Exploring Secondary Students’ Questioning Behaviour and Skills: A Needs Analysis for Formative Assessment Development in Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v5i5.2235

Authors

  • Budi Manfaat Universitas Islam Negeri Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8564-4689
  • Bayu Sukmaangara Universitas Islam Negeri Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon

Keywords:

Formative assessment, Need Analysis, Questioning skills, Student questions

Abstract

Students’ questions reveal how they are constructing knowledge, yet secondary students ask few questions in class, and this is commonly attributed to a lack of teacher-provided opportunity or to students’ fear. Little is known about how secondary students themselves account for their questioning, and formative assessment instruments for questioning seldom start from such accounts. This exploratory study, the needs analysis phase of a design-based project, examined Indonesian secondary students’ self-reported questioning to inform a formative assessment instrument for questioning skills. Fifty-two students in grades 7–12, recruited online through non-probability convenience sampling, completed a researcher-developed questionnaire (four closed and three open items) that had not undergone expert validation or pilot testing. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, cross-tabulation, double coding of question depth, and thematic analysis. Although 90.4% of students reported that teachers frequently invite questions and 90.4% reported feeling comfortable asking, only 40.4% reported asking often; all measures were self-reported, and classroom behaviour was not observed. All 14 students who rarely asked reported frequent opportunities. Only 25.0% of the recalled example questions sought an explanation or a reason, and one third of students did not provide a formulated question, a result that may partly reflect recall difficulty. Students’ suggestions largely repeated teacher-led question-and-answer. The findings tentatively suggest that permission alone is insufficient and that students may need stimuli that provoke curiosity and support in formulating questions. Five design principles are proposed to guide instrument development; their effectiveness has yet to be evaluated, and the small, self-selected sample limits generalisation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

C. Chin and J. Osborne, “Students’ questions: a potential resource for teaching and learning science,” Studies in Science Education, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 1–39, Mar. 2008, doi: 10.1080/03057260701828101.

L. S. Vygotskij and M. Cole, Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press, 1978.

C. Chin and D. E. Brown, “Student-generated questions: A meaningful aspect of learning in science,” International Journal of Science Education, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 521–549, 2002, doi: 10.1080/09500690110095249.

G. Loewenstein, “The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 75–98, 1994, doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.75.

N. Miyake and D. A. Norman, “To ask a question, one must know enough to know what is not known,” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 357–364, 1979, doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90200-7.

A. M. Ryan, P. R. Pintrich, and C. Midgley, “Avoiding seeking help in the classroom: Who and why?,” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 93–114, Jun. 2001, doi: 10.1023/A:1009013420053.

E. M. Nadile et al., “Call on me! Undergraduates’ perceptions of voluntarily asking and answering questions in front of large-enrollment science classes,” PLoS ONE, vol. 16, no. 1, p. e0243731, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243731.

J. T. Dillon, “The remedial status of student questioning,” Journal of Curriculum Studies, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 197–210, May 1988, doi: 10.1080/0022027880200301.

A. C. Graesser and N. K. Person, “Question Asking During Tutoring,” American Educational Research Journal, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 104–137, Mar. 1994, doi: 10.3102/00028312031001104.

A. N. Salamah, E. Erman, and E. Susiyawati, “Analisis Keterampilan Bertanya Siswa Kelas VIII pada Mata Pelajaran IPA,” pendipa. jurnal. pendik. sains, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 704–711, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.33369/pendipa.6.3.704-711.

J. Flašar, L. Krajňáková, and M. Hanus, “From inquiry to insight: analysing lower and upper secondary students’ questioning in geoscience education,” Research in Science & Technological Education, pp. 1–23, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.1080/02635143.2025.2609630.

D. R. Lestari and D. Puspitasari, “Exploring Teachers’ Questioning Strategies in an EFL Classroom Interaction: A Case Study of A Vocational High School,” Berumpun: International Journal of Social, Politics, and Humanities, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 72–85, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.33019/berumpun.v5i2.96.

R. E. Hughes and P. Marhatta, “Learning to ask their own questions: How elementary students develop social studies inquiry questions,” Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 127, p. 104094, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2023.104094.

P. Black and D. Wiliam, “Assessment and Classroom Learning,” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 7–74, Mar. 1998, doi: 10.1080/0969595980050102.

J. Hattie and H. Timperley, “The Power of Feedback,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 81–112, Mar. 2007, doi: 10.3102/003465430298487.

D. R. Sadler, “Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems,” Instructional Science, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 119–144, Jun. 1989, doi: 10.1007/BF00117714.

H. Lee, H. Q. Chung, Y. Zhang, J. Abedi, and M. Warschauer, “The Effectiveness and Features of Formative Assessment in US K-12 Education: A Systematic Review,” Applied Measurement in Education, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 124–140, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1080/08957347.2020.1732383.

Q. Xuan, A. Cheung, and D. Sun, “The effectiveness of formative assessment for enhancing reading achievement in K-12 classrooms: A meta-analysis,” front. Psychol., vol. 13, p. 990196, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.990196.

