Application Ability of Students in Integrated Computer-Aided Numerical Analysis Learning

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/misro.v1i1.11

Authors

  • Kosim Kosim Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Komputer Poltek Cirebon

Keywords:

Application Ability, Integrated Learning, Numerical Analysis Courses

Abstract

The low ability of students to apply in numerical analysis courses is a problem in this research. Integrated learning is one solution to this problem. The aim is to determine the differences in student application abilities between integrated and conventional learning. One of the computer science colleges in the Cirebon area was sampled in this study. Two groups were formed, consisting of 1 integrated study group with a total of 36 students and one conventional study group with a total of 32 students. Both groups contracted numerical analysis courses. What carried out the type of quasi-experimental research and the static group comparison randomized control group only design became the design in this study. The result is that the average value of the application ability of students who study conventionally is 80.31, while the average application ability of students who study in an integrated manner is 84.58. The application ability of students who study integrated is higher than students who study conventionally, and the ability to apply of students who study integrated is more uniform than students who study conventionally. The results of the Mann-Whitney test found that the application ability of students who studied in an integrated manner was better than those who studied conventionally.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Y. W. Lin, C. L. Tseng, and P. J. Chiang, “The effect of blended learning in mathematics course,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 741–770, 2017, doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2017.00641a.

A. Qohar, “Mathematical Communication: What and How to Develop It In Mathematics Learning?,” Int. Semin. Fourth Natl. Conf. Math. Educ., pp. 1–12, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/11058861.pdf.

K. Das, “Role of ICT for better Mathematics Teaching,” Shanlax Int. J. Educ., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 19–28, 2019, doi: 10.34293/education.v7i4.641.

D. P. Sari, R. A. Sukmawati, and I. Zulkarnain, “The Relationship Between Mathematical Ability and Programming Ability of Computer Science Education Students,” in 1st International Conference on Creativity, Innovation, Technology in Education (IC-CITE 2018), 2018, no. February 2020, doi: 10.2991/iccite-18.2018.12.

M. Saiful Bakhril Amin and N. Rachmani Dewi, “Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research Connected Mathematics Ability Seen from Student Cognitive Style on STAD-Peer Tutoring Learning Model,” UJMER, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 93–99, 2020, [Online]. Available: http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujmer.

R. M. Bottino, P. Forcheri, F. Furinghetti, and M. T. Molfino, “An attempt to integrate mathematics and computer science in high school,” in Proceedings of the 38th CIEAEM’s meeting, 1987, no. July 1986, pp. 115–120.

D. D. Agyei and J. Voogt, “ICT use in the teaching of mathematics: Implications for professional development of pre-service teachers in Ghana,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 423–439, 2011, doi: 10.1007/s10639-010-9141-9.

M. Y. Mazana, C. S. Montero, and R. O. Casmir, “Investigating Students’ Attitude towards Learning Mathematics,” Int. Electron. J. Math. Educ., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 207–231, 2018, doi: 10.29333/iejme/3997.

J. A. Ejiwale, “Barriers To Successful Implementation of STEM Education,” J. Educ. Learn., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 63–74, 2013, doi: 10.11591/edulearn.v7i2.220.

M. Muilu et al., “What Are the Barriers for Teaching Computational Thinking?,” INTED2021 Proc., vol. 1, no. May, pp. 5895–5901, 2021, doi: 10.21125/inted.2021.1184.

J. Mason, “Mathematical Abstraction as the Result of a Delicate Shift of Attention,” Learn. Math., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 2–8, 1989, [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40247947%5Cnhttp://www.jstor.org.proxy-um.researchport.umd.edu/stable/pdfplus/40247947.pdf?acceptTC=true.

H. Hendriana and N. Fitriani, “Mathematical Abstraction of Year 9 Students Using Realistic Mathematics Education Based on the Van Hiele Levels of Geometry,” J. Didakt. Mat., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2019, doi: 10.24815/jdm.v6i1.13285.

