Natural Communication Abilities Among Children with Congenital Deafblindness in Multi-Linguistic Communities of Zambia

Brighton Kumatongo; Douglas Gawani Phiri

doi:10.58421/gehu.v1i3.35

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v1i3.35

Authors

Brighton Kumatongo Kitwe College of Education
Douglas Gawani Phiri Zambia Institute of Special Education

Keywords:

Children, Congenital Deafblindness, Parents, Natural Communication

Abstract

Children with Deafblindness in Zambian communities face communication challenges. Communication forms the basis for human interaction, exchanging ideas and feelings, and facilitating inclusiveness in society. This study, anchored on the theory of dialogism as the theoretical framework, sought to assess the natural communication abilities of children with congenital Deafblindness and further explore measures taken by caregivers/parents to enhance the communication abilities of the children. A qualitative case study was used as the research design. Snowball sampling technique was used to sample three (3) children with congenital Deafblindness aged three (3), eleven (11), and twelve (12) and three (3) parents and one (1) relative who participated in the study, making the total number of (7) seven participants. The participants were from Lusaka, Copperbelt, and Northwestern provinces of Zambia. The findings were that children with congenital Deafblindness could use natural signs to communicate their feelings of happiness, frustration, or discomfort, detect sounds, express mistreatment, and use imitations, tapping, and pointing signs. The study concluded that although children with congenital Deafblindness can communicate, parents 1 and 2 naturally and relative o In contrast, parent 3 was able to communicate with her child with congenital Deafblindness through the use of Hand overhand communication, the object of reference, body contact and hand tactile techniques. The study recommended the need to teach communication techniques to parents and caregivers of children with Deafblindness in order to improve the communication skills of children with Deafblindness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

M. Vervloed and S. Damen, “Language and Communication in People Who are Deafblind,” in The Oxford Handbook of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education: Language and Language Development, M. Marshark and E. Spencer, Eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.

K. Deasy and F. Lyddy, “Exploring Language and Communication in an Individual with Congenital Deafblindness: A Case Study,” 2009. Accessed: Oct. 31, 2022. [Online]. Available: http://ncse.ie/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Exploring_Language_and_Communication.pdf.

M. P. J. Vervloed, R. J. M. Van Dijk, H. Knoors, and J. P. M. Van Dijk, “Interaction between the teacher and the congenitally deafblind child,” Am. Ann. Deaf, vol. 151, no. 3, pp. 336–344, 2006, doi: 10.1353/AAD.2006.0040.

H. Knoors and M. P. J. Vervloed, “Educational Programming for Deaf Children with Multiple Disabilities: Accommodating Special Needs,” in The Oxford Handbook of Deaf Studies, Language, and Education: Second Edition, M. Marschark and P. E. Spencer, Eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003, pp. 82–94.

M. Hersh, “Deafblind People, Communication, Independence, and Isolation,” J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 446–463, Oct. 2013, doi: 10.1093/DEAFED/ENT022.

S. Rutgersson and M. Arvola, “User Interfaces for Persons with Deafblindness,” 2006.

J. E. Downing and D. Chen, “Using Tactile Strategies with Students who are Blind and have Severe Disabilities,” http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/004005990303600208, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 56–61, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.1177/004005990303600208.

S. M. Bruce, “The Impact of Congenital Deafblindness on the Struggle to Symbolism,” http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10349120500252882, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 233–251, Sep. 2007, doi: 10.1080/10349120500252882.

J. Godø, communicative encounter between a fluent signer and a youngster with cdb. 2018.

J. Souriau, “Blended Spaces and Deixis in Communicative Activities Involving Persons with Congenital Deafblindness,” J. Deaf. Stud. Commun., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 5–22, 2015, Accessed: Oct. 31, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://jdbsc.rug.nl/article/view/18632.

G. A. G. C. Forsgren, M. Daelman, and P. Hart, “Sign Construction Based on Heightened Tactile Perception by Persons with Congenital Deafblindness,” J. Deaf. Stud. Commun., vol. 4, no. 1, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.21827/JDBSC.4.31373.

P. Linell, “Aspects and elements of a dialogical approach to language , communication and cognition,” 2004.

P. Linell, Rethinking Language, Mind, and World Dialogically (Hc) (Advances in Cultural Psychology: Constructing Human Developm). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, 2009.

P. Linell, A Dialogical Note-Book: Afterthoughts after Rethinking. Göteborg: Göteborg University, 2013.

C. Debout, “Qualitative case study,” Soins., vol. 61, no. 806, pp. 57–60, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.1016/J.SOIN.2016.04.018.

B. Kumatongo and K. K. Muzata, “Research Paradigms and Designs with their Application in Education,” J. Lexicogr. Terminol., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 16–32, 2021.

H. Taherdoost, “Sampling Methods in Research Methodology; How to Choose a Sampling Technique for Research,” SSRN Electron. J., Apr. 2016, doi: 10.2139/SSRN.3205035.

M. Alvi, A Manual for Selecting Sampling Techniques in Research. Karachi: University of Karachi, Iqra University, 2016.

K. A. Neuendorf, “Content analysis and thematic analysis,” in Research methods for applied psychologists: Design, analysis and reporting, P. Brough, Ed. New York: Routledge, 2019, pp. 211–223.

S. Bonner, “Communication Strategies for Persons with Deafblindness,” 2010. https://enabled.in/wp/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/CommunicationwebModule082312.pdf (accessed Oct. 31, 2022).

A. Gregersen, “Body with Body: Interacting with Children with Congenital Deafblindness in the Human Niche,” 67-83, vol. 4, no. 1, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.21827/JDBSC.4.31374.