Criminal Law Reform for Wildlife Protection Based on Ecological Justice: A Normative Legal Approach in Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/misro.v5i3.1810

Authors

  • Benny Karya Limantara Universitas Bandar Lampung

Keywords:

Biodiversity protection, Ecological justice, Environmental criminal law, Intergenerational equity, Legal reform

Abstract

Indonesia's exceptional biodiversity is increasingly threatened by wildlife crime, while the legal framework established under Act No. 5 of 1990 has become inadequate for addressing contemporary ecological challenges. Although previous studies have identified weaknesses in wildlife law enforcement, few have translated ecological justice into concrete principles for reforming Indonesian wildlife criminal law. This study examines the urgency of wildlife criminal law reform and develops an ecocentric framework grounded in ecological justice. It employs normative (doctrinal) legal research, using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches grounded in legislation, international legal instruments, judicial decisions, scholarly literature, and institutional reports. Legal materials were analysed qualitatively through grammatical, systematic, teleological, evaluative, and prescriptive reasoning. The findings reveal that outdated legal provisions, disproportionate sanctions, fragmented institutions, and limited recognition of ecological integrity as a protected legal interest constrain the current framework. Comparative analysis highlights the importance of aggravated offences, corporate liability, confiscation and restoration orders, proportionate sanctions, and specialised wildlife crime units. The study concludes that Indonesian wildlife criminal law should adopt an ecocentric approach integrating ecological justice into offence structures, sanctions, and institutional mechanisms. This study contributes a normative framework for strengthening Indonesian criminal law reform and biodiversity protection through ecologically oriented wildlife governance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

R. A. Mittermeier and C. G. Mittermeier, Megadiversity: Earth's Biologically Wealthiest Nations. Mexico City, Mexico: CEMEX, 1997.

R. Kumar, R. Karmakar, N. Singh, D. Verma, P. Gururani, and D. Mitra, “Forest and wetland conservation in a changing climate: Global trends and local actions,” Environment Conservation Journal, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 1521–1534, 2025, doi: 10.36953/ECJ.39672025.

S. D. Sasmito et al., “Half of land use carbon emissions in Southeast Asia can be mitigated through peat swamp forest and mangrove conservation and restoration,” Nature Communications, vol. 16, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-55892-0.

W. Steffen et al., “Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet,” Science, vol. 347, no. 6223, Art. no. 1259855, 2015, doi: 10.1126/science.1259855.

IPBES, Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Bonn, Germany: Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, 2019. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3831673.

Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Global Biodiversity Outlook 5. Montreal, Canada: Convention on Biological Diversity, 2020.

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), World Wildlife Crime Report: Trafficking in Protected Species. Vienna, Austria: United Nations, 2020.

T. Wyatt, Wildlife Trafficking: A Deconstruction of the Crime, the Victims, and the Offenders. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2022.

Agus and Aditiarman, “Organised crime in the trade of endangered fauna: A study of environmental law and criminal law policies and their enforcement in Indonesia,” Jurnal Sosial, Sains, Terapan dan Riset (Sosateris), vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 48–56, 2025.

J. Chavez et al., “Illegal wildlife trade in a tourism and biodiversity hotspot,” Sustainable Development, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 9106–9122, 2025, doi: 10.1002/sd.70129.

W. Lin, K. R. Mao, and X. Zhao, “Before and beyond the pandemic: Dynamics of illegal marine wildlife trade in southern China amidst policy shifts and enforcement efforts,” Global Ecology and Conservation, vol. 60, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03622.

J. Phelps, D. Biggs, and E. L. Webb, “Tools and terms for understanding illegal wildlife trade,” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 479–489, 2016, doi: 10.1002/fee.1325.

R. Duffy, F. A. V. St John, B. Büscher, and D. Brockington, “Toward a new understanding of the links between poverty and illegal wildlife hunting,” Conservation Biology, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 14–22, 2016, doi: 10.1111/cobi.12622.

