Creative Thinking Process and Brain Dominance: Divergent and Convergent Thinking in Originality and Elaboration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58421/misro.v4i4.661Keywords:
Brain Dominance, Convergent Thinking, Creative Thinking Process, Divergent Thinking, Originality and ElaborationAbstract
The creative thinking process results from the interaction between divergent and convergent thinking, which complement each other and are influenced by brain hemisphere dominance in processing information. The emphasis on originality and elaboration in this process demonstrates that each individual possesses unique problem-solving tendencies, making them worthy of focus in educational research. This study aims to describe the processes of divergent and convergent thinking in mathematical creative thinking, with a focus on originality and elaboration based on brain dominance. The research method employed was qualitative, with a descriptive and exploratory approach. The sample consisted of 3 students, selected for in-depth analysis from a total of 31 students. The instruments used were mathematical creative thinking, brain dominance tests, and unstructured interviews. Data were analyzed through data reduction, presentation, and conclusion. The study's results showed that students with left-brain dominance relied more on convergent thinking processes when solving problems. Conversely, students with right-brain dominance tend to prioritize divergent thinking. Students with balanced brain dominance showed a relatively balanced ability in using both thinking patterns. These findings provide educators with an overview of how to design questions that encourage thinking processes involving both divergent and convergent thinking, tailored to students’ brain dominance, to optimize learning outcomes.
Downloads
References
R. S. Yohanes, “Proses Berpikir Dua Siswa SMP dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau dari Dominasi Otak Kiri dan Otak Kanan,” Widya War., vol. 27, no. 01, pp. 1–18, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/documents/detail/116789
V. D. Shadrikov, S. S. Kurginyan, and O. V. Martynova, “Psychological studies of thought: Thoughts about a concept of thought,” Psychol. J. High. Sch. Econ., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 558–575, 2016, doi: 10.17323/1813-8918-2016-3-558-575.
Y. O. Wulandari, “Proses Berpikir Aljabar Siswa Berdasarkan Taksonomi Marzano,” Tesis, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia, 2014. [Online]. Available: http://karya-ilmiah.um.ac.id/index.php/disertasi/article/view/36027
M. Botella, F. Zenasni, and T. Lubart, “What are the stages of the creative process? What visual art students are saying,” Front. Psychol., vol. 9, no. 2266, pp. 1–13, 2018, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02266.
B. Trilling and C. Fadel, 21 St Century Skills. San Fransisco, California: Jossey Bass, 2009.
A. Cropley, “In Praise of Convergent Thinking,” Creat. Res. J., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 391–404, 2006, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1803_13.
D. R. Brophy, “Understanding, measuring, and enhancing collective creative problem-solving efforts,” Creat. Res. J., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 199–229, 1998, doi: 10.1207/s15326934crj1103_2.
B. Sriraman, “The characteristics of mathematical creativity,” Math. Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 19–34, 2004, doi: 10.1007/s11858-008-0114-z.
M. Savic, “Mathematical problem-solving via wallas’ four stages of creativity: Implications for the undergraduate classroom,” Math. Enthus., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 255–278, 2016, doi: 10.54870/1551-3440.1377.
B. Sukmaangara and S. T. Madawistama, “Divergent Thinking and Convergent Thinking in the Mathematical Creative Thinking Process in terms of Student Brain Dominance,” Southeast Asian Math. Educ. J., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 53–66, 2021, doi: 10.46517/seamej.v11i1.115.
A. Athanassios and B. Vasiliki, “Developing and Piloting a Pedagogy for Teaching Innovation , Collaboration , and Co-Creation in Secondary Education Based on Design Thinking, Digital Transformation, and Enterpreneurship,” Educ. Sci., vol. 9, no. 113, pp. 1–11, 2019, doi: doi:10.3390/educsci9020113.
T. Lindberg, R. Gumienny, B. Jobst, and C. Meinel, “Is there a Need for a Design Thinking Process?,” in Proceedings of Design Thinking Research Symposium 8 (Design 2010), Sydney: Australia: DTRS8 Interpreting Design Thinking, 2010, pp. 243–254. [Online]. Available: https://hpi.de/fileadmin/user_upload/fachgebiete/meinel/papers/Design_Thinking/2010_Lindberg_Design.pdf
E. Susantini, Isnawati, and L. Lisdiana, “Effectiveness of genetics student worksheet to improve creative thinking skills of teacher candidate students,” J. Sci. Educ., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 74–79, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/310254538_Effectiveness_of_genetics_student_worksheet_to_improve_creative_thinking_skills_of_teacher_candidate_students
R. Lince, “Creative Thinking Ability to Increase Student Mathematical of Junior High School by Applying Models Numbered Heads Together,” J. Educ. Pract., vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 206–212, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1092494.pdf
U. Munandar, Pengembangan Kreativitas Anak Berbakat. Jakarta: Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2014.
A. Saida, M. Ikram, and Salwah, “Analysis of Students’ Creative Thinking in Solving Cuboid Problems,” Int. J. Progress. Math. Educ., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 104–116, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.22236/ijopme.v1i2.7307.
