Teachers’ Challenges in Integrating 4Cs in General English Reading Instruction: Evidence from an Intensive English Program

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v5i3.1446

Authors

  • Farouk Imam Arrasyid Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Sri Wuli Fitriati Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Puji Astuti Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Zulfa Sakhiyya Universitas Negeri Semarang

Keywords:

4Cs, EFL, Intensive English Program, Reading Instruction, Teacher Challenges, Thematic Analysis

Abstract

The integration of 21st-century skills (4Cs) in EFL reading instruction has become a central expectation in higher education; however, its implementation in General English contexts remains uneven, particularly in Intensive English Programs (IEPs). This study aimed to investigate the difficulties lecturers encounter in integrating critical thinking, communication, collaboration, and creativity into reading instruction at UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon. Using a qualitative case study design, data were gathered through classroom observations, semi-structured interviews with three lecturers, and document analysis of instructional materials. The data were analyzed thematically following Braun and Clarke’s framework. The findings revealed six interconnected challenges: procedural reading tasks, low cognitive demand, limited instructional time, superficial collaboration practices, insufficient cognitively directive instructional language, and assessment practices that prioritized accuracy over reasoning. These challenges indicate that the integration of the 4Cs is constrained not only by lecturers’ pedagogical decisions but also by task design, classroom implementation, and institutional program demands. The study concludes that effective integration of 4Cs in reading instruction requires greater attention to micro-level instructional design rather than relying solely on general pedagogical awareness. It is recommended that lecturers incorporate cognitively directive tasks, structured collaborative activities, and assessment practices emphasizing reasoning and interpretation. These findings contribute to a more nuanced understanding of how 4Cs can be operationalized in intensive EFL contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

K. F. Geisinger, “21st century skills: What are they and how do we assess them?,” Appl. Meas. Educ., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 245–249, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2016.1209207

E. Care, C. Scoular, and P. Griffin, “Assessment of collaborative problem solving in education environments,” Appl. Meas. Educ., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 250–264, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2016.1209204

A. Lorenceau, C. Marec, and T. Mostafa, “Upgrading the ICT questionnaire items in PISA 2021,” 2019. https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/d0f94dc7-en

K.-L. Huang, Y. Liu, and M.-Q. Dong, “Incorporating AIGC into design ideation: A study on self-efficacy and learning experience acceptance under higher-order thinking,” Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 52, p. 101508, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101508

A. B. Dickey, “A Quasi-Experimental Study of the Use of Higher-Order Questions to Improve Reading Comprehension in Beginning Readers,” 2018, Northcentral University.

J. S. Barrot, “Facebook as a learning environment for language teaching and learning: A critical analysis of the literature from 2010 to 2017,” J. Comput. Assist. Learn., vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 863–875, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12295

H. Alismail, “21st century standards and curriculum: Current research and practice,” J. Educ. Pract., 2015.

J. M. Castro-Carracedo, “INSPIRing Change in English Language Teacher Education Integrating 21st Century Skills and Critical Pedagogy,” Педагогика, vol. 96, no. 9, pp. 1254–1273, 2024. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=1283148

J. Macalister and I. S. P. Nation, Language curriculum design. Routledge, 2019. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429203763

C. Redecker, European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. 2017. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC107466

D. Imamyartha et al., “The efficacy of 4Cs-based reading to foster 21st-century learning competencies,” Indones. J. Appl. Linguist., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 275–285, 2019. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v9i2.20218

C. García, E. Argelagós, and J. Privado, “Assessing the impact of the four-component instructional design (4C/ID) model on the learning of information problem-solving skills for writing academic texts,” Int. J. Inf. Learn. Technol., vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 329–340, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-06-2024-0104

R. K. Yin, Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage publications, 2017.

V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qual. Res. Psychol., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

R. AlAli and Y. Wardat, “Low PISA performance students: Factors, perceptions, and improvement strategies,” Int. J. Relig., vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 334–348, 2024. https://doi.org/10.61707/nve8gj33

D. S. McNamara, M. E. Jacovina, and L. K. Allen, “Higher order thinking in comprehension,” in Handbook of Individual Differences in Reading, Routledge, 2015, pp. 164–176. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203075562-13

L. E. Richland and N. Simms, “Analogy, higher order thinking, and education,” Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Cogn. Sci., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 177–192, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1336

G. McPhail, “The search for deep learning: A curriculum coherence model,” J. Curric. Stud., vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 420–434, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2020.1748231

A. Saleh, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, and K. D. Glazewski, “Collaborative interactions in inquiry learning,” in International handbook of inquiry and learning, Routledge, 2021, pp. 239–255. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315685779-16

M. Zhang and M. Li, “Collaborative reading for writing: an innovative task in academic settings,” Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn., vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 892–927, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2023.2236146

A. Chraa and M. Alidrissi, “Optimizing EFL Learners’ Outcomes in Formative Assessment through Educational Technology Integration,” Int. J. Lang. Lit. Stud., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 456–486, 2025. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v7i3.2141

B. Thornhill-Miller et al., “Creativity, critical thinking, communication, and collaboration: Assessment, certification, and promotion of 21st century skills for the future of work and education,” J. Intell., vol. 11, no. 3, p. 54, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030054

H. I. Braun, R. J. Shavelson, O. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, and K. Borowiec, “Performance assessment of critical thinking: Conceptualization, design, and implementation,” in Frontiers in Education, Frontiers Media SA, 2020, p. 156. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00156

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2026-06-01

How to Cite

[1]
F. I. Arrasyid, S. W. Fitriati, P. Astuti, and Z. Sakhiyya, “Teachers’ Challenges in Integrating 4Cs in General English Reading Instruction: Evidence from an Intensive English Program”, J.Gen.Educ.Humanit., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 3287–3300, Jun. 2026.

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)