From School Performance to TikTok Trend: Audience Reception and the Recontextualization of Tari Semut
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v5i5.1918Keywords:
Audience reception, Commodification of childhood, Netnography, Tari Semut, TikTokAbstract
In mid-2026, a school extracurricular routine called Tari Semut (Ant Dance), originally designed to model cooperative insect-colony movement for children, went viral on TikTok and was quickly absorbed into adult creator culture far removed from its classroom origin. The original upload gathered roughly 6.7 million likes, 5.4 million shares, and 68,300 comments within days, before the accompanying audio spread to public figures and ordinary users across Indonesia and Thailand. This paper does not claim to be a full netnography. It is an exploratory qualitative reading of a modest dataset, six purposively sampled videos and 18 coded top-level comments, analyzed by a single coder, and the findings should be read as patterns within that dataset rather than as a general account of TikTok discourse on the trend. No statement from the choreographer or the school confirmed the dance's pedagogical intent; that absence is treated here as a limitation, not a settled fact. Using Stuart Hall's encoding/decoding model followed by inductive thematic coding, the analysis asked how far audience comments registered, or ignored, the dance's educational origin and its subsequent commodification. Dominant readings that flattened the dance into comedic or aesthetic content were the most common response overall. Oppositional readings criticizing the commodification of children's movement, by contrast, surfaced only in videos featuring the original student performers and were absent altogether from adult public-figure versions. Together these patterns suggest an escalating commodification trajectory and unsettle the dance's framing as an established tradition, pointing instead toward a case of invented tradition.
Downloads
References
J. Zeng, C. Abidin, And M. S. Schäfer, “Research Perspectives On Tiktok And Its Legacy Apps Introduction,” International Journal Of Communication, Vol. 15, Pp. 3161–3172, 2021.
H. Boke Et Al., “Effects Of Cooperative Learning On Students’ Learning Outcomes In Physical Education: A Meta-Analysis,” Frontiers In Psychology, Vol. 16, No. May, Pp. 1–23, 2025, Doi: 10.3389/Fpsyg.2025.1508808.
L. Mullany And P. Stockwell, Qualitative, Quantitative And Mixed Methods Research (Dörnyei). 2021. Doi: 10.4324/9781315707181-60.
N. N. L. I. Devi, E. N. Dharmayukti, K. A. Williyanto, And A. Yudiarso, “Tiktok: Melestarikan Seni Pertunjukan Tradisional Melalui Digitalisasi Layar Vertikal,” In Prosiding Pekan Ilmiah Pelajar (Pilar), 2025.
D. Today, “Tren Tari Semut Goyang Tiktok, Sound Sakedungkeding Viral Ditonton Jutaan Kali.” 2026. [Online]. Available: Https://Www.Depoktoday.Id/Tren-Tari-Semut-Sound-Sakedungkeding-Viral-Tiktok
G. Stevens, V. L. O’donnell, And L. Williams, “Public Domain Or Private Data? Developing An Ethical Approach To Social Media Research In An Inter-Disciplinary Project,” Educational Research And Evaluation, Vol. 21, No. 2, Pp. 154–167, 2015, Doi: 10.1080/13803611.2015.1024010.
C. Abidin, “#Familygoals: Family Influencers, Calibrated Amateurism, And Justifying Young Digital Labor,” Social Media + Society, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2017, Doi: 10.1177/2056305117707191.
G. Flinterud, “‘Folk’ In The Age Of Algorithms: Theorizing Folklore On Social Media Platforms,” Folklore, Vol. 134, No. 4, Pp. 439–461, 2023, DOI: 10.1080/0015587x.2023.2233839.
E. Hobsbawm And T. Ranger, The Invention Of Tradition. Cambridge University Press, 1983.
E. O’leary, “Irish Dance And Identity Politics On Tiktok,” Irish Studies Review, Vol. 32, No. 2, Pp. 246–261, 2024, Doi: 10.1080/09670882.2024.2339431.
M. Betlemidze, “Jalaiah Effect: A Story Of A Stolen Dance On Tiktok And Trans-Platformization Of Ignorance,” Social Media + Society, 2025, Doi: 10.1177/20563051251317765.
Z. Taylor, “Algorithms, Affordances And The Ambiguity Of Credit On Tiktok,” Continuum, Vol. 40, No. 2, Pp. 280–293, 2026, Doi: 10.1080/10304312.2025.2518971.