Y. Wang and Q. Hou, “Insight or Originality: A Spray in the River of Creative Thinking,” Open Access Libr. J., vol. 05, no. 09, pp. 1–6, 2018, doi: 10.4236/oalib.1104847.
R. Rothenberg and C. R. Hausman, The creativity question. Durham, 1976.
M. A. Runco, “Creativity Research: Originality, Utility, and Integration,” Creat. Res. J., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 1988, doi: 10.1080/10400418809534283.
E. P. Torrance, The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking-Norms-Technical Manual Research Edition-Verbal Tests, Forms A and B – Figural Tests, Forms A and B. Pronceton: Pronceton: Personnel Press, 1966.
E. P. Torrance, Torrance Test of Creative Thinking: Norms-Technical Manual. Bensenville: Bensenville: Scholastic Testing Service, 1974.
E. P. Torrance, Torrance Test of Creative Thinking. Manual for Scoring and Interpreting Results. Bensenville: Bensenville: Scholastic Testing Service, 1990.
M. A. Runco and G. J. Jaeger, “The Standard Definition of Creativity,” Creat. Res. J., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 92–96, 2012, doi: 10.1080/10400419.2012.650092.
D. K. Simonton, “Creative Productivity: A Predictive and Explanatory Model of Career Trajectories and Landmarks,” Psychol. Rev., vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 66–89, 1997, doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.104.1.66.
C. M. Mottweiler and M. Taylor, “Elaborated role play and creativity in preschool age children,” Psychol. Aesthetics, Creat. Arts, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 277–286, 2014, doi: 10.1037/a0036083.
Haryanto, “Pembelajaran Konstruktivistik Meningkatkan Cara Berpikir Divergen Siswa Sd,” J. Penelit. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 36–43, 2015, doi: 10.21831/jpipfip.v8i1.4927.
J. Geske, “Teaching Creativity For Right Brain and Left Brain Thinkers [Presented],” in The Annual Meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Quebec: Canada: AEJMC Adversiting Division, 1992, pp. 1–11. [Online]. Available: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED349600.pdf
R. Hidayatullah, “Kreativitas dalam Pendidikan Musik : Berpikir Divergen dan Konvergen,” Musikolastika, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2020, doi: 10.7592/musikolastika.v2i1.32.
S. Rawlings, Bruce et al., “Divergent thinking is linked with convergent thinking; implications for models of creativity,” Think. Reason., pp. 1–23, 2025, doi: 10.1080/13546783.2025.2485059.
Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Edisi 3. Bandung, Indonesia: Bandung: Alfabeta, 2017.
J. B. Tendero, “Hemispheric Dominance and Language Proficiency Levels in the Four Macro Skills of the Western Mindanao State University College Students,” Western Mindanao State University, Filipina, 2000. doi: 10.4324/9781003233961-9.
M. B. Miles and A. M. Huberman, “Qualitative Data Analysis: an expanded sourcebook,” 1994, California: SAGE Publications, California, Amerika. [Online]. Available: https://vivauniversity.files.wordpress.com/2013/11/milesandhuberman1994.pdf
Haryanto, “Pengembangan Cara Berpikir Divergen-Konvergen Sebagai Isu Kritis Dalam Proses Pembelajaran,” Maj. Ilm. Pembelajaran, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2006.
I. Munawaroh and Haryanto, “Neuroscience Dalam Pembelajaran,” Maj. Ilm. Pembelajaran, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 116–127, 2005, [Online]. Available: Majalah Ilmiah Pembelajaran nomor 1, Vol. 1 Mei 2005
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Mathematics Instruction, Social Research and Opinion
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
SideBar
| Accreditation Certificate |
 |
| Indexing |
Contact Us
visitor
| Information |
>> For Authors
>> For Readers
>> For Librarians
| Visitor Statistics |
| Member of |
| Announcement |
| Keywords |
Mathematics Learning Difficulty Dyscalculia Teacher perceptions personality ICT Learning Computer teaching Academic Fisherfolks Economic Behavior Probit Models matrix mathematical model Concepts Guided Note Taking Golden Ratio Philosophy Integrated Learning van Hiele geometry Assessment Learning Outcomes method skills Problem Solving Experiment
| License |
MISRO is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
| Publisher |
Address:
Jl. Gagak N0.105, Bandung,
Indonesia 40133
E-mail:
journalmisro@gmail.com
| in collaboration with |
| Recommended Tools |
| ISSN Barcode |
