Spatial and Numerical Abilities as Correlates of Academic Achievement in Economics

Rahmon Taiwo Adewale; Ezekiel Olusegun Babatunde

doi:10.58421/gehu.v2i3.76

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v2i3.76

Authors

Rahmon Taiwo Adewale International Centre for Educational Evaluation, University of Ibadan
Ezekiel Olusegun Babatunde Institute of Education, University of Ibadan https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6708-2985

Keywords:

Spatial ability, Numerical ability, Economics achievement, Teachers

Abstract

The school system's primary concern and essential function are improving students' academic performance and producing a pool of skilled human resources to help grow and develop a nation. Despite how vital economics is to society, several factors determine students' choices and interests, among which spatial and numerical abilities are significant. This has led to students’ inability to cope with real-life situations, self-independent, and basic entrepreneurial skills. The paper examined spatial and numerical abilities as correlates of academic achievement in Economics. Four research questions guided the study with three instruments to collect data analyzed using mean, standard deviation, and regression analysis at a 0.05 significance level. The results revealed that the mean of all items is higher than the criterion mean of 0.50. Students had a high level of spatial ability (0.50 < 0.91), but performance in numerical ability was poor (0.50 > 0.43). The relationship between the independent variable revealed a significant positive relationship (r= 0.17, p<0.05(0.00)). There was a significant effect of independent variables on the dependent variable (F(2,997)= 41.093; p<0.05(0.000)). Teachers should be trained on how to incorporate spatial ability in economics classes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

P. M. Shrestha, “Examining the Factors Affecting the Profitability of Commercial Banks,” J. Math. Instr. Soc. Res. Opin., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 105–114, May 2023, doi: 10.58421/misro.v2i2.86.

W.-M. Roth and G. M. Bowen, “When Are Graphs Worth Ten Thousand Words? An Expert-Expert Study,” Cogn. Instr., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 429–473, Mar. 2003, [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3233806.

D. Zetland, C. Russo, and N. Yavapolkul, “TEACHING ECONOMIC PRINCIPLES: ALGEBRA, GRAPH OR BOTH?,” Am. Econ., vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 123–131, Mar. 2010, [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40657833.

E. S. Johnson, “Sex differences in problem solving.,” J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 76, no. 6, pp. 1359–1371, Dec. 1984, doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.76.6.1359.

D. van Garderen, “Spatial Visualization, Visual Imagery, and Mathematical Problem Solving of Students With Varying Abilities,” J. Learn. Disabil., vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 496–506, Nov. 2006, doi: 10.1177/00222194060390060201.

L. M. Phillips, S. P. Norris, and J. S. Macnab, Visualization in Mathematics, Reading and Science Education, vol. 5. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2010.

N. Shoresh and B. Wong, “Data exploration,” Nat. Methods, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 5–5, Jan. 2012, doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1829.

E. Tufte, Visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press, 2001.

V. A. Krutetskii, The Psychology of Mathematical Abilities in Schoolchildren. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press, 1976.

T. Vilkomir and J. O’Donoghue, “Using components of mathematical ability for initial development and identification of mathematically promising students,” Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol., vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 183–199, Mar. 2009, doi: 10.1080/00207390802276200.

V. Koshy, P. Ernest, and R. Casey, “Mathematically gifted and talented learners: theory and practice,” Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol., vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 213–228, Mar. 2009, doi: 10.1080/00207390802566907.

K. A. Gilligan, E. Flouri, and E. K. Farran, “The contribution of spatial ability to mathematics achievement in middle childhood,” J. Exp. Child Psychol., vol. 163, pp. 107–125, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.04.016.

E. Cohn, S. Cohn, D. C. Balch, and J. Bradley, “Do Graphs Promote Learning in Principles of Economics?,” J. Econ. Educ., vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 299–310, Mar. 2001, doi: 10.2307/1182879.

J. N. M. Lagerlöf and A. J. Seltzer, “Effects of Remedial Mathematics on the Learning of Economics BT - Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning,” N. M. Seel, Ed. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2012, pp. 1091–1093.

K. Kucian et al., “Mental number line training in children with developmental dyscalculia,” Neuroimage, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 782–795, Aug. 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.070.

Y.-L. Cheng and K. S. Mix, “Spatial Training Improves Children’s Mathematics Ability,” J. Cogn. Dev., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 2–11, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.1080/15248372.2012.725186.

T. Lowrie, T. Logan, and A. Ramful, “Visuospatial training improves elementary students’ mathematics performance,” Br. J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 170–186, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1111/bjep.12142.

C. Xu and J.-A. LeFevre, “Training young children on sequential relations among numbers and spatial decomposition: Differential transfer to number line and mental transformation tasks.,” Dev. Psychol., vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 854–866, 2016, doi: 10.1037/dev0000124.

Z. Hawes, J. Moss, B. Caswell, and D. Poliszczuk, “Effects of mental rotation training on children’s spatial and mathematics performance: A randomized controlled study,” Trends Neurosci. Educ., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 60–68, Sep. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.tine.2015.05.001.

D. H. Uttal and C. A. Cohen, “Chapter Four - Spatial Thinking and STEM Education: When, Why, and How?,” in The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, vol. 57, B. H. B. T.-P. of L. and M. Ross, Ed. Academic Press, 2012, pp. 147–181.

J. Harris, N. S. Newcombe, and K. Hirsh-Pasek, “A New Twist on Studying the Development of Dynamic Spatial Transformations: Mental Paper Folding in Young Children,” Mind, Brain, Educ., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 49–55, Mar. 2013, doi: 10.1111/mbe.12007.

B. Reilly and R. Bachan, “A comparison of A‐level performance in economics and business studies: How much more difficult is economics?,” Educ. Econ., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 85–108, Mar. 2005, doi: 10.1080/0964529042000325225.

B. Ademola K, “Problem-Based Instructional Strategy and Numerical Ability as Determinants of Senior Secondary Achievement in Mathematics,” J. Educ. Pract., vol. 7, no. 13, pp. 89–95, 2016, [Online]. Available: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ1102799&site=ehost-live.

N. Gültepe, “Reflections on High School Students’ Graphing Skills and Their Conceptual Understanding of Drawing Chemistry Graphs,” Educ. Sci. Theory Pract., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 53–81, 2016, doi: 10.12738/estp.2016.1.2837.

J. C. D. Santos and M. C. L. Boyon, “Numerical and Verbal Reasoning Aptitudes as Predictors of STEM Students’ Performance on Limits and Continuity,” Educ. Meas. Eval. Rev., vol. 11, no. July, pp. 14–24, 2020.