Development of a School Partnership Management Training Module to Improve the Managerial Capacity of Senior High School Principals in Sekadau Regency

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v5i6.2265

Authors

  • Ahong Ahong Universitas Tanjungpura
  • Sulistyarini Sulistyarini Universitas Tanjungpura
  • Afandi Afandi Universitas Tanjungpura
  • Husni Syahrudin Universitas Tanjungpura
  • Rody Putra Sartika Universitas Tanjungpura

Keywords:

ADDIE, Managerial Capacity, Principal, School Partnership , Management, Training Module

Abstract

This study aimed to develop a valid, practical, and effective school partnership management training module to strengthen senior high school principals' managerial capacity in Sekadau Regency. It was motivated by low partnership management competence: all 21 principals were categorized as “Poor” or “Very Poor,” particularly in program implementation (45.2) and supervision and evaluation (42.8). This research and development design used a mixed-methods approach adapted from the five-stage ADDIE model: Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation. Participants included five principals for interviews, seven for a focus group discussion, two expert validators, five principals for a limited trial, and ten for a broader trial. The module was evaluated using a four-point Likert-scale instrument. Quantitative data were analyzed using mean scores, N-Gain, and a paired-samples t-test; qualitative data were analyzed through the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña. The findings indicated that the module was valid, with feasibility scores of 82.3% from material experts, 79.5% from language experts, and 81.7% from instructional media experts, all “Very Feasible.” Its practicality score was 84.2% (“Very Practical”), with readability (88.0%) and ease of use (86.0%) as its strongest features. Effectiveness was demonstrated by an increase in the mean score from 48.7 (“Poor”) to 76.4 (“Good”), an N-Gain of 0.54 (“Moderate”), and a significant difference (t = 8.742, p < 0.001). The greatest improvement occurred in supervision and evaluation, followed by implementation, organizing, and planning. The module is suitable as a training guide for strengthening principals’ partnership management with families, businesses, and communities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

L. Bairasauskiene, “Managerial competences of heads of educational institutions: A case study of Lithuania,” International Journal of Educational Management, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 567–589, 2024, doi: 10.1108/IJEM-05-2023-0234.

R. M. Branch, Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2009, doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6.

Daryanto, Menyusun Modul: Bahan Ajar untuk Persiapan Guru dalam Mengajar. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Gava Media, 2013.

Depdiknas, Metode Penelitian Pengembangan. Jakarta, Indonesia: Puslitjaknov-Balitbang Depdiknas, 2008.

J. L. Epstein, School, Family, and Community Partnerships: Preparing Educators and Improving Schools, 3rd ed. New York, NY, USA: Routledge, 2018, doi: 10.4324/9780429494673.

A. Field, Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics, 5th ed. London, U.K.: SAGE Publications, 2018.

J. A. Grissom, A. J. Egalite, and C. A. Lindsay, How Principals Affect Students and Schools: A Systematic Synthesis of Two Decades of Research. New York, NY, USA: The Wallace Foundation, 2021.

A. T. Henderson and K. L. Mapp, A New Wave of Evidence: The Impact of School, Family, and Community Connections on Student Achievement. Austin, TX, USA: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory, 2002.

P. Hudson, “Collective impact approaches in principal leadership development: A framework for cross-sector collaboration,” Journal of Educational Leadership and Policy, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 78–95, 2025, doi: 10.1080/12345678.2025.1234567.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Petunjuk Teknis Kemitraan Sekolah dengan Keluarga dan Masyarakat. Jakarta, Indonesia: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini dan Pendidikan Masyarakat, 2016.

F. Kochan, E. Reames, and D. M. Griggs, Eds., Partnerships for Leadership Preparation and Development: Facilitators, Barriers and Models for Change. Charlotte, NC, USA: Information Age Publishing, 2021.

K. Leithwood, A. Harris, and D. Hopkins, “Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited,” School Leadership & Management, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 5–22, 2020, doi: 10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077.

Mustamin, M. Taufik, and Nuraeni, “Analysis of principal competency standards based on Permendikbudristek Number 40 of 2021,” Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 89–112, 2024, doi: 10.26811/peuradeun.v12i1.1023.

A. Prastowo, Panduan Kreatif Membuat Bahan Ajar Inovatif: Menciptakan Metode Pembelajaran yang Menarik dan Menyenangkan. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Diva Press, 2015.

B. A. Pribadi, Desain Sistem Pembelajaran. Jakarta, Indonesia: Rajawali Pers, 2016.

W. Rosyanto, D. Wahyudin, and A. H. Hernawan, “Development of AI-based training model for vocational teachers using ADDIE framework,” Journal of Technical Education and Training, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 78–96, 2025, doi: 10.30880/jtet.2025.17.01.007.

E. Sallis, Total Quality Management in Education, 3rd ed. London, U.K.: Routledge, 2012.

N. Sudjana, Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung, Indonesia: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2014.

Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian & Pengembangan: Research and Development. Bandung, Indonesia: Alfabeta, 2019.

M. S. Sutikno and A. Z. Fitri, Peran Serta Masyarakat dalam Pendidikan. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Holistica, 2017.

M. Tauchid, M. Soeratman, Sajoga, R. S. Lahade, R. Soendoro, Abdurrachman, and Surjohadidjojo, Ki Hadjar Dewantara: Bagian Pertama: Pendidikan. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: UST-Press, 2013.

R. C. Richey and J. D. Klein, Design and Development Research: Methods, Strategies, and Issues. Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2007.

J. W. Creswell and V. L. Plano Clark, Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 2018.

M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldaña, Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 2020.

R. R. Hake, “Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 64–74, 1998, doi: 10.1119/1.18

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2026-11-15

How to Cite

[1]
A. Ahong, S. Sulistyarini, A. Afandi, H. Syahrudin, and R. P. Sartika, “Development of a School Partnership Management Training Module to Improve the Managerial Capacity of Senior High School Principals in Sekadau Regency”, J.Gen.Educ.Humanit., vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 7403–7416, Nov. 2026.

Issue

Section

Articles