Gender Perspective in Tayub Dance and Sustainable Agriculture

Eko Wahyu Prihantoro; Harini Setyasih; Wisnu Samodra; Dwiyasmono Dwiyasmono

doi:10.58421/gehu.v5i5.2171

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v5i5.2171

Authors

Eko Wahyu Prihantoro Indonesia and Institut Seni Indonesia Surakarta
Harini Setyasih Slamet Riyadi University of Surakarta
Wisnu Samodra Indonesia and Institut Seni Indonesia Surakarta
Dwiyasmono Dwiyasmono Indonesia and Institut Seni Indonesia Surakarta

Keywords:

gender, tayub, sustainable agriculture, Perspective

Abstract

Tayub dance represents a significant cultural phenomenon within Indonesian society, as its emergence and continued existence are inextricably linked to environmental influences including the community, nature, culture, and agriculture. While numerous existing articles discuss the art of Tayub, most focus on its rituals, history, or humanistic aspects; in contrast, this article specifically examines the existence of Tayub in relation to feminism and sustainable agriculture. Thus, this study aims to explore gender perspectives within Tayub dance and its relevance to sustainable agriculture. Employing a descriptive qualitative method, the study utilizes secondary data collected from books, newspapers, journals, and articles on reputable websites. The findings reveal the distinct role women play in agricultural activities spanning planting, crop maintenance, and harvesting, demonstrating harmony among all family and community members within middle-class and grassroots populations. The article concludes that Tayub is rooted in the lower strata of society rather than the aristocracy, reflecting harmony among rural community members encompassing not only patriarchal groups but also women. Consequently, this research offers valuable insights into the intersections of culture, humanism, and sustainable agriculture for interested parties.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

S. Andréfouët, M. Paul, and A. R. Farhan, “Indonesia’s 13558 islands: A new census from space and a first step towards a One Map for Small Islands Policy,” Mar. Policy, vol. 135, p. 104848, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104848.

Badan Pusat Statistik, “Statistik Politik 2013,” Badan Pusat Statistik, Jakarta, Indonesia, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://www.bps.go.id/en/publication/2013/12/23/06eec4b56101edb3242d5245/political-statistics-2013.html

M. Agrevinna, B. Sudardi, S. T. Widodo, and S. K. Habsari, “A systematic literature review of Javanese cultural transformation under modernisation and globalisation,” Discover Global Society, vol. 4, no. 167, 2026, doi: 10.1007/s44282-026-00516-1.

P. Ronaldo, “Kajian nilai-nilai filosofis kesenian wayang kulit dalam kehidupan masyarakat Jawa,” Jurnal Ilmu Budaya, vol. 11, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.34050/jib.v11i1.24349.

D. Setiawan, A. B. Anggoro, and R. Knott, “The Javanese Philosophy of Memayu Hayuning Bawana and Religious Moderation in Central Java,” Dialog, vol. 48, no. 2, 2025, doi: 10.47655/dialog.v48i2.1195.

J. Newberry, “Rituals of Rule in the Administered Community: The Javanese Slametan Reconsidered,” Mod. Asian Stud., vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1295–1329, 2007, doi: 10.1017/S0026749X06002575.

Katadata, “Javanese people constitute 40 percent of Indonesia’s population,” 2018. [Online]. Available: https://databoks.katadata.co.id/en/demographics/statistics/7c8cacaffaa09ff/javanese-people-constitute-40-percent-of-indonesias-population

Darmoko, “Dinamika Kehidupan Tayub atau Tayuban dalam Masyarakat dan Kebudayaan Indonesia - Jawa,” Jurnal IKADBUDI, vol. 2, no. 12, 2016, doi: 10.21831/ikadbudi.v2i12.12095.

N. Noordiana, A. Juwariyah, and F. Inda, “The Impact of Tayub Exploitation on The Tradition and Life of Javanese Society,” Harmonia: Journal of Arts Research and Education, vol. 16, no. 2, 2016, doi: 10.15294/harmonia.v16i2.7514.

K. Hikmah and S. I. Pebrianti, “Bentuk pertunjukan Tayub dalam upacara ritual Sedekah Bumi desa Ronggomulyo Sumber Rembang,” Imaji: Jurnal Seni dan Pendidikan Seni, vol. 23, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.21831/imaji.v23i1.60139.

