Reading for Pleasure in Formal Education: A Narrative Review of Pedagogical Practices, Opportunities, and Constraints

Meinia Prasyesti Kurniasari; Arya Wijaya Pramodha Wardhana; Nor Erlissa Abd Aziz; Masiyyana Charumatul Arofah; Ari Ati Putri Muharani

doi:10.58421/gehu.v5i5.1921

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v5i5.1921

Authors

Meinia Prasyesti Kurniasari Universitas Airlangga https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0798-5263
Arya Wijaya Pramodha Wardhana Universitas Airlangga https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7189-5978
Nor Erlissa Abd Aziz University Teknologi Mara, Malaysia
Masiyyana Charumatul Arofah Universitas Airlangga https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4788-308X
Ari Ati Putri Muharani Universitas Airlangga

Keywords:

formal education, literacy, reading for pleasure, reading pedagogy, school libraries

Abstract

Reading for Pleasure (RfP) is associated with literacy development and reading enjoyment, yet formal education can turn reading into an assessment-driven obligation. This narrative review examines how formal education conceptualizes RfP and how it relates to reading pedagogy. Ten peer-reviewed studies published between 2014 and 2024 were identified through Scopus and Google Scholar and synthesized thematically. The corpus spans school and university contexts in the United States, Australia, Ghana, Nigeria, Spain, Indonesia, and the United Kingdom, as well as non-site-specific conceptual and practice-design analyses. Across the studies, RfP is best understood as a continuum from externally required reading through supported choice and developing enjoyment to more autonomous reading. Meaningful text choice, multimodal and personalized activities, social and private reading opportunities, learner participation, and supportive classroom and library environments emerge as promising approaches, although the heterogeneous evidence does not support uniform causal claims. Teachers and librarians help preserve access, choice, and low-stakes participation, while institutional support can sustain the conditions needed for reader autonomy. RfP can be integrated into formal education when pedagogical structure protects voluntariness and enjoyment. Longitudinal and mixed-method research is needed to assess whether RfP initiatives in formal education produce sustained voluntary reading beyond intervention periods.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

I. V. S. Mullis, M. von Davier, P. Foy, B. Fishbein, K. A. Reynolds, and E. Wry, PIRLS 2021 International Results in Reading. Boston College, TIMSS and PIRLS International Study Center, 2023. doi: 10.6017/lse.tpisc.tr2103.kb5342.

J. Jerrim and G. Moss, “The link between fiction and teenagers’ reading skills: International evidence from the OECD PISA study,” British Educational Research Journal, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 181–200, 2019, doi: 10.1002/berj.3498.

U. Wafa, “Survei GoodStats: Baru 1 dari 5 orang yang rutin baca buku setiap hari,” GoodStats, Feb. 13, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://data.goodstats.id/statistic/survei-goodstats-baru-1-dari-5-orang-yang-rutin-baca-buku-setiap-hari-pxSPf

A. T. Barber and S. L. Klauda, “How reading motivation and engagement enable reading achievement: Policy implications,” Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 27–34, 2020, doi: 10.1177/2372732219893385.

T. Cremin and L. Scholes, “Reading for pleasure: Scrutinising the evidence base—Benefits, tensions and recommendations,” Language and Education, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 537–559, 2024, doi: 10.1080/09500782.2024.2324948.

R. Alexander, Essays on Pedagogy, 1st ed. Routledge, 2008. doi: 10.4324/9780203609309.

H. Hendry, T. Cremin, and A. Harrison, “Developing pre-service teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for reading for pleasure: What is missing? What next?” Education Sciences, vol. 15, no. 5, Art. no. 588, 2025, doi: 10.3390/educsci15050588.

J. Farrar and A. Simpson, “Pre-service teacher knowledge of children’s literature and attitudes to reading for pleasure: An international comparative study,” Literacy, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 216–227, 2024, doi: 10.1111/lit.12360.

K. N. Sa’diah and H. P. Yuwinanto, “Hubungan perilaku membaca reading for pleasure dan tingkat empati di kalangan pembaca komik fiksi digital LINE WEBTOON,” Palimpsest: Jurnal Ilmu Informasi dan Perpustakaan, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 18–38, 2023, doi: 10.20473/pjil.v14i1.46345.

International Literacy Association, “The case for children’s rights to read,” 2018. [Online]. Available: https://literacyworldwide.org/docs/default-source/resource-documents/the-case-for-childrens-rights-to-read.pdf

J. Alexander and R. Jarman, “The pleasures of reading non-fiction,” Literacy, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 78–85, 2018, doi: 10.1111/lit.12152.

