From Students’ Ways of Thinking to Meaning Construction: Hermeneutics Perspective of the ε-δ Definition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58421/misro.v5i3.1537Keywords:
Ways of thinking, Hermeneutics perspective, Differential calculus, Real analysis, Definition of ε-δAbstract
The definition is widely recognized as one of the most conceptually demanding topics in differential calculus and introductory real analysis, as students often rely on intuitive notions of closeness without fully grasping its formal logical structure. Building on prior findings on students’ ways of thinking, this study investigates how such ways of thinking contribute to the construction of mathematical meaning related to the definition. This study employed a qualitative hermeneutic design involving written responses, task-based interviews, and reflective memos from 28 undergraduate students enrolled in calculus and introductory real analysis courses. Data were analyzed through a hermeneutic cycle consisting of naïve reading, selective highlighting, thematic interpretation, and the integration of students’ interpretations with the formal mathematical meaning of the definition. The findings reveal three dominant interpretive themes: distance meaning, where and are understood as measures of closeness; responsive dependency, where δ is interpreted as a response to a chosen ; and control meaning, where functions as a mechanism for regulating input proximity. Persistent challenges include equality, dependency and confusion in quantifier sequencing. This study contributes by extending students’ ways of thinking into a hermeneutic account of meaning construction, providing an epistemic basis for future didactic transposition studies. The findings also suggest instructional approaches that explicitly address distance, dependency, and logical sequencing in teaching the definition.
Downloads
References
A, Howard., & Herr, Calculus with analytic geometry. New York: Wiley, 1998.
Bartle, R. G., & Sherbert, D. R, Introduction to real analysis (Vol. 2). New York: Wiley, 2000.
Boero, P, Analyzing the transition to epsilon-delta Calculus: A case study. In CERME 9-Ninth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, pp. 93-99, 2015.
Adiredja, A. P, The pancake story and the epsilon–delta definition. Primus, 31(6), 662-677, 2021.
Caglayan, G, Math majors' visual proofs in a dynamic environment: The case of limit of a function and the ϵ–δ approach. International journal of mathematical education in science and technology, 46(6), 797-823, 2015.
Cornu, B, Limits. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 153–166). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991.
Kim, D. J., & Lim, W. The relative interdependency of colloquial and mathematical discourses regarding the notion and calculations of limit: An evidence-based cross-cultural study. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(8), 1561-1579, 2018.
Kim, D., Kang, H., & Lee, H. Two different epistemologies about limit concepts. International Education Studies, 8(3), 138–145, 2015.
Rasmussen, C., Marrongelle, K., & Borba, M, Research on calculus: What do we know and where do we need to go? ZDM Mathematics Education, 46(4), 507–515, 2014.
Rasmussen, C., Marrongelle, K., & Borba, M, Research trends in undergraduate mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 5, 2021.
Weber, K, Students’ difficulties with proof and quantifiers. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 43, 50–64, 2016.
Williams, S. R, Models of limit held by college calculus students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(3), 219–236, 1991.
Roh, K. H. An empirical study of students’ understanding of a logical structure in the definition of limit via the ε-strip activity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 73(3), 263-279, 2010.
Prihandhika, A., & Ramadani, I, Interpreting the ε–δ Definition: Hermeneutic Insights into Students’ Ways of Thinking. Riemann: Research of Mathematics and Mathematics Education, 8(1), 341-358, 2026.
Prihandhika, A., & Sopiany, H. N, Procedural Dominance in Students’ Reasoning on the Limit Definition: Insights from a Ways of Thinking Framework. Journal of Mathematics Instruction, Social Research and Opinion, 4(4), 1313-1324, 2025.
Kidron, I., & Tall, D. The role of embodiment and symbolism in the potential and actual infinity of the limit process. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 2015.
Gucler, B. The role of symbols in mathematical communication: The case of the limit notation. Research in Mathematics Education, 16(3), 251–268, 2014, https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 14794 802
Gucler, B. Examining the discourse on the limit concept in a beginning-level calculus classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(3), 439–453. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10649- 012- 9438-2, 2013.
Fernández, E, The students’ take on the ε–δ definition of a limit. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23(2), 215–236, 2004.
Fernández-Plaza, J. A., & Simpson, A. Three concepts or one? Students’ understanding of basic limit concepts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 93(3), 315-332, 2016.