Suharji, “Tari Tayub sebagai Sarana Upacara Ritual di Desa Wonosoco Kecamatan Undaan Kudus,” Acintya, vol. 6, no. 1, 2014, doi: 10.33153/acy.v6i1.191.

R. Rahayuningsih, “Fungsi dan peranan tari tayub dalam upacara bersih desa di Dukuh Ngorean, Ngandong, Gantiwarno, Klaten.” [Online]. Available: https://opac.isi.ac.id/index.php?id=20081&p=show_detail

S. D. Suryani, “Tayub as a Symbolic Interaction Medium in Sedekah Bumi Ritual in Pati Regency,” Harmonia: Journal of Arts Research and Education, vol. 14, no. 2, 2014, doi: 10.15294/harmonia.v14i2.3291.

N. I. K. Nisa’, D. A. Sukowati, and K. R. Adi, “Kesenian Tari Tayub dan Kue Hantaran sebagai kearifan lokal dalam Tradisi Sedekah Bumi di Kabupaten Pati,” Jurnal Integrasi dan Harmoni Inovatif Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, vol. 1, no. 10, pp. 1090–1095, 2021, doi: 10.17977/um063v1i10p1090-1095.

P. D. Tempo, Asal-Usul dan Perkembangan Tari Tayub. Jakarta, Indonesia: Tempo Publishing, 2019.

A. B. F. Purba, “Mengenal makna Tari Tayub dari Nganjuk, sejarah hingga kontroversinya,” detikJatim, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.detik.com/jatim/budaya/d-7307047/mengenal-makna-tari-tayub-dari-nganjuk-sejarah-hingga-kontroversinya

A. Haro and L. Judijanto, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif: Teori dan Penerapan Praktis Analisis Data Berbasis Studi Kasus. Jambi, Indonesia: PT Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia, 2026.

R. F. Fuadi and R. M. Sari, “Gerakan Ekofeminisme dalam Mewujudkan Tujuan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan (SDG’s),” Equalita: Jurnal Studi Gender dan Anak, vol. 5, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.24235/equalita.v5i2.21291.

E. Foster, “Ecofeminism revisited: critical insights on contemporary environmental governance,” Feminist Theory, vol. 22, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.1177/1464700120988639.

A. Alawiyyah, G. N. S. Nur, and F. Zainuddin, “Muslim Philanthropic Organization, Ecofeminism and Its Contribution to Sustainable Development in Banten, Indonesia,” Jurnal Kawistara, vol. 15, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.22146/kawistara.96474.

R. Panigrahi and H. S. Ranawat, “Ecofeminism: The ethics and aesthetics,” SANGAM International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, vol. 2, no. 2, 2025.

H. Eaton and L. A. Lorentzen, Ecofeminism and Globalization: Exploring Culture, Context, and Religion. Lanham, MD, USA: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2003.

M. Mies and V. Shiva, “Ecofeminism,” in Feminisms, Oxford University Press, 1998, pp. 497–502. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780192892706.003.0088.

A. M. Hay, “Ecofeminism,” in Oxford Bibliographies in Environmental History, Oxford University Press, 2025. doi: 10.1093/obo/9780197768709-0032.

A. Salleh, M. Mellor, K. N. Farrell, and V. Shiva, “How ecofeminists use complexity in ecological economics,” in Beyond Reductionism: A Passion for Interdisciplinarity, Taylor and Francis, 2013, pp. 154–178. doi: 10.4324/9780203112281-17.

S. Lahar, “Ecofeminist Theory and Grassroots Politics,” Hypatia, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 28–45, 1991, doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.1991.tb00207.x.

T. Link, “Kenali 10 kearifan lokal tradisi pertanian di Indonesia,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://tanilink.com/bacaberita/437/kenali-10-kearifan-lokal-tradisi-pertanian-di-indonesia/

S. A. Wintala, Falsafah Kepemimpinan Jawa: Dari Sultan Agung hingga Hamengku Buwono IX. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Araska Publishing, 2018.

H. Eaton, “Ecofeminist Theologies in the Age of Climate Crisis,” Feminist Theology, vol. 29, no. 3, 2021, doi: 10.1177/09667350211000605.

E. Ratih E.W., M. Malarsih, and W. Lestari, “Citra Wanita dalam Pertunjukan Kesenian Tayub (The Woman Image in the Tayub Art Performance),” Harmonia: Journal of Arts Research and Education, vol. 6, no. 2, 2005, doi: 10.15294/harmonia.v6i2.725.