B. M. Marshall et al., “The magnitude of legal wildlife trade and implications for species survival,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 122, no. 2, 2025, doi: 10.1073/pnas.2410774121.

V. L. Williams et al., “Pan-African review of cultural uses of carnivores,” PLoS ONE, vol. 20, no. 3, 2025, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315903.

A. Nurse, Policing Wildlife: Perspectives on the Enforcement of Wildlife Legislation. London, U.K.: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.

E. Jones, “No future for future generations: Who is international environmental law for?,” Journal of Human Rights and the Environment, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 4–48, 2025, doi: 10.4337/jhre.2025.0005.

A. Longo, “Beyond climate change obligations,” International Community Law Review, vol. 27, nos. 1–2, pp. 112–135, 2025, doi: 10.1163/18719732-BJA10140.

S. Sebuliba and K. G. Sammler, “Governing biodiversity: Ambiguity and fragmentation in the BBNJ Agreement,” Ocean and Coastal Management, vol. 270, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107913.

D. P. van Vuuren et al., “Exploring pathways for world development within planetary boundaries,” nature, vol. 641, no. 8064, pp. 910–916, 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-08928-w.

N. Lestari, A. Sulaiman, and V. R. Multiwijaya, “Implementation of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) in Indonesia related to protected wildlife trade cases,” Injuruty: Interdisciplinary Journal and Humanity, vol. 4, no. 11, 2025.

O. A. Victoria, A. R. Ariyana, and D. Arifani, “The legal protection of biodiversity and the environment in Indonesia,” KnE Social Sciences, vol. 10, no. 26, pp. 126–140, 2025, doi: 10.18502/kss.v10i26.19985.

L. Yustitianingtyas et al., “Environmental law policy in Indonesia: Challenges and sustainable justice,” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 1473, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1473/1/012046.

K. G. Austin, A. Schwantes, Y. Gu, and P. S. Kasibhatla, “What causes deforestation in Indonesia?,” Environmental Research Letters, vol. 14, no. 2, Art. no. 024007, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aaf6db.

B. A. Margono, P. V. Potapov, S. Turubanova, F. Stolle, and M. C. Hansen, “Primary forest cover loss in Indonesia over 2000–2012,” Nature Climate Change, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 730–735, 2014, doi: 10.1038/nclimate2277.

Z. J. Fernando, S. Dahwal, F. Arifin, M. A. Maskur, and A. A. Muthia, “Advancing ecological justice through the integration of eco-religion in criminal law reform,” Journal of Law, Environmental and Justice, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 160–200, 2025, doi: 10.62264/jlej.v3i2.133.

I. Fhadilah, L. Asyafira, and A. U. Hosnah, “Restorative justice and environmental crime: Exploring new models for addressing harm to the environment and communities,” Enigma in Law, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 157–170, 2025, doi: 10.61996/law.v3i1.84.

A. R. Green, “A critical environmental justice framework for the illegal wildlife trade,” Frontiers in Conservation Science, vol. 6, 2025, doi: 10.3389/fcosc.2025.1535093.

J. R. de Oliveira, T. V. R. de Vasconcelos, and G. de Souza, “Extinction and responsibility: Toward an ethics framework for animal rights to life,” Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, vol. 25, pp. 39–49, 2025, doi: 10.3354/esep00219.

Himanshu, P. Agrawal, and A. K. Singh, “Ethics of sustainability: Moral responsibility for the future,” International Journal of Research & Technology, vol. 14, Suppl. 1, pp. 636–643, 2026, doi: 10.64882/ijrt.v14.iS1.1072.

M. Hourdequin, “Intergenerational ethics and climate change,” WIREs Climate Change, vol. 16, no. 1, Art. no. e934, 2025, doi: 10.1002/wcc.934.

C. Rehmann-Sutter, “Janna Thompson’s argument for climate obligations,” International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 169–193, 2025, doi: 10.3138/ijfab-2025-0007.