Putri, “Digital Literacy And Cultural Expression: How Tiktok Reimagines Traditional Dance,” International Journal Of Multicultural And Multireligious Understanding, Vol. 12, No. 11, 2025, Doi: 10.18415/Ijmmu.V12i11.7138.
S. Hall, D. Hobson, A. Lowe, And P. Willis, Culture, Media, Language. Routledge, 1980. Doi: 10.4324/9780203381182.
D. Song, “Hall’s Encoding/Decoding Model Revisited In The Digital Platform Age: De/Encoding, Lincoding, Affordecoding, And En/Decoding,” Information, Communication & Society, Vol. 29, No. 2, Pp. 546–564, 2025, DOI: 10.1080/1369118x.2025.2524571.
Y. C. Zhang Et Al., “Career-Specific Parenting Practices And Career Decision-Making Self-Efficacy Among Chinese Adolescents: The Interactive Effects Of Parenting Practices And The Mediating Role Of Autonomy,” Frontiers In Psychology, Vol. 10, No. Feb., Pp. 1–10, 2019, DOI: 10.3389/Fpsyg.2019.00363.
R. Robertson, “Glocalization: Time-Space And Homogeneity-Heterogeneity,” In Global Modernities, M. Featherstone, S. Lash, And R. Robertson, Eds., Sage, 1995, Pp. 25–44.
R. V. Kozinets And U. Gretzel, “Qualitative Social Media Methods: Netnography In The Age Of Technocultures,” In The Sage Handbook Of Qualitative Research, 6th Ed., N. K. Denzin And Y. S. Lincoln, Eds., Sage, 2023, Pp. 403–420.
Y. C. Zhang Et Al., “Career-Specific Parenting Practices And Career Decision-Making Self-Efficacy Among Chinese Adolescents: The Interactive Effects Of Parenting Practices And The Mediating Role Of Autonomy,” Frontiers In Psychology, Vol. 10, No. Feb., Pp. 1–10, 2019, DOI: 10.3389/Fpsyg.2019.00363.
R. V. Kozinets, Netnography: The Essential Guide To Qualitative Social Media Research, 3rd Ed. Sage, 2020.
A. Bhandari And S. Bimo, “Why is Everyone On TikTok Now? The Algorithmized Self And The Future Of Self-Making On Social Media,” Social Media + Society, Vol. 8, No. 1, Pp. 1–11, 2022, DOI: 10.1177/20563051221086241.
A. Vizcaíno-Verdú And D. Jaramillo-Dent, “(Re)Coding TikTok: The Memetic Interactivity Codebook For Content Analysis,” Cultural Science Journal, Vol. 15, No. 1, Pp. 63–81, 2023.
I. D. N. Times, “Asal Usul Sound Sakedungkeding Yang Jadi Pengiring Tari Semut Viral.” 2026. [Online]. Available: Https://Www.Idntimes.Com/Hype/Entertainment/Asal-Usul-Sound-Sakedungkeding-Yang-Jadi-Pengiring-Tari-Semut-Viral-00-6x7yf-7xngjy
A. N. Fathimah, “Audience Encoding-Decoding Analysis in TikTok’s Dark Romance Content,” Elite Journal: International Journal Of Education, Language And Literature, Vol. 5, No. 4, Pp. 18–31, 2025, DOI: 10.26740/Elitejournal.V5n4.P18-31.
V. Braun And V. Clarke, “Using Thematic Analysis In Psychology,” Qualitative Research In Psychology, Vol. 3, No. 2, Pp. 77–101, 2006, DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
H. Boke Et Al., “Effects Of Cooperative Learning On Students’ Learning Outcomes In Physical Education: A Meta-Analysis,” Frontiers In Psychology, Vol. 16, Pp. 1–23, 2025, Doi: 10.3389/Fpsyg.2025.1508808.
Y. Yan And S. Wu, “Auditing Algorithmic Personalization In Tiktok Comment Sections,” Proceedings Of The International Aaai Conference On Web And Social Media (Icwsm), 2026, [Online]. Available: Https://Arxiv.Org/Abs/2603.25061
M. Walrave, S. Robbé, L. Staes, And L. Hallam, “Mindful Sharenting: How Millennial Parents Balance Between Sharing And Protecting,” Frontiers In Psychology, Vol. 14, P. 1171611, 2023, DOI: 10.3389/Fpsyg.2023.1171611.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of General Education and Humanities

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

















