A Study on The Implementation of Flashcards in Teaching Vocabulary

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v5i1.951

Authors

  • Fikriani Fikriani Universitas Tadulako
  • Konder Manurung Universitas Tadulako
  • Andi Patmasari Universitas Tadulako
  • Mochtar Marhum Universitas Tadulako

Keywords:

Flashcards, Library, Vocabulary, Implementation, qualitative research

Abstract

The objectives of this research are to describe how flashcards are implemented in vocabulary instruction and how students learn vocabulary through their use. This research applied a qualitative design by using a library research method. The data sources were obtained from libraries and online academic databases. The data were analyzed using content analysis, which involved identifying, categorizing, and describing the information from the selected studies. The six previous studies analyzed in this research were conducted by Yusriadi (2021), Mita Agustina Hediyati (2021), Widya Astuti (2022), Fitri Harianingsih (2023), Lisa Febrianti (2024), and Yudit Ba’dung (2024). The results of the data analysis showed that flashcards were used in various ways depending on students’ levels, classroom conditions, and the research design. Generally, the teaching procedures involved introducing vocabulary using flashcards, explaining word meanings through pictures, practicing pronunciation, and reinforcing learning through drilling and repetition activities. The findings revealed that students learned vocabulary effectively through flashcards. Flashcards helped students understand vocabulary more easily through visual media, improve pronunciation through repetition, and remember vocabulary through continuous practice. In quantitative studies, students showed improvement in vocabulary mastery, as indicated by higher post-test scores than pre-test scores, while in qualitative studies, students demonstrated greater engagement, motivation, and understanding of vocabulary. Overall, this study concludes that flashcards are an effective medium that supports both teaching and learning in vocabulary instruction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

F. Fauziati, “The effects of error treatment on interlanguage of Indonesian learners learning English as a foreign language,” Kajian Linguistik dan Sastra, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 135–145, Dec. 2010, doi: 10.23917/kls.v22i2.4392.

I. S. P. Nation, Learning Vocabulary in Another Language, 2nd ed. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2013, doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139858656.

Rohmatillah, “A study on students’ difficulties in learning vocabulary,” Undergraduate thesis, Dept. English Education, Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Raden Intan Lampung, Lampung, Indonesia, 2015.

N. Schmitt, Vocabulary in Language Teaching. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2000.

R. L. Oxford and R. C. Scarcella, “Second language vocabulary learning among adults: State of the art in vocabulary instruction,” System, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 231–243, 1994, doi: 10.1016/0346-251X(94)90059-0.

B. Y. C. Widiati and U. Cahyono, “The teaching of EFL vocabulary in the Indonesian context: The state of the art,” TEFLIN Journal, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2008.

S. Thornbury, How to Teach Vocabulary. Harlow, U.K.: Longman, 2002.

S. M. Waruwu, “The effect of using flashcard media on students’ vocabulary mastery,” Jurnal Liner, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 18–31, 2020.

F. Lehr, J. Osborn, and E. H. Hiebert, *A Focus on Vocabulary*. Honolulu, HI: Pacific Resources for Education and Learning, 2004.

A. Paivio, Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press, 1986.

R. Heinich, Technology and the Management of Instruction. New York, NY, USA: IAP, 2000.

A. Wright, Pictures for Language Learning. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 1989.

J. W. Creswell,“Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches,”3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage Publications, 2013.

M. Zed, Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Jakarta, Indonesia: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia, 2004.

Khatibah, “Penelitian kepustakaan,” Jurnal Iqra’, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 36–39, 2011.

J. R. Fraenkel, N. E. Wallen, and H. H. Hyun,How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education, 10th ed. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill Education, 2019.

A. Luo, “Content Analysis | Guide, Methods & Examples,” Scribbr. [Online]. Available: https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/content-analysis/

M. Sari and A. Asmendri, “Penelitian Kepustakaan (Library Research) dalam Penelitian Pendidikan IPA,” Natural Science, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 41–53, 2020, doi: 10.15548/nsc.v6i1.1555.

H. D. Brown, Principles of Language Learning and Teaching, 5th ed. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education, 2007.

I. S. P. Nation and S. A. Webb, Researching and Analyzing Vocabulary. Boston, MA: Heinle, Cengage Learning, 2011.

J. Harmer, "How to Teach English", 2nd ed. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education Limited, 2007.

L. Cameron, Teaching Languages to Young Learners. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2001. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511733109.

R. E. Mayer, Multimedia Learning, 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

J. C. Richards and T. S. Rodgers, Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching, 3rd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2014. DOI: 10.1017/9781009024532.

R. Ellis, Task-Based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2003.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2026-02-11

How to Cite

[1]
F. Fikriani, K. Manurung, A. Patmasari, and M. Marhum, “A Study on The Implementation of Flashcards in Teaching Vocabulary ”, J.Gen.Educ.Humanit., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1319–1330, Feb. 2026.

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): February

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of General Education and Humanities

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3