D. Scheer et al., “No easy way out: Towards a framework concept of long-term governance,” Energy, Sustainability and Society, vol. 15, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.1186/s13705-025-00513-3.

A. Naess, “The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement: A summary,” Inquiry, vol. 16, nos. 1–4, pp. 95–100, 1973, doi: 10.1080/00201747308601682.

R. Eckersley, Environmentalism and Political Theory: Toward an Ecocentric Approach. London, U.K.: Routledge, 2023, doi: 10.4324/9781315072111.

B. Latour, Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. C. Porter, Ed. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press, 2004.

S. Banwell, V. Nelson, and F. Dehbi, “Achieving sustainability transformations for multi-species justice: Assessing the potential of diverse legal pathways and societal struggles,” Sustainability Science, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1017–1035, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s11625-025-01627-5.

D. Celermajer et al., Institutionalising Multispecies Justice. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2025, doi: 10.1017/9781009506243.

A. J. Shetty and M. Saxena, “Harm principle in green criminology: Environmental harm and human risk matrix,” Frontiers in Climate, vol. 7, 2025, doi: 10.3389/fclim.2025.1602227.

M. Tian, G. R. Potter, and J. Phelps, “Conservation criminalisation and China’s evolving wildlife sanctions,” Biological Conservation, vol. 308, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111238.

Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), 2019 Activity Report of the CITES Secretariat. Geneva, Switzerland: CITES Secretariat, 2019.

R. A. Sollund, The Crimes of Wildlife Trafficking: Issues of Justice, Legality and Morality. London, U.K.: Routledge, 2019, doi: 10.4324/9781315550428.

M. Bowman, P. Davies, and C. Redgwell, Lyster’s International Wildlife Law. 2nd ed. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2010.

B. N. Arief, Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta, Indonesia: Kencana, 2016.

H. Marcos, “Tech won’t save us: Climate crisis, techno-optimism, and international law,” Law, Technology and Humans, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 22–46, 2025, doi: 10.5204/lthj.3816.

M. J. Lynch and P. B. Stretesky, Exploring Green Criminology: Toward a Green Criminological Revolution. London, U.K.: Routledge, 2014, doi: 10.4324/9781315581644.

D. R. Boyd, The Rights of Nature: A Legal Revolution That Could Save the World. Toronto, ON, Canada: ECW Press, 2017.

L. J. Kotzé, “Earth system law for the Anthropocene,” Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 23, Art. no. 6796, 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11236796.

L. J. Kotzé and P. Villavicencio Calzadilla, “Somewhere between rhetoric and reality: Environmental constitutionalism and the rights of nature in Ecuador,” Transnational Environmental Law, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 401–433, 2017, doi: 10.1017/S2047102517000061.

S. E. Adiyatma, A. Silviana, and D. A. Thanni, “Criminalising the guardians: Eco-justice and indigenous struggles in Indonesia and Nigeria,” IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies), vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 901–951, 2025, doi: 10.15294/ijcls.v10i2.33536.

P. Silalahi, “Substantive justice in enforcing environmental and plantation criminal law in Indonesia,” KnE Social Sciences, vol. 10, no. 26, pp. 560–570, 2025, doi: 10.18502/kss.v10i26.20034.

F. Tarigan, Hartiwiningsih, M. Rustamaji, I. B. N. Annisa, and M. M. Gunawan, “The rights of victims of environmental crimes in Indonesia: Challenges for legal reform,” Journal of Law, Environmental and Justice, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 342–382, 2025, doi: 10.62264/jlej.v3i1.130.

S. J. E. Bétaille, “From doctrine to data: Towards an empirical turn in European legal scholarship,” European Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, vol. 2, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.62355/ejels.25120.

S. Theil, “Carefully tailored: Doctrinal methods and empirical contributions,” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 1047–1075, 2025, doi: 10.1093/ojls/gqaf029.