Sierpinska, A, Understanding in mathematics. London: Falmer Press, 1994.
Roh, K. H, An empirical study of students’ understanding of a logical structure in the definition of limit. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 29(2), 97–115, 2010.
Hitt, F., & Dufour, S. Introduction to calculus through an open-ended task in the context of speed: representations and actions by students in action. ZDM–Mathematics education, 53(3), 635-647, 2021.
Tall, D, How humans learn to think mathematically: Exploring the three worlds of mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
Tall, D., & Vinner, S, Concept image and concept definition in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12(2), 151–169, 1981.
Prihandhika, A., & Perbowo, K. S, The review of concept image and concept definition: A hermeneutic phenomenological study on the derivative concepts. International Journal of Didactic Mathematics in Distance Education, 1(1), 13-23, 2024.
Brown, T, Mathematics education and language: Interpreting hermeneutics and post-structuralism. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2002.
Carl, M, Understanding mathematical texts: a hermeneutical approach. Synthese, 200(6), 524, 2022.
Creswell, J. W, Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2013.
Ellis, A. B., Ozgur, Z., & Kulow, T, Quantitative reasoning in mathematics learning: Leveling the playing field. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 47(2), 131–164, 2016.
Jahnke, H. N, History in mathematics education. A hermeneutic approach. In Mathematics & mathematics education: Searching for common ground (75-88). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2014.
Markle, J, Enactive hermeneutics as an interpretive framework in the mathematics classroom. Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal, 37, 1-27, 2021.
Ricoeur, P, History and hermeneutics. In Philosophy of History and Action: Papers Presented at the First Jerusalem Philosophical Encounter December 1974 (3-20). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1978.
Skinner, Q, Hermeneutics and the Role of History. New Literary History, 7(1), 209-232. 2(1), 1–12, 1975.
Gadamer, H.-G, Truth and method (2nd rev. ed., J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans.). London: Continuum, 2004.
Mahadewsing, R., Getrouw, D., & Calor, S. M. Prior knowledge of a calculus course: The impact of prior knowledge on students’ errors. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 19(3), em0786, 2024.
Carpenter, T. P. Conceptual knowledge as a foundation for procedural knowledge. In Conceptual and procedural knowledge, Routledge, (pp. 113-132), 2013.
Ricoeur, P, Interpretation theory: Discourse and the surplus of meaning. Fort Worth, TX: Texas Christian University Press, 1976.
Lesh, R., & Harel, G. Problem solving, modeling, and local conceptual development. Mathematical thinking and learning, 5(2-3), 157-189, 2003.
Braithwaite, D. W., & Sprague, L. Conceptual knowledge, procedural knowledge, and metacognition in routine and nonroutine problem solving. Cognitive Science, 45(10), e13048, 2021.
Debesay, J., Nåden, D., & Slettebø, Å. How do we close the hermeneutic circle? A Gadamerian approach to justification in interpretation in qualitative studies. Nursing inquiry, 15(1), 57-66, 2008.
Hintikka, J. Gadamer: squaring the hermeneutical circle. Revue internationale de philosophie, 54(213 (3), 487-497, 2000.
Sierpinska, A. Humanities students and epistemological obstacles related to limits. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 18, 371–397, 1987.
Dubinsky, E., & McDonald, M. A. APOS: A constructivist theory of learning in undergraduate mathematics education research. In The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level: An ICMI study, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 275-282, 2001.
Harel, G., Selden, A., & Selden, J. Advanced mathematical thinking: Some PME perspectives. In Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education, Brill, 147-172, 2006.
Chevallard, Y., & Bosch, M. Didactic transposition in mathematics education. In Encyclopedia of mathematics education, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 214-218, 2020.
González-Martín, A. S. Using Tools from ATD to Analyse the Use of Mathematics in Engineering Tasks: Some Cases Involving Integrals. In Advances in the Anthropological Theory of the Didactic, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 307-315, 2022.
Topphol, V. The didactic transposition of the fundamental theorem of calculus. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 12(2), 144-172, 2023.
Biehler, R. Reconstruction of meaning as a didactical task: The concept of function as an example. In meaning in mathematics education, New York, NY: Springer US, 61-81, 2005.
Gruschka, A. How we can and why we have to reconstruct teaching. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 7(2), 85-97, 2018.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Mathematics Instruction, Social Research and Opinion

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

