P. Karaman, “The Effect of Formative Assessment Practices on Student Learning: A Meta-Analysis Study,” International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 801–817, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.21449/ijate.870300.

M. Araceli Ruiz-Primo and E. M. Furtak, “Informal Formative Assessment and Scientific Inquiry: Exploring Teachers’ Practices and Student Learning,” Educational Assessment, vol. 11, no. 3–4, pp. 237–263, Nov. 2006, doi: 10.1080/10627197.2006.9652991.

C. Chin, “Classroom Interaction in Science: Teacher questioning and feedback to students’ responses,” International Journal of Science Education, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 1315–1346, Sep. 2006, doi: 10.1080/09500690600621100.

P. Bernard, K. Dudek-Różycki, and K. Orwat, “Integration of inquiry-based instruction with formative assessment: the case of experienced chemistry teachers,” Journal of Baltic Science Education, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 184–196, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.33225/jbse/19.18.184.

M. Ganajová, I. Sotáková, S. Lukáč, Z. Ješková, V. Jurková, and R. Orosová, “Formative Assessment As A Tool To Enhance The Development Of Inquiry Skills In Science Education,” JBSE, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 204–222, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.33225/jbse/21.20.204.

M. Grangeat, C. Harrison, and J. Dolin, “Exploring assessment in STEM inquiry learning classrooms,” International Journal of Science Education, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 345–361, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1080/09500693.2021.1903617.

Y. J. Dori and O. Herscovitz, “Question-posing capability as an alternative evaluation method: Analysis of an environmental case study,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 411–430, Apr. 1999, doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199904)36:4<411::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-E.

Y.-F. Lan and P.-C. Lin, “Evaluation and improvement of student’s question-posing ability in a web-based learning environment,” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 27, no. 4, Aug. 2011, doi: 10.14742/ajet.939.

H. Pedrosa De Jesus and A. C. Moreira, “The role of students’ questions in aligning teaching, learning and assessment: a case study from undergraduate sciences,” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 193–208, Apr. 2009, doi: 10.1080/02602930801955952.

A. S. Kusuma, D. Setiadi, and B. S. Handayani, “Pengembangan Instrumen Questioning Skills Berdasarkan Domain Kognitif Taksonomi Bloom Revisi Untuk Evaluasi Kemampuan Bertanya Siswa SMA Pada Pembelajaran Biologi,” Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 2668–2680, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.29303/jipp.v8i4.1764.

A. King, “Guiding Knowledge Construction in the Classroom: Effects of Teaching Children How to Question and How to Explain,” American Educational Research Journal, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 338–368, Jun. 1994, doi: 10.3102/00028312031002338.

B. Rosenshine, C. Meister, and S. Chapman, “Teaching Students to Generate Questions: A Review of the Intervention Studies,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 181–221, Jun. 1996, doi: 10.3102/00346543066002181.

D. Rothstein and L. Santana, Make just one change: teach students to ask their own questions. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard Education Press, 2011.

S. Clark, A. G. Harbaugh, and S. Seider, “Fostering adolescent curiosity through a question brainstorming intervention,” Journal of Adolescence, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 98–112, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.07.007.

C. Causey and A. Spencer, “Student-generated questions: An exploration of an instructional strategy with young children,” Thinking Skills and Creativity, vol. 53, p. 101608, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101608.

E. Aflalo, “Students generating questions as a way of learning,” Active Learning in Higher Education, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 63–75, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1177/1469787418769120.

The Design-Based Research Collective, “Design-Based Research: An Emerging Paradigm for Educational Inquiry,” Educational Researcher, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 5–8, Jan. 2003, doi: 10.3102/0013189X032001005.

I. Etikan, S. A. Musa, and R. S. Alkassim, “Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling,” American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 1, 2016, doi: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11.

M. S. Allen, D. Iliescu, and S. Greiff, “Single item measures in psychological science: A call to action,” European Journal of Psychological Assessment, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2022, doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000699.

L. W. Anderson and D. R. Krathwohl, Eds., A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives, Complete ed. New York: Longman, 2001.

J. Cohen, “A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales,” Educational and Psychological Measurement, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 37–46, Apr. 1960, doi: 10.1177/001316446002000104.

V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, Jan. 2006, doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

L. Maplethorpe, H. Kim, M. R. Hunte, M. Vincett, and E. E. Jang, “Student-Generated Questions in Literacy Education and Assessment,” Journal of Literacy Research, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 74–97, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1177/1086296X221076436.

E. A. Silver, “On Mathematical Problem Posing,” For the Learning of Mathematics, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 19–28, 1994.

D. Wood, J. S. Bruner, and G. Ross, “The role of tutoring in problem solving,” Child Psychology Psychiatry, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 89–100, Apr. 1976, doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2026-10-29

How to Cite

[1]
B. Manfaat and B. Sukmaangara, “Exploring Secondary Students’ Questioning Behaviour and Skills: A Needs Analysis for Formative Assessment Development in Indonesia”, J.Gen.Educ.Humanit., vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 6843–6860, Oct. 2026.

Issue

Section

Articles