The Effect of Application of Creative Problem Solving Learning Methods on Students' Mathematics Learning Outcomes

Dariah; Toto Syatori Nasehudin; Arif Muchyidin

doi:10.58421/misro.v1i2.24

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/misro.v1i2.24

Authors

Dariah IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
Toto Syatori Nasehudin IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
Arif Muchyidin IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon

Keywords:

Creative Problem Solving, Mathematics learning outcomes, Experimental

Abstract

This study aims to determine: 1) Student responses after the application of the Creative Problem Solving learning method; 2) Students' mathematics learning outcomes after using the Creative Problem Solving learning method; 3) Whether or not there are differences and the influence of the application of the Creative Problem Solving learning method on students' mathematics learning outcomes. This research is an experimental type of research, namely research that is used to find the effect of specific treatments on others under controlled conditions. The experiment was carried out with the object of research consisting of the experimental and control classes. The researcher used class X IPS 1 as the experimental class, which consisted of 30 students, and class X IPS 2 as the control class, which consisted of 32 students. Sampling was done by random cluster sampling. The results showed that the student's response to applying the Creative Problem Solving learning method was reasonable based on the results of the questionnaire data recapitulation, which showed an average number of 77.39% and was in solid criteria. Student learning outcomes by applying the Creative Problem Solving learning method are included in the excellent category, with the average score obtained by the experimental class students of 88.50. There were 29 students out of 30 who scored above the KKM set by the school, which was 67. Meanwhile, the average score for the control class only reached 76.75. The results of the t-test show differences in student learning outcomes using the Creative Problem Solving learning method with those using ordinary or conventional learning methods with a correlation value of 0.404, which can be said to have a moderate effect

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Sukmadinata, Metode penenelitian pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2010.

A. N. Ameliani, “Students ’ Difficulties in Grammar of Seventh Grade Junior High School 1 Magelang,” Conf. English Lang. Lit., 2019.

S. Pokhrel and R. Chhetri, “A Literature Review on Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Teaching and Learning,” High. Educ. Futur., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 133–141, 2021, doi: 10.1177/2347631120983481.

I. Ketut Sudarsana, I. Bagus Made Anggara Putra, I. Nyoman Temon Astawa, and I. Wayan Lali Yogantara, “The use of Google classroom in the learning process,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1175, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1175/1/012165.

I. Tuomi, The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Learning, Teaching, and Education Policies. 2018.

C. Coman, L. G. Țîru, L. Meseșan-Schmitz, C. Stanciu, and M. C. Bularca, “Online teaching and learning in higher education during the coronavirus pandemic: Students’ perspective,” Sustain., vol. 12, no. 24, pp. 1–22, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su122410367.

I. H. Bisri and A. Muchyidin, “Mathematics on Cirebon Woven Fabric with Lanang Motifs,” J. Math. Instr. Soc. Res. Opin. (MISRO, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2022.

I. Perasutiyo, A. Muchyidin, and I. Nursuprianah, “Golden Ratio and the Meaning of the Wayang Kulit Gunungan Philosophy,” J. Math. Instr. Soc. Res. Opin. (MISRO, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 41–53, 2022.

Kosim, “Application Ability of Students in Integrated Computer-Aided Numerical Analysis Learning,” J. Math. Instr. Soc. Res. Opin. (MISRO, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 54–62, 2022.

T. P. Wahyusukma, A. Muchyidin, and I. Nursuprianah, “Macan Ali In The Cirebon Glass Painting : The Study Of Ethnomathematics,” J. Math. Instr. Soc. Res. Opin. (MISRO, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 27–40, 2022.

K. Sadiyah, A. Muchyidin, and N. Izzati, “Application of Collaborative Teamwork Learning Model and Guided Note Taking Model and Their Influence on Students ’ Ability to Understand Mathematical Concepts,” J. Math. Instr. Soc. Res. Opin. (MISRO, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 14–26, 2022.

Purwanto, Evaluasi hasil belajar. Yogyakatra: Pustaka Pelajar, 2011.

Rusmono, Strategi Pembelajaran dengan Problem Based Learning itu Perlu: untuk meningkatkan Profesionalitas Guru. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia, 2012.

K. A. Rahman, M. Muspawi, M. Muazza, and P. F. Kurniawan, “Increasing Learning Outcomes Among Primary School Students By Using Classroom Management,” Lentera Pendidik. J. Ilmu Tarb. dan Kegur., vol. 22, no. 2, p. 193, 2019, doi: 10.24252/lp.2019v22n2i1.

M. Mahajan and M. K. S. Singh, “Importance and Benefits of Learning Outcomes,” IOSR J. Humanit. Soc. Sci., vol. 22, no. 03, pp. 65–67, 2017, doi: 10.9790/0837-2203056567.

N. Fajar, “Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Problem Solving terhadap Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa pada Pokok Bahasan Segitiga,” IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon, 2011.

M. Huda, Model-model Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2013.

H. Tambunan, “The Effectiveness of the Problem Solving Strategy and the Scientific Approach to Students’ Mathematical Capabilities in High Order Thinking Skills,” Int. Electron. J. Math. Educ., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 293–302, 2019, doi: 10.29333/iejme/5715.

M. Aydoğdu and M. F. Ayaz, “The Importance of Problem Solving in Mathematics Curriculum,” e-Journal New World Sci. Acad., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 61–64, 2008.

A. Anggara and M. Aziza, “Problem Solving Oriented Mathematics Curriculum,” J. Equ. Teor. dan Penelit. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 102–117, 2020.

M. Aydogdu and M. F. Ayaz, “The importance of problem solving in mathematics curriculum,” Phys. Sci., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 538–547, 2008.

W. A. P. Susanti, T. Muis, and E. P. Sartinah, “Creative Problem Solving Training to Enhance Students Problem Solving Skills on Career Issues,” vol. 462, no. Isgc 2019, pp. 6–10, 2020, doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.200814.002.

L. Heliawati, I. I. Afakillah, and I. D. Pursitasari, “Creative problem-solving learning through open-ended experiment for students’ understanding and scientific work using online learning,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 321–336, 2021, doi: 10.29333/iji.2021.14419a.

F. A. Nisa and H. Nasrudin, “Development of Student Worksheet with Guided Inquiry to Train High Order Thinking Skills on the Reaction Rate Materials,” Prism. Sains J. Pengkaj. Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Mat. dan IPA IKIP Mataram, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 69, 2022, doi: 10.33394/j-ps.v10i1.4780.

Y. H. Chang, Y. C. Yan, and Y. Te Lu, “Effects of Combining Different Collaborative Learning Strategies with Problem-Based Learning in a Flipped Classroom on Program Language Learning,” Sustain., vol. 14, no. 9, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14095282.

A. Malik, V. Vitriani, and M. M. Chusni, “Improving Students’ Critical-Thinking Skills Through Student Facilitator and Explaining Model in Momentum and Impulse Topic,” J. Penelit. Pengemb. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 55–64, 2018, doi: 10.21009/1.04202.

Sutama, S. Narimo, H. J. Prayitno, S. Anif, and D. P. Sari, “Mathematical collaborative learning in 21 stcentury based on national science olympiad in junior high school,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1836, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1836/1/012046.

H. Hanifah, “Practicality test of student worksheet (SWS) based on: Action, Process, Object, Schema (APOS model) assisted on Geogebra the subject of Riemann sum,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1731, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1731/1/012035.

Y. Q. Yusuf, Y. Natsir, and L. Hanum, “A teacher’s experience in teaching with student teams-achievement division (STAD) technique,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 99–112, 2015, doi: 10.12973/iji.2015.828a.