Students' Perceptions of ChatGPT Utilization in Educational Economics Learning: A Descriptive Study in Higher Education

Aminah Ramalia; Ahmad Rifki; Florante P Ibarra

doi:10.58421/gehu.v5i5.1906

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v5i5.1906

Authors

Aminah Ramalia Universitas Jambi
Ahmad Rifki Universitas Jambi
Florante P Ibarra Central Luzon State University

Keywords:

ChatGPT, Generative AI, Economic Education, Student Engagement, Learning Optimization

Abstract

The growing use of generative artificial intelligence, particularly ChatGPT, has created new opportunities and challenges for higher education. This study examines students' perceptions of ChatGPT utilization in Educational Economics learning at Universitas Jambi, Indonesia. A descriptive cross-sectional survey was conducted among 78 students in the Economic Education Study Program who took the Educational Economics course during the 2025/2026 academic year. Using total sampling, data were collected through a 16-item, four-point Likert-scale questionnaire covering five dimensions: ease of use, knowledge, satisfaction, motivation, and activity. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics based on mean scores and predetermined categories. The findings indicate generally positive student perceptions across all five dimensions. Ease of use received the highest mean score (M = 3.12), followed by knowledge (M = 3.02), satisfaction (M = 2.94), motivation (M = 2.83), and activity (M = 2.81). Students perceived ChatGPT as accessible and helpful for understanding course materials and obtaining rapid responses. However, perceptions were comparatively lower regarding response accuracy, critical thinking, and motivation for academic writing. These findings suggest that students perceive ChatGPT as a potentially valuable complementary learning resource, while recognