Reconceptualising The Geometry Gap: Theoretical Insights From Van Hiele And Constructivist Perspectives On Triangle Theorem Instruction In South Africa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/misro.v5i3.1193

Authors

Keywords:

Geometry, triangles, troubles, theorems

Abstract

Geometry forms a fundamental component of secondary school mathematics because it supports the development of spatial reasoning, logical thinking, and deductive proof skills. However, persistent learner difficulties in understanding geometric concepts, particularly triangle theorems, remain a significant concern in many education systems. This conceptual paper examines the factors contributing to the geometry gap in South African schools, with a particular focus on the teaching and learning of triangles and their associated theorems. The paper adopts a conceptual research approach that synthesises recent literature and theoretical perspectives in mathematics education, including the van Hiele theory of geometric thinking, constructivist learning theory and socio-cultural perspectives on learning. Through an integrative analysis of recent scholarship, the paper identifies structural, pedagogical and cognitive factors that collectively influence learners’ geometry learning outcomes. The study further proposes a conceptual framework explaining how these dimensions interact to produce persistent gaps in learners’ geometric reasoning and problem-solving abilities. The interconnected nature of these challenges offers theoretically grounded insights that may inform curriculum development, teacher professional development and instructional innovation aimed at improving geometry education. The findings contribute to ongoing debates on mathematics education equity and provide a foundation for future empirical research on strategies for strengthening geometry instruction in South African schools.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

N. Spaull and J. Taylor, “Effective schooling in South Africa: The role of teachers, curriculum and assessment,” South African Journal of Education, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 1–12, 2021.

A. Ajani, “Addressing inequality in STEM education in South African schools,” Education Sciences, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 1–15, 2023.

K. Graham and M. Bansilal, “Conceptual understanding in mathematics education,” International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, vol. 53, no. 7, pp. 1785–1801, 2022.

S. Maqoqa, “Mathematics curriculum reform and learner performance in South Africa,” Journal of Education Studies, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 45–60, 2024.

E. Machisi and N. Feza, “Van Hiele theory-based instruction and geometric proof competencies,” Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2021.

M. Battista, “Cognitive challenges in learning Euclidean geometry,” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 421–438, 2021.

OECD, PISA 2022 Results: Mathematics Performance and Equity, Paris: OECD Publishing, 2023.

H. K. Lee and S. Hollebrands, “Dynamic geometry environments in mathematics learning,” Educational Studies in Mathematics, vol. 111, no. 3, pp. 489–507, 2022.

S. Mphuthi, “Educational inequalities and mathematics achievement in South Africa,” Perspectives in Education, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 112–128, 2024.

M. Fleisch, The Education Triple Cocktail: Systemic Inequality in South African Schools. Cape Town: UCT Press, 2022.

Department of Basic Education, National Senior Certificate Examination Report, Pretoria: DBE, 2023.

S. A. Tachie, “Challenges faced by teachers in teaching Euclidean geometry,” International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 271–286, 2021.

T. Shabangu and B. Mofolo-Mbokane, “Learners’ performance in geometric reasoning tasks,” in Proc. ICERI Conf., 2024.

J. Venkat and M. Adler, “Inequality and mathematics learning in South African classrooms,” Educational Studies in Mathematics, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2022.

P. Usiskin, “Van Hiele levels and achievement in secondary school geometry,” Journal of Mathematical Behavior, vol. 65, pp. 1–12, 2022.

B. Sidelil et al., “Teachers’ understanding of geometry concepts and Van Hiele’s theory,” Journal of Science and Inclusive Development, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 70–84, 2024.

R. Armah, “Geometric thinking of prospective mathematics teachers,” Teacher Education and Curriculum Studies, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 40–51, 2024.

H. Fujita and K. Jones, “Learners’ reasoning in geometry and proof,” Mathematics Education Research Journal, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 233–252, 2023.

S. Hollebrands, “Technology and geometry reasoning,” Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 225–242, 2022.

M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen and P. Drijvers, “Realistic mathematics education and conceptual learning,” Educational Studies in Mathematics, vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 201–217, 2022.

R. Bansilal, “Teacher knowledge and mathematics instruction,” African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 150–162, 2022.

J. Adler and Y. Setati, “Language and mathematics learning in multilingual classrooms,” Mathematics Education Research Journal, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 423–440, 2022.

A. Clark-Wilson, O. Robutti, and N. Sinclair, “Digital technologies in mathematics education,” ZDM Mathematics Education, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 1223–1235, 2021.

S. Venkat and J. Graven, “Improving mathematics teaching in contexts of inequality,” South African Journal of Childhood Education, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2022.

M. Bansilal and N. Naidoo, “Teacher professional development and geometry teaching,” African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 44–55, 2023.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2026-07-10

How to Cite

[1]
S. Chiphambo, “Reconceptualising The Geometry Gap: Theoretical Insights From Van Hiele And Constructivist Perspectives On Triangle Theorem Instruction In South Africa”, J.Math.Instr.Soc.Res.Opin., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 2035–2048, Jul. 2026.

Issue

Section

Articles