W. Widada, A. Agustina, S. Serlis, B. M. Dinata, and S. T. Hasari, “The abstraction ability of students in understanding the concept of geometry,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1318, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1318/1/012082.

V. F. Falentina, A. Muchyidin, and T. S. Nasehudin, “Van Hiele ’ s Theory and Think Pair Share Cooperative Learning Model and Their Effect on Madrasah Tsanawiyah Student ’ s Level of Mathematical Thinking,” J. Gen. Educ. Humanit., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2022.

A. T. Rahayu, A. Muchyidin, and B. Manfaat, “The Application of The Guided Note-Taking ( GNT ) Learning Method and its Effect on Student ’ s Understanding of Mathematics Concepts,” J. Gen. Educ. Humanit., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 12–20, 2022.

I. S. Aminah, A. Muchyidin, and R. O. Akbar, “ARIAS Learning Model ( Assurance , Relevance , Interest , Assessment , Satisfaction ) And Their Effect on Madrasah Tsanawiyah Student Creativity,” J. Gen. Educ. Humanit., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 39–46, 2022.

A. Muthik, A. Muchyidin, and A. R. Persada, “The Effectiveness Of Students ’ Learning Motivation On Learning Outcomes Using The Reciprocal Teaching Learning Model,” J. Gen. Educ. Humanit., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 21–30, 2022.

J. Nielsen and R. Livernoche, “The Indigenous Work-integrated Learning Resource Hub : A needs-based approach to addressing barriers and opportunities for Indigenous students,” 2International J. Work. Learn., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 139–152, 2022.

N. Arney, “A relational understanding of learning : Supporting Indigenous work-integrated learning students,” Int. J. Work. Learn., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 153–167, 2022.

L. Lopriore, “Reframing teaching knowledge in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): A European perspective,” Lang. Teach. Res., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 94–104, 2020, doi: 10.1177/1362168818777518.

N. Harr, A. Eichler, and A. Renkl, “Integrated learning: Ways of fostering the applicability of teachers’ pedagogical and psychological knowledge,” Front. Psychol., vol. 6, no. JUN, pp. 1–16, 2015, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00738.

B. A. Dean and M. J. Eady, “Local Indigenous perspectives and partnerships: Enhancing work-integrated learning Project DARE View project Tokai Project View project,” Int. J. Work. Learn., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 129–137, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361119348.

J. B. Leonard, “Integrative learning: A grounded theory,” Issues Integr. Stud., vol. 30, no. 30, pp. 48–74, 2012.

C. Dalton-Puffer, “Content-and-language integrated learning: From practice to principles?,” Annu. Rev. Appl. Linguist., vol. 31, no. January 2016, pp. 182–204, 2011, doi: 10.1017/S0267190511000092.

M. Syaeful et al., “Development of Nested-Integrated Learning Model in Indonesian Subjects Based on 21 st Century Learning Article Info,” Innov. J. Curric. Educ. Technol., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 10–16, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujet/article/view/33130.

NCTM, Principles and Standards For School Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM, 2000.

Rusman, Model- model Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2012.

E. . Ruseffendi, Dasar-dasar Penelitian Pendidikan dan Bidang Non- Eksakta Lainnya. Bandung: Tarsito, 2005.

Subana and Sudrajat, Dasar-Dasar Penelitian Ilmiah. Bandung: Pustaka Setia, 2003.

E. Suherman, Stategi Belajar Mengajar Matematika Kontemporer. Bandung: JICA-Univesrtisa Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI), 2001.

E. Suherman, Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika Kontemporer. Bandung: JICA, 2003.

Downloads

Published

2022-03-21

How to Cite

[1]
K. Kosim, “Application Ability of Students in Integrated Computer-Aided Numerical Analysis Learning”, J.Math.Instr.Soc.Res.Opin., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 54–62, Mar. 2022.

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022): March

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Mathematics Instruction, Social Research and Opinion (MISRO)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.