Section

Articles