Tangible AI in the Elementary Classroom: Effects on AI Literacy, Computational Thinking, and Learner Dispositions

Harsa Wara Prabawa; Jajang Kusnendar; Yuli Sopianti; Andhin Dyas Fitriani; Rohati

doi:10.58421/gehu.v5i5.1993

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v5i5.1993

Authors

Harsa Wara Prabawa Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Jajang Kusnendar Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Yuli Sopianti Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Andhin Dyas Fitriani Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Rohati Universitas Jambi

Keywords:

Tangible AI, AI Literacy, Embodied Cognition, TPACK, Elementary Education

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly ubiquitous, yet AI literacy remains underdeveloped in elementary education, where young learners often view AI in anthropomorphic or magical terms. This study examined changes in computational thinking (CT), AI concept mastery, learning motivation, and programming self-efficacy following a tangible AI intervention, and explored the teacher's implementation experience. Guided by a framework integrating the AI Literacy Framework and the SEAME Model, a four-week intervention (4 × 60 minutes) was implemented with 36 fifth-grade students and one teacher in a public elementary school, using a single-group pretest–posttest design within a mixed-methods approach. Quantitative data were analyzed using repeated-measures ANCOVA, with prior computing experience as a covariate; qualitative data from semi-structured teacher interviews (during and after the intervention) and observations of all four sessions were analyzed thematically. Significant pre–post gains were found for all four composite outcomes, largest for AI concept mastery (M = 8.4 to 15.1; η²p = .70) and total CT score (η²p = .56), although the CT abstraction subdimension did not improve (M = 2.3 to 2.1). Students able to explain how machine learning models learn from data rose from 28% to 83%. Anthropomorphic descriptions of AI decreased from 89% to 25% of students, with post-intervention explanations increasingly referring to sensors, data, and training. Three qualitative themes emerged: strong pedagogical confidence but limited AI content knowledge, persistent infrastructural constraints, and reduced technical anxiety through gradual mastery. Tangible AI may offer a promising bridge to early AI literacy; however, without a control group, changes cannot be causally attributed to the intervention, and these single-school findings are preliminary.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

D. Long and B. Magerko, "What is AI Literacy? Competencies and Design Considerations," in International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), 2020.

D. Touretzky, C. Gardner-McCune, F. Martin and D. Seehorn, "Envisioning AI for K-12: What Should Every Child Know about AI?," in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2020.

R. Williams, S. Ali, N. Devasia, D. DiPaola, J. Hong, S. P. Kaputsos, B. Jordan and C. Breazeal, "AI + Ethics Curricula for Middle School Youth: Lessons Learned from Three Project-Based Curricula," International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, vol. 33, 2022.

S. Druga and A. J. Ko, "How do children's perceptions of machine intelligence change when training and coding smart programs?," in IDC '21: Proceedings of the 20th Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference, 2021.

P. H. Kahn, T. Kanda, H. Ishiguro, N. G. Freier, R. L. Severson, B. T. Gill, J. H. Ruckert and S. Shen, ""Robovie, you'll have to go into the closet now": Children's social and moral relationships with a humanoid robot," Developmental Psychology, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 303-314, 2012.

A. Zimmermann-Niefield, M. Turner, B. Murphy, S. K. Kane and R. B. Shapiro, "Youth Learning Machine Learning through Building Models of Athletic Moves," in IDC '19: Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, 2019.

T. C. Bell, J. Alexander, I. Freeman and M. Grimley, "Computer Science Unplugged: school students doing real computing without computers," New Zealand Journal of Applied Computing and Information Technology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 20-29, 2009.

S. Y. Lye and J. H. L. Koh, "Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for K-12?," Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 41, 2014.

S. Druga, S. T. Vu, E. Likhith and T. Qiu, "Inclusive AI literacy for kids around the world," in FL2019: Proceedings of FabLearn 2019, 2019.

