Comparative Analysis of the SMARTER and ELECTRE Methods for Determining Priority Recipients of Free Legal Aid

Susi Widyastuti; Wahyu Ariandi; Muhammad Erwanto; Wilda Adela Pusriyanto

doi:10.58421/gehu.v5i1.969

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v5i1.969

Authors

Susi Widyastuti Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Komputer Poltek Cirebon https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5096-5671
Wahyu Ariandi Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Komputer Poltek Cirebon
Muhammad Erwanto Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Komputer Poltek Cirebon
Wilda Adela Pusriyanto Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Komputer Poltek Cirebon

Keywords:

Decision Support System, Electre Method, Free Legal Aid, Prodeo, SMARTER Method

Abstract

Access to justice is a fundamental right guaranteed to every citizen by the Constitution. One implementation is the prodeo service, which covers court fees for those with financial difficulties. However, the implementation of prodeo services at the Cirebon City Religious Court still faces challenges in determining recipient priority due to the lack of a multi-criteria decision-making mechanism capable of objectively and measurably assessing various aspects. This study aims to provide recommendations for methods that can assist the court in determining the priority of prodeo service recipients in a transparent, fast, and targeted manner. The methods used are Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM), namely SMARTER (Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique Exploiting Ranks) and ELECTRE (Elimination Et Choix Traduisant la Realite). The study was conducted using a quantitative, descriptive-comparative approach, based on Prodeo application data that includes criteria such as income level, number of dependents, health conditions, and case urgency. The results showed that both methods produced objective, transparent priority rankings of prodeo recipients, but differed in computational complexity and efficiency. The SMARTER method had advantages in simplicity and processing speed, while the ELECTRE method excelled at considering dominance among alternatives with high accuracy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

M. Salim, “Akses terhadap keadilan dan pemberdayaan hukum sebagai pendekatan untuk pengembangan hukum bagi orang miskin dan yang terpinggirkan,” vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 153–162, 2018.

I. N. S. Gusti Bagus Windu Sada, A.A Sagung Laksmi Dewi, “Penyelesaian Perkara Secara Prodeo ( Studi Kasus Di Pengadilan Negeri Denpasar ),” vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 35–39, 2023.

A. A. Kurniawan, “Perbandingan Penerapan Asas Peradilan Sederhana, Cepat Dan Biaya Ringan Dalam Perkara Perceraian Di Peradilan Agama Dan Peradilan Umum.” 2011.

U. M. Kahar and N. Trisna, “Implementasi Beracara Secara Prodeo di Pengadilan Negeri Meulaboh ( Studi Kasus Di Pengadilan Negeri Meulaboh ),” vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 253–265, 2023.

S. Andryana, M. Iwan, B. Rahman, A. Rahman, and W. Putra, “Enhancing Coffee Marketing Strategies through Multi-Criteria,” vol. 9, no. July, pp. 1374–1380, 2025.

S. N. Sari, “Penerapan Metode SMARTER dalam Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Operator Komputer,” vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 54–61, 2025.

B. Murgante and M. Hajilo, “A Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Approach to Evaluate the Sustainability Indicators in the Villagers ’ Lives in Iran with Emphasis on Earthquake Hazard : A Case Study,” 2017, doi: 10.3390/su9081491.

indah puji astuti Bellani Patnanandi, diah mustikasasri, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Bantuan Pelaku Usaha Mikro Untuk Umkm Menggunakan Algoritma Electre (Elimination And Choice Translation Reality),” vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 115–124, 2022.

B. Bangun, “Implementasi Metode Metode ROC dan Electre dalam Pemilihan Penerima Bantuan Sosial,” vol. 2, no. 3, 2024, doi: 10.58369/biit.v2i3.52.

A. R. N. Fellindha Mada, Resmawan, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menggunakan Metode Electre Dan Metode Topsis Pada Kasus Pemilihan Bakal Calon Ketua Umum Ukm Oikumene Fellindha,” vol. 07, no. 01, pp. 33–48, 2023.

P. Khoshabi, E. Nejati, S. F. Ahmadi, A. Chegini, A. Makui, and R. Ghousi, “Developing a Multi-Criteria Decision Making approach to compare types of classroom furniture considering mismatches for anthropometric measures of university students,” pp. 1–25, 2020, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239297.

I. N. Farida, U. Mahdiyah, A. Fastio, and H. Setiawan, “Sensitivity analysis of the SMARTER and MOORA methods in decision making of achieving students,” vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 168–173, 2022.

M. Erwanto and S. Muthiah, “Perbandingan metode maut dan smart untuk menentukan calon penerima bantuan rumah tidak layak huni pada desa kadipaten,” vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 44–59, 2025.

E. Oktavianti, N. Komala, and F. Nugrahani, “Simple multi attribute rating technique (SMART) method on employee promotions,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1193, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1193/1/012028.

D. Siregar, D. Arisandi, A. Usman, D. Irwan, and R. Rahim, “Research of Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique for Decision Support,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 930, no. 1, 2017, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/930/1/012015.

T. N. I Santosa1, D A Wijaya2, Mulaab3, A Rachmad4, “Development Of Poor Family Selection System Using Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique Exploiting Rank Method Development Of Poor Family Selection System Using Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique Exploiting Rank Method,” 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1569/2/022082.

H. Sulastri, “Assessment of Employee Using Simple Multi- Attribute Technique Exploiting Rank ( SMARTER ) and Behaviorally Anchor Rating Scale ( BARS ) Method,” vol. 04, no. 02, pp. 127–132, 2021.

M. Afdal, W. Ramadhan, and W. Putri, “Implementation of the Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique Exploiting Rank ( SMARTER ) Method for Supporting Reward Decisions Implementasi Metode Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique Exploiting Rank ( SMARTER ) Untuk Pendukung Keputusan Pemberian Reward,” vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2023.

L. Boongasame and V. Boonjing, “A New Approach to Multi-criteria Decision Making ( MCDM ) Using the Fuzzy Binary Relation of the ELECTRE III Method and the Principles of the AHP Method,” no. Mcdm, pp. 325–326.

R. Balich, Y. R. Kaesmetan, T. Informatika, K. Putih, K. Kupang, and N. T. Timur, “Implementasi psi dan electre dalam penentuan spot diving terbaik di kabupaten alor,” vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 4267–4277, 2025.

I. Ayu and Z. Anthasyah, “Langkah-Langkah Metode Fuzzy ELECTRE dalam Penentuan Penerima Bantuan PKH,” vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 172–187, 2024.

A. Praba, R. Pinem, and P. T. Pungkasanti, “Application Elimination Et Choix Traduisant La Realite ( ELECTRE ) On Decission Support System,” vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 106–113, 2018.

M. IŞIK, “Determining Alternative Crops with Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods within the Framework of Land Risk Criteria,” vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 161–170, 2023, doi: 10.15832/ankutbd.930020.

T. O. Hodson, “Mean Squared Error , Deconstructed Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems,” pp. 1–10, 2021, doi: 10.1029/2021MS002681.

N. Hasdyna, “Model Prediksi Prevalensi Stunting Di Provinsi Aceh Menggunakan Pendekatan Regresi Dengan Evaluasi Kinerja Berbasis Mse Dan Rmse,” vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 920–930, 2025, doi: 10.46576/djtechno.

H. Sulastri, G. S. Anwar, E. Nur, and F. Dewi, “Peramalan Stok Barang Percetakan dan ATK Menggunakan Single Moving Average,” vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 59–69, 2023.