University Students’ Perceptions of Social Factors Influencing English Writing in Jakarta and South Tangerang

Haryati

doi:10.58421/gehu.v5i5.2115

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v5i5.2115

Authors

Haryati Universitas Pamulang

Keywords:

Effect, Social Factors, University Students, Writing Ability

Abstract

This study explores the social factors influencing university students’ English writing achievement in Jakarta and Tangerang Selatan, along with students’ perceptions of how these factors affect their writing performance. Employing a mixed-methods descriptive design, the research combines a survey of 100 English Education students across two universities with semi-structured interviews involving a sub-sample of 12 students to gain deeper insights. Data were collected using Likert-scale questionnaires to identify key social factors and analyzed descriptively, supported by qualitative thematic analysis of the interview transcripts. The findings reveal that students perceive several key social dimensions as influential to their writing development, including sociolinguistic background, socio-economic status and access to literacy resources, engagement with social media and online communities, the lecturer’s role and academic environment, family support, and peer dynamics. Moreover, these social factors present both opportunities and challenges for students’ writing proficiency. On one hand, social interactions enable students to model essay structures, exchange ideas, and learn proper mechanics, citations, and references. On the other hand, students face notable hurdles, such as difficulty accepting critique from peers and instructors, limited guidance due to large class sizes, and challenges in synthesizing expert ideas with their own understanding. Overall, the study underscores the need for targeted instructional support and improved feedback mechanisms in higher education writing contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

R. Akhtar, H. Hassan, A. Saidalvi, and S. Hussain, “A systematic review of the challenges and solutions of ESL students’ academic writing,” International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 1169–1171, 2019, doi: 10.35940/ijeat.E1164.0585C19.

S. Gupta, A. Jaiswal, A. Paramasivam, and J. Kotecha, “Academic writing challenges and supports: Perspectives of international doctoral students and their supervisors,” Frontiers in Education, vol. 7, art. 891534, 2022, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2022.891534.

P. H. Ahmed, “Major writing challenges experienced by EFL learners in Soran University,” Journal of University of Human Development, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 120–126, 2019, doi: 10.21928/juhd.v5n3y2019.pp120-126.

A. W. Li and P. Collins, “Formative feedback across sources: Student perceptions and writing outcomes with instructor, peer, and AI-generated feedback,” Reading & Writing, 2026, doi: 10.1007/s11145-026-10761-0.

K. Gregg, O. Ryan, A. Katz, M. Huerta, and S. Sajadi, “Expanding possibilities for generative AI in qualitative analysis: Fostering student feedback literacy through the application of a feedback quality rubric,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 114, no. 3, art. e70024, 2025, doi: 10.1002/jee.70024.

K. Horvath and M. Steinberg, “Social classification and the changing boundaries of learning: A neopragmatic perspective on social sorting in digital education,” Learning, Media and Technology, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 566–580, 2023, doi: 10.1080/17439884.2023.2219900.

N. Gillani and R. Eynon, “Understanding and improving social factors in education: A computational social science approach,” in Handbook of Computational Social Science, pp. 872–890. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2025, doi: 10.4337/9781802207309.00078.

N. M. Kollapally, J. Geller, P. Morreale, and D. Kwak, “An ontology for social determinants of education (SDoEd) based on human-AI collaborative approach,” arXiv, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.10300

S. Brint, “High-leverage sociological concepts and the progress of theory, part one,” Theory and Society, vol. 54, pp. 705–730, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s11186-025-09607-5.

S. Cao, L. Zhong, and C. Wang, “The impact of student writing assessment literacy on psychological factors: An ordinal logistic regression analysis,” arXiv, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.00004

G. Shulgina, J. Costley, I. Shcheglova, H. Zhang, and N. Sedova, “Online peer editing: The influence of comments, tracked changes and perception of participation on students’ writing performance,” Smart Learning Environments, vol. 11, no. 1, art. 30, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s40561-024-00315-8.

K. Wang, L. J. Zhang, and M. Cooper, “Metacognitive instruction for improving the effectiveness of collaborative writing for EFL learners’ writing development,” The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 661–673, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s40299-024-00886-7.

T. A. Shah, S. Hussain, and S. Rashid, “Challenges of teaching writing to ESL learners in a Pakistani public high school: Issues, contributing factors, and solutions based on personal reflections,” Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 550–563, 2023, doi: 10.47205/plhr.2023(7-II)49.

