Self-Concept as a Determinant of Ethical Behavior in Organizational Professional Practice

Intan Ratna Sari Yanti

doi:10.58421/misro.v5i1.1259

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/misro.v5i1.1259

Authors

Intan Ratna Sari Yanti Institut Teknologi PLN

Keywords:

Ethical Behavior, Ethical Leadership, Organizational Culture, Professional Ethics, Self-Concept

Abstract

The development of modern organizations requires individuals not only to possess professional competence but also to demonstrate ethical behavior in carrying out their professional responsibilities. However, many organizations still face challenges related to inconsistent ethical behavior among professionals, indicating a gap between ethical standards and actual practice; therefore, this study aims to examine the role of self-concept as a determinant of ethical behavior in professional settings. Ethical behavior in organizations is influenced not only by external regulations such as professional codes of conduct but also by internal psychological factors within individuals. One of the most important internal factors is self-concept, which reflects how individuals perceive and understand themselves in relation to their roles and responsibilities in the workplace. This research employs a qualitative approach, using in-depth interviews and documentation to obtain comprehensive insights into individual perceptions and experiences of ethical behavior in professional settings. Purposive sampling is used, and the data are analyzed through thematic analysis. The results indicate that individuals with a clear and positive self-concept tend to demonstrate stronger moral awareness, greater responsibility, and more consistent ethical decision-making, with key themes including self-awareness, moral responsibility, ethical consistency, and organizational support. Furthermore, organizational culture and ethical leadership reinforce the development of self-concept that supports ethical behavior. This study provides empirical insight into the psychological basis of ethical behavior and offers practical implications for strengthening organizational integrity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Z. Rahimi-Nezhad and M. Beheshtifar, “Role of Self-Concept in Organizations,” European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, no. 44, pp. 159–164, 2012.

J. Schaubroeck, Y. J. Kim, and A. C. Peng, “The self-concept in organizational psychology: Clarifying and differentiating the constructs,” in International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2012, G. P. Hodgkinson and J. K. Ford, Eds. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012, pp. 1–38.

M. Özcan, H. G. Çekmecelioğlu, and G. Konakay, “Reflections of self-concept clarity at work: The mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relationship between self-concept clarity and intrinsic motivation,” BMC Psychology, vol. 13, no. 1, Art. no. 470, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02800-2

H. Zhang et al., “The Authentic Moral Self: Dynamic Interplay between Perceived Authenticity and Moral Behaviors in the Workplace,” Collabra: Psychology, vol. 5, no. 1, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.260

M.-C. Afota, V. Robert, and C. Vandenberghe, “Workaholism, work engagement, and affective commitment: Relationships to self-concept levels and work outcomes,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 15, Art. no. 1434482, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1434482

P. Radigan, B. Gilbreath, X. Wang, and W. Scroggins, “Perceived leader concern, employee authentic self-expression, and self-concept–job fit,” Journal of Management & Organization, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 2385–2403, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2025.10035

X. Liu, Y. Huang, J. Kim and S. Na, “How ethical leadership cultivates innovative work behaviors in employees? Psychological safety, work engagement and openness to experience,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 4, p. 3452, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043452

C. Moore, D. M. Mayer, F. F. T. Chiang, C. Crossley, M. J. Karlesky, and T. A. Birtch, “Leaders matter morally: The role of ethical leadership in shaping employee moral cognition and misconduct,” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 123–145, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000341

A. S. Aryati and Armanu, “The influence of self-efficacy on organizational commitment and ethical behavior: The role of job satisfaction,” Journal of Theoretical and Applied Management, vol. 16, no. 2, 2023.

F. Guo, Z. Xue, J. He, and F. Yasmin, “Ethical leadership and workplace behavior in the education sector: The implications of employees' ethical work behavior,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 13, Art. no. 1040000, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1040000

M. D. Myers, “Qualitative research in business and management,” SAGE Publications, 2013.

J. W. Creswell and C. N. Poth, “Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches,” SAGE Publications, 2018.

A. Bryman, “Social research methods,” Oxford University Press, 2016.

V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

J. Saldaña, “The coding manual for qualitative researchers,” SAGE Publications, 2016.

P. Uğurlar and D. U. Wulff, “Self-concept clarity is associated with social decision making performance,” Personality and Individual Differences, vol. 197, 2022, Art. no. 111783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111783

H. Al Halbusi, P. Ruiz-Palomino, P. Jimenez-Estevez, and S. Gutiérrez-Broncano, “How upper/middle managers' ethical leadership activates employee ethical behavior? The role of organizational justice perceptions among employees,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 12, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.652471

Y. Sun, X. Wang, S. Su, W.-F. Chen, and T. Jiang, “Low self-concept clarity induces scarcity perceptions: The subsequent effects on prosocial behavior,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2024.

M. Ahmed and M. I. Khan, “Unpacking the paradoxical impact of ethical leadership on employees’ prosocial rule-breaking behavior,” PLOS ONE, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306912

M. Ahmed and M. I. Khan, “Unlocking the paradoxical impact of ethical leadership on employees’ prosocial rule-breaking behavior,” International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-12-2023-0286

S. Serang, R. Ramlawati, S. Suriyanti, J. Junaidi, and R. A. Nurimansjah, “The role of ethical leadership on employees’ behaviors and commitment to the organization,” SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 2024.

S. Oh and S. Roh, “A moderated mediation model of self-concept clarity, transformational leadership, perceived work meaningfulness, and work motivation,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 10, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01756

F. Njaramba and J. Olukuru, “Surviving a crisis: A multilevel model of leadership styles, employees’ psychological capital and organizational resilience,” PLOS ONE, vol. 20, no. 2, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0318515

A. Saleem et al., “Leader's ethical behavior: A precursor to employees' well-being through emotions management,” Acta Psychologica, vol. 249, 2024, Art. no. 104453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104453

A. N. Abuzaid, M. Y. Ghadi, S.-a. M. Madadha and M. M. Alateeq, “The effect of ethical leadership on innovative work behaviors,” Administrative Sciences, vol. 14, no. 9, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/a