From Learning Obstacles to Conceptual Understanding: Developing GeoGebra-Assisted Teaching Materials for Elementary Fractions through Educational Design Research

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/misro.v5i3.1502

Authors

Keywords:

assisted teaching, GeoGebra, Teaching and Learning Materials (TLMs), Fractions

Abstract

Learning fractions remains a significant challenge in elementary education, often hindered by specific learning obstacles. This study aims to develop GeoGebra-assisted teaching materials integrated with a Hypothetical Learning Trajectory (HLT) to bridge the gap between these obstacles and conceptual understanding. Adopting an Educational Design Research (EDR) approach, the study progressed through three iterative phases: analysis and exploration, design and construction, and evaluation and reflection. The development was grounded in an initial pedagogical analysis of student learning obstacles, which informed the HLT design. Data were collected through expert validation, teacher interviews, and field testing with 161 elementary students (divided into small-scale and large-scale trials), then analyzed qualitatively using retrospective analysis and constant comparative methods.The quantitative results indicate that the GeoGebra-based materials are highly valid (92.75% from media experts) and practical (81.75% in large-scale trials), effectively transforming the HLT into a verified learning path. However, qualitative findings revealed a critical nuance: while students engaged enthusiastically with dynamic visualizations, some faced challenges in transitioning from visual area models to formal symbolic notation. This underscores the necessity of teacher-led instrumental orchestration to scaffold mathematical generalizations. This research concludes that the synergy between dynamic geometry software and a structured learning trajectory provides a robust framework for overcoming cognitive barriers, provided it is integrated within a dialogic instructional environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Kunter, M. (2013). Professional Competence of Teachers: Effects on Instructional Quality and Student Development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 805 - 820. doi:10.1037/a0032583

Kuldarkhan, O. (2016). Professional Competence of Teachers in the Age of Globalization. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 11(9), 2659 - 2672. doi:10.12973/ijese.2016.714a

Delaney, S., & Phelps, G. C. (2005, June). Conceptualizing Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching. Retrieved from www.personal.umich.edu/dball

Browning, C., Thanheiser, E., & al. (2014). Prospective Elementary Mathematics Teacher Content Knowledge: An Introduction. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 11(2), 203 - 216.

Hoover, M., Mosvold, R., Ball, D. L., & Lai, Y. (2016). Making Progress in Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 13(1), 3 - 34. Retrieved from http://scholarworks.umt.edu/tme/co1l3/issl/3

Fitriani, Darhim, Prabawanto. (2021). The Mathematical Content Knowledge of Elementary School Pre-Service Teachers. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Educational Sciences (ICES 2019). 311- 316

Kilpatrick, J. S. (2001). Adding It Up: Helping Children Learn Mathematics. Washington: National Academy Press.

Getenet, S. (2017). Teaching Fractions for Understanding: Addressing Interrelated Concepts. In S. L. A. Downton, 40 years on We are still learning! Proceedings of the 40th Annual of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 277-284). Melbourne: MERGA.

Gupta, D. (2015). Teaching and Learning of Fractions in Elementary Grades: Let the dialogue begin. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 17(1), 27-44.

Fitriani, Darhim, Juandi (2023). Effect of Mathematical Content Knowledge on Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching. Journal for Educators, Teachers, and Trainers, Vol. 14(5). 299-308

Olanoff, D. L. (2014). Mathematical Content Knowledge for Teaching Elementary Mathematics: A Focus on Fractions. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 11(2), 267-310. doi:https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1304

Depaepe, F. e. (2015). Teachers' Content and Pedagogical Content Knowledge on Rational Numbers: A Comparison of Prospective Elementary and Lower Secondary School Teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 47, 82-92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.12.009

Purnomo, Y. W., Pasri, Aziz, T. A., Shahrill, M., & Prananto, I. W. (2022). Students’ failure to understand fraction multiplication as part of a quantity. Journal on Mathematics Education, 13(4), 681–702. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v13i4.pp681-702

Brosseau, G. (2002). Theory of Didactical Situations in Mathematics: Didactique des Mathematiques. (N. C. Balacheff, Trans.) Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2018). Conducting Educational Design Research. London: Routledge.

Simon, M. A. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 26 (2), 114 – 145

Gravemeijer. (2004). Local Instruction Theories as Means of Support for Teachers in Reform Mathematics education. Mathematics Thinking and learning. 6(2), 105 – 128

Gravemeijer, K. & Cobb, P. (2006). Design research from the learning design perpective. In J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.) Educational Design research (pp. 45-85). London: Routledge.

Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 2, 8-14

Nabila, H. I., Fitriani, N., & Setiawan, W. (2023). Pengembangan media pembelajaran vidio animaker pada materi statistika. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, 6(3), 1071–1082. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v6i3.17563

Fitriani, Darhim, Juandi. (2024). Examining Pre-service Teacher Belief in Technological for Teaching Mathematics. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar. 11 (1). 36-56

Guerriro, S. (2017). Teachers’ Pedagogical Knowledge and the Teaching Profession. Retrieved from OECD Library: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/9789264270695-en/index.html?itemId=/content/component/9789264270695-6-en

Drijvers, P. (2012). Digital Technology in Mathematics Education: Why it Works (or doesn’t). 12th International Congress on Mathematics Education, (pp. 485-501). Seoul.

Tzur, S. K. (2021). Learning Supported by Technology: Effectiveness with educational software. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(3), 1137-1156. doi:https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.3.1139

Malahayati, E.N., Zunaidah, F.N., 2021. Analisis Kebutuhan Bahan Ajar Mata Kuliah Kurikulum. J. Basicedu 5, 6218–6226.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2026-09-02

How to Cite

[1]
A. D. Fitriani, L. C. Br Ginting, and H. W. Prabawa, “From Learning Obstacles to Conceptual Understanding: Developing GeoGebra-Assisted Teaching Materials for Elementary Fractions through Educational Design Research”, J.Math.Instr.Soc.Res.Opin., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 2243–2256, Sep. 2026.

Issue

Section

Articles