D. Petko, P. Mishra and M. J. Koehler, "TPACK in context: An updated model," Computers and Education Open, vol. 8, 2025.

A. Castro, B. Díaz, C. Aguilera, M. Prat and D. Chávez-Herting, "Identifying Rural Elementary Teachers' Perception Challenges and Opportunities in Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Teaching Practices," Sustainability, 2025.

I. H. Y. Yim, "A critical review of teaching and learning artificial intelligence (AI) literacy: Developing an intelligence-based AI literacy framework for primary school education," Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 7, 2024.

M. Yue, M. S.-Y. Jong and D. T. K. Ng, "Understanding K–12 teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge readiness and attitudes toward artificial intelligence education," Education and Information Technologies, vol. 29, 2024.

M. Przybylla and R. Romeike, "Physical Computing and its Scope - Towards a Constructionist Computer Science Curriculum with Physical Computing," Informatics in Education, vol. 13, no. 2, 2014.

H. Darabipourshiraz, M. Bhat and D. Long, "Introducing AI without computers: Hands-on literacy and ethical sense-making for young learners.," in Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing System, 2025.

A. N. Antle and A. F. Wise, "Getting down to details: Using theories of cognition and learning to inform tangible user interface design," Interacting with Computers, vol. 25, no. 1, 2013.

M. Wilson, "Six views of embodied cognition," Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol. 9, pp. 625-636, 2002.

I. Levin, A. L. Semenov and M. Gorsky, "Smart Learning in the 21st Century: Advancing Constructionism Across Three Digital Epochs," Education Sciences, vol. 15, no. 1, 2025.

K. M. Clark, "Embodied Imagination: Lakoff and Johnson's Experientialist View of Conceptual Understanding," Review of General Psychology, vol. 28, no. 2, 2024.

O. Parnafes and A. Disessa, "Relations between Types of Reasoning and Computational Representations," International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, vol. 9, 2004.

A. D. Selbst and S. Barocas, "The Intuitive Appeal of Explainable Machines," Fordham Law Review, vol. 87, no. 3, 2018.

D. T. K. Ng, J. K. L. Leung, S. K. W. Chhu and M. S. Qiao, "Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review," Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2, 2021.

S.-C. Kong, W. M.-Y. Cheung and G. Zhang, "Evaluating an Artificial Intelligence Literacy Programme for Developing University Students' Conceptual Understanding, Literacy, Empowerment and Ethical Awareness," Educational Technology & Society, 2022.

Ö. Korkmaz, R. Çakir and M. Y. Özden, "A validity and reliability study of the computational thinking scales (CTS)," Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 72, pp. 558-569, 2017.

S. M. Glynn, P. Brickman, N. Armstrong and G. Taasoobshirazi, "Science motivation questionnaire II: Validation with science majors and non-science majors," Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 48, no. 10, 2011.

M.-J. Tsai, C.-Y. Wang and P.-F. Hsu, "Developing the computer programming self-efficacy scale for higher education students," Journal of Educational Computing Research, vol. 56, no. 8, 2018.

W. R. Shadish, T. D. Cook and D. T. Campbell, Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference, Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2002.

L. A. Palinkas, S. M. Horwitz, C. A. Green, J. P. Wisdom, N. Duan and K. Hoagwood, "Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research," Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, vol. 42, 2015.

S. Lee and D. K. Lee, "What is the proper way to apply the multiple comparison test?," Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, vol. 71, no. 5, 2018.

H. Kang, "Sample Size Determination and Power Analysis Using the G*Power Software," Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, vol. 18, 2021.

V. Braun and V. Clarke, "Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology," Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3, no. 2, 2008.

M. Sidji, W. Smith and M. J. Rogerson, "Adopting the Theory of Distributed Cognition for Human-AI Cooperation," in OzCHI '24: Proceedings of the 36th Australasian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 2024.

S. Suh, "Using Concreteness Fading to Model & Design Learning Process," in ICER '19: Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research, 2019.

A. Lindner and M. Berges, "Can you explain AI to me? Teachers' pre-concepts about artificial intelligence," in 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Sweden, 2020.