M. Elen, E. D’Heer, M. Geuens, and I. Vermeir, “The influence of mood on attitude–behavior consistency,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 66, no. 7, pp. 917–923, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.12.011.

J. R. Zadra and G. L. Clore, “Emotion and perception: The role of affective information,” WIREs Cognitive Science, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 676–685, 2011, doi: 10.1002/wcs.147.

V. Howard, “The importance of pleasure reading in the lives of young teens: Self-identification, self-construction and self-awareness,” Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 46–55, 2011, doi: 10.1177/0961000610390992.

V. A. Vogrinčič Čepič, T. Mascia, and J.-A. Aerila, “Reading for pleasure: A review of current research,” New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 49–71, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s40841-024-00313-x.

N. Kucirkova and T. Cremin, “Personalised reading for pleasure with digital libraries: Towards a pedagogy of practice and design,” Cambridge Journal of Education, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 571–589, 2018, doi: 10.1080/0305764X.2017.1375458.

J. W. Knopf, “Doing a literature review,” PS: Political Science & Politics, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 127–132, 2006, doi: 10.1017/S1049096506060264.

E. Ro and C. L. A. Chen, “Pleasure reading behavior and attitude of non-academic ESL students: A replication study,” Reading in a Foreign Language, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 49–72, 2014. [Online]. Available: http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl

R. K. Kavi, S. N. B. Tackie, and K. A. Bugyei, “Reading for pleasure among junior high school students: Case study of the Saint Andrew’s Anglican Complex Junior High School, Sekondi,” Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), Art. no. 1234, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1234

M. K. Merga and C. Ferguson, “School librarians supporting students’ reading for pleasure: A job description analysis,” Australian Journal of Education, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 153–172, 2021, doi: 10.1177/0004944121991275.

M. O. Abimbola, I. Shabi, and K. A. Aramide, “Pressured or pleasure reading: A survey of reading preferences of secondary school students during COVID-19 lockdown,” International Journal of Knowledge Content Development & Technology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 7–21, 2021, doi: 10.5865/IJKCT.2021.11.2.007.

S. M. Chireac, E. Morón Olivares, and A. Devís Arbona, “The impact of reading for pleasure: Examining the role of videos as a tool for improving reading comprehension,” TEM Journal, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 225–233, 2022, doi: 10.18421/TEM111-28.

F. Rola, E. Faridah, E. Surya, and N. Bukit, “Peran persepsi siswa terhadap instruksi langsung dan umpan balik yang diberikan guru terhadap kesenangan siswa dalam membaca,” Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, Psikologi dan Kesehatan (J-P3K), vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 298–306, 2023, doi: 10.51849/j-p3k.v4i3.230.

A. Ulivia, F. Fatihul Alwan, and T. Hayati Dahlan, “More than somebody’s pleasure: The analysis of reading for pleasure in education using cognitive psychology perspective,” International Journal of Applied Educational Research, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2023, doi: 10.59890/ijaer.v1i1.430.

E. Oxley and S. McGeown, “Reading for pleasure practices in school: Children’s perspectives and experiences,” Educational Research, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 375–391, 2023, doi: 10.1080/00131881.2023.2236123.

D. Afnitasari and M. M. Maharani, “Reading for pleasure: Exploring female students’ motivation in reading stories,” Jurnal Ilmiah Sultan Agung, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 284–297, 2024.

J. D. Wilhelm, “Recognising the power of pleasure: What engaged adolescent readers get from their free-choice reading, and how teachers can leverage this for all,” Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 30–41, 2016.

K. Price and A. Simpson, “‘You learn so much from reading for pleasure’: Exploring a reading for pleasure pedagogy impact on pre-service teachers’ literate identities,” Education Sciences, vol. 15, no. 1, Art. no. 7, 2025, doi: 10.3390/educsci15010007.

T. Cremin, S. Mukherjee, J.-A. Aerila, M. Kauppinen, J. Lähteelä, and M. Siipola, “Widening teachers’ reading repertoires: Moving beyond a popular childhood canon,” The Reading Teacher, vol. 77, no. 6, pp. 833–841, 2024, doi: 10.1002/trtr.2294.

L. McKnight, “Sponsors of pleasure: Wide reading re-imagined through social curation,” Changing English, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 300–311, 2018, doi: 10.1080/1358684X.2018.1460581.

A. Reedy and R. de Carvalho, “Children’s perspectives on reading, agency and their environment: What can we learn about reading for pleasure from an East London primary school?” Education 3–13, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 134–147, 2021, doi: 10.1080/03004279.2019.1701514.