S. Xu and Y. Jin, “Chinese adolescents’ socio-economic status and English achievement: The mediating role of parental emotional support,” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, vol. 11, art. 1504, 2024, doi: 10.1057/s41599-024-04048-4.

M. del M. García-Vita, M. Medina-García, G. P. Polo Amashta, and L. Higueras-Rodríguez, “Socio-educational factors to promote educational inclusion in higher education: A question of student achievement,” Education Sciences, vol. 11, no. 3, art. 123, 2021, doi: 10.3390/educsci11030123.

H. Anisa and A. Arifmiboy, “An analysis of factors influencing the students’ learning English achievement,” Journal of English Language and Education, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 264–269, 2021, doi: 10.31004/jele.v6i2.160.

S. Farianti, “The influence of social factors on students’ achievement in learning English,” JL3T (Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Language Teaching), vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 53–75, 2018.

C. Chairunnisa, R. Apriliaswati, and E. Rosnija, “An analysis on factors influencing students’ low English learning achievement,” Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Untan, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1–10, 2017.

V. L. Lestari, “The role of parental attention and learning motivation in increasing students’ English learning achievement,” SELTICS Journal: Scope of English Language Teaching, Literature and Linguistics, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 12–21, 2020, doi: 10.46918/seltics.v3i1.540.

L. H. Ling, C. H. Wen, and N. H. M. Lateh, “Non-Chinese students’ perception on e-learning in enhancing Chinese language skills,” International Journal of Language Education and Applied Linguistics, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 43–54, 2019, doi: 10.15282/ijleal.v9.294.

J. S. Jani and M. S. Mellinger, “Beyond ‘writing to learn’: Factors influencing students’ writing outcomes,” Journal of Social Work Education, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 136–152, 2015, doi: 10.1080/10437797.2015.977177.

A. A. Sabti, S. Md Rashid, V. Nimehchisalem, and R. Darmi, “The impact of writing anxiety, writing achievement motivation, and writing self-efficacy on writing performance: A correlational study of Iraqi tertiary EFL learners,” SAGE Open, vol. 9, no. 4, 2019, doi: 10.1177/2158244019894289.

Y. Tao and J. Yu, “Cultural threads in writing mastery: A structural analysis of perfectionism, learning self-efficacy, and motivation as mediated by self-reflection in Chinese EFL learners,” BMC Psychology, vol. 12, art. 80, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01572-5.

A. Vromen, “Qualitative methods,” in Theory and Methods in Political Science, 4th ed., V. Lowndes, D. Marsh, and G. Stoker, Eds. Palgrave Macmillan, 2018, pp. 237–253.

T. J. Young, “Questionnaires and surveys,” in Research Methods in Intercultural Communication: A Practical Guide, Z. Hua, Ed. Wiley Blackwell, 2015, pp. 163–180, doi: 10.1002/9781119166283.ch11.

Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2018.

R. Salama, F. Al-Turjman, and C. Altrjman, “Mobile application system for online surveys and questionnaires,” in 2023 International Conference on Mechatronics, IoT and Industrial Informatics (ICMIII), 2023, pp. 1–10, doi: 10.1109/ICMIII58949.2023.00006.

C. Anson and K. Cole, “Empirical studies of writing and generative AI: Introduction to the special issue,” Journal of Writing Research, vol. 17, no. 3, 2026, doi: 10.17239/jowr-2026.17.03.01.

C. Chen and Y. Gong, “The role of AI-assisted learning in academic writing: A mixed-methods study on Chinese as a second language students,” Education Sciences, vol. 15, no. 2, art. 141, 2025, doi: 10.3390/educsci15020141.

M. Usher, “Generative AI vs. instructor vs. peer assessments: A comparison of grading and feedback in higher education,” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 912–927, 2025, doi: 10.1080/02602938.2025.2487495.

R. Farzi, “Calibrating generative AI for second language writing assessment: Combining statistical validation with prompt design,” Assessment and Practice in Educational Sciences, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 1–12, 2024, doi: 10.61838/japes.2.4.1.

Y. Tiandem-Adamou, “Using generative artificial intelligence to support EFL students’ writing proficiency in university in China,” Journal of Educational Technology and Innovation, vol. 6, no. 4, 2024, doi: 10.61414/jeti.v6i4.213.

M. Farrokhnia, S. Latifi, P. M. Papadopoulos, L. Hogenkamp, H. Gijlers, H. Khosravi, and O. Noroozi, “Generative AI offers more, but students revise less: Comparing the effects of teacher and AI feedback on student essay revisions,” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 23, no. 1, art. 6, 2026.