R. Firmansyah, M. Widjaja, C. E. Kusumawardani, F. Sugianto, and A. A. Indradewi, “Justice collaborator at a legal crossroads: An analysis of the tension between substantive justice and legal certainty,” SIGn Jurnal Hukum, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 368–384, 2025, doi: 10.37276/sjh.v7i1.479.

M. Irwan, A. Rahman, and A. Amaliyah, “Judicial law-finding in the criminal justice system: Harmonising legal certainty and substantive justice,” SIGn Jurnal Hukum, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 647–663, 2025, doi: 10.37276/sjh.v7i2.502.

T. Y. Pratama, H. Suryokumoro, and A. E. Widiarto, “Analysing the concept of incompleteness and ambiguity of norms in formal testing of laws at the constitutional court,” International Review of Social Sciences Research, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 106–127, 2025, doi: 10.53378/irssr.353148.

R. Atadjanov, “Interpretation of law,” in A Common Theory of Law: Textbook on New Legal Approaches for Post-Soviet States, R. Atadjanov, Ed. The Hague, The Netherlands: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2026, pp. 147–153, doi: 10.1007/978-94-6265-711-3_11.

D. Simanungkalit and V. Vanny, “Misreading the court decision: Reflecting on constitutional interpretation in Nusantara Capital law formation,” Jurnal Ius Constituendum, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 432–452, 2025, doi: 10.26623/jic.v10i3.12531.

M. Faure and S. Lopik, “Methods for environmental criminal law research,” in A Research Agenda for Environmental Crime and the Law, R. Pereira and T. Fajardo, Eds. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2025, pp. 27–42, doi: 10.4337/9781803929958.00008.

H. Rhiti, “The environment as a legal subject: A post-humanist philosophical perspective,” International Journal of Science, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 108–114, 2025, doi: 10.51601/ijse.v5i4.243.

C. J. Anderson, S. D. Jewell, J. E. Kolby, M. P. Jones, C. Firth, and J. K. Reaser, “The US Lacey Act is a One Health policy framework 125 years in the making,” BioScience, 2025, doi: 10.1093/biosci/biaf077.

V. Plumwood, Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. London, U.K.: Routledge, 1993.

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), World Wildlife Crime Report: Trafficking in Protected Species. Vienna, Austria: United Nations, 2016.

M. Pelengkahu, “Green criminology: Evolution, typology, and legal framework for environmental protection,” Ius Poenale, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 37–54, 2025, doi: 10.25041/ip.v6i1.4444.

R. S. Shahrullah, W. Ong’eta, N. Nurlaily, T. Santoso, H. M. Zin, and M. R. Ramadhani, “Unveiling the illicit trade: Legal perspectives on lobster seed smuggling in Batam City,” Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 589–632, 2025, doi: 10.15294/jils.v10i1.1577.

K. Pakpahan, S. Sulistyawati, W. Tanjaya, and S. P. Berutu, “Wildlife poaching: An environmental law analysis of transnational organised crime networks,” Nusantara: Journal of Law Studies, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 171–186, 2025, doi: 10.66325/nusantaralaw.v5i1.36.

B. Wiyono, “Legal protection of endangered wildlife in Indonesia: Analysis of Verdict No. 185/Pid.B/LH/2020/PN.Bon under the conservation law,” Pena Justicia, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 7879–7895, 2025, doi: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.6348.

A. M. Yanis, R. R. A. Rahman, and R. Malida, “Public participation in legal enforcement of wildlife protection in Indonesia,” KnE Social Sciences, vol. 10, no. 14, pp. 507–516, 2025, doi: 10.18502/kss.v10i14.19113.

E. B. Weiss, In Fairness to Future Generations: International Law, Common Patrimony, and Intergenerational Equity. Tokyo, Japan: United Nations Universi

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2026-07-13

How to Cite

[1]
B. K. Limantara, “Criminal Law Reform for Wildlife Protection Based on Ecological Justice: A Normative Legal Approach in Indonesia”, J.Math.Instr.Soc.Res.Opin., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 2079–2088, Jul. 2026.

Issue

Section

Articles