Application of the Promethee II Method for Determining Road Improvement Priorities

Mayang Sari; Kosim Kosim; Andika Saputra

doi:10.58421/misro.v2i1.56

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/misro.v2i1.56

Authors

Mayang Sari Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Komputer Poltek Cirebon
Kosim Kosim Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Komputer Poltek Cirebon
Andika Saputra Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Komputer Poltek Cirebon

Keywords:

Road, Criteria, Decision Support System, Promethee II

Abstract

The road is an infrastructure that is often passed by the community. If there is damage, it will significantly disrupt community activities; for example, road conditions become jammed. This is necessary for the Public Works and Spatial Planning Office of the City of Cirebon to handle the road repairs, but in carrying out repair planning, there are obstacles, one of which is the difficulty in determining priority for road repairs with limited funds from the center. This research decision support system using the Promethee II method aims to find accurate results that are useful in determining priority road repairs that will be selected for repair. The criteria used in this study are Section Length, Road Width, Damage Condition, Traffic Volume (LHR), and Road Access. The results of this study selected Jalan A1 as an alternative that had the highest rating level of 0.613333333, and this indicated that this road was a road that had to be prioritized for repair. The test results show that the Promethee II method can produce priority recommendations for road improvements based on the required criteria.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bayu Pangestu, Kosim, and Asep Kosasih, “Application of Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) Method for the Selection of Youth Red Cross Chairperson at SMA Negeri 1 Lebakwangi Kuningan,” J. Gen. Educ. Humanit., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 83–94, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.58421/gehu.v1i2.18.

K. Kosim, “Application Ability of Students in Integrated Computer-Aided Numerical Analysis Learning,” J. Math. Instr. Soc. Res. Opin., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 54–62, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.58421/misro.v1i1.11.

S. Dash, S. K. Shakyawar, M. Sharma, and S. Kaushik, “Big data in healthcare: management, analysis and future prospects,” J. Big Data, vol. 6, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1186/s40537-019-0217-0.

B. Calzon, “Management Reporting Best Practices & Report Examples,” 2022. https://www.datapine.com/blog/management-reporting-best-practices-and-examples/ (accessed Dec. 21, 2022).

J. Zall, K. Ray, and C. Rist, “THE WORLD BANK Ten Steps Ten Steps to a Results-Based Monitoring and Evaluation System to a Results-Based Monitoring and Evaluation System.”

G. Stoneburner, A. Goguen, and A. Feringa, “Risk Management Guide for Information Technology Systems Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology.”

M. Muhammad, N. Safriadi, N. Prihartini, J. Prof, H. H. Nawawi, and K. Barat, “Implementasi Metode Simple Additive Weighting ( SAW ) pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dalam Menentukan Prioritas Perbaikan Jalan,” vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 223–228, 2017.

S. R. Nasution, S. Aripin, and M. Sianturi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Prioritas Lokasi Perbaikan Jalan Dengan Metode Preference Selection Index ( PSI ) ( Studi Kasus : Dinas Bina Marga ),” vol. 10, pp. 38–45, 2021.

S. R. Ningsih and A. P. Windarto, “Penerapan Metode Promethee II pada Dosen Penerima Hibah P2M Internal,” InfoTekJar (Jurnal Nas. Inform. dan Teknol. Jaringan), vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 20–25, 2018, doi: 10.30743/infotekjar.v3i1.641.

E. Novida, H. Sunandar, and I. Pendahuluan, “Sistem pendukung keputusan pemilihan produk lensa kacamata menggunakan metode promethee ii,” vol. 6, pp. 325–332, 2018.

C. Sitinjak, N. A. Hasibuan, and R. Syahputra, “SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PEMILIHAN FINALIS DUTA BAHASA SUMATERA UTARA DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE PROMETHEE II ( STUDI KASUS : BALAI BAHASA SUMATERA UTARA ),” vol. 3, pp. 499–507, 2019, doi: 10.30865/komik.v3i1.1633.

J. P. Brans and P. Vincke, “A Preference Ranking Organisation Method: (The PROMETHEE Method for Multiple Criteria. Decision-Making),” Manage. Sci., vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 647–656, Jun. 1985, doi: 10.1287/mnsc.31.6.647.

M. Behzadian, R. B. Kazemzadeh, A. Albadvi, and M. Aghdasi, “PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 200, no. 1, pp. 198–215, Jan. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.021.

R. A. da Cunha, L. A. D. Rangel, C. A. Rudolf, and L. dos Santos, “A decision support approach employing the PROMETHEE method and risk factors for critical supply assessment in large-scale projects,” Oper. Res. Perspect., vol. 9, p. 100238, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.orp.2022.100238.

S. Zhaoxu and H. Min, “Multi-criteria Decision Making Based on PROMETHEE Method,” in 2010 International Conference on Computing, Control and Industrial Engineering, 2010, pp. 416–418, doi: 10.1109/CCIE.2010.110.

L. Oubahman and S. Duleba, “Review of PROMETHEE method in transportation,” Prod. Eng. Arch., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 69–74, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.30657/pea.2021.27.9.

J. W. Creswell, Research design : qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 4th ed. Nebraska: SAGE Publications, Inc, 2014.

S. Gorard, “Mixed Methods in Educational Research,” 2012.

H. Taherdoost, “Sampling Methods in Research Methodology; How to Choose a Sampling Technique for Research,” SSRN Electron. J., Apr. 2016, doi: 10.2139/SSRN.3205035.

G. Gilquin and M. Paquot, “Finding one’s voice in losing it. Learner academic writing and medium variation,” 2008, doi: 10.1155/2013/704806.

J. P. Byrnes and D. C. Miller, “The relative importance of predictors of math and science achievement: An opportunity-propensity analysis,” Contemp. Educ. Psychol., vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 599–629, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.09.002.

J.-P. Brans and B. Mareschal, “Promethee Methods,” in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 163–186.

P. Verma, “Promethee,” 2020, pp. 282–309.

L. Abdullah, W. Chan, and A. Afshari, “Application of PROMETHEE method for green supplier selection: a comparative result based on preference functions,” J. Ind. Eng. Int., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 271–285, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s40092-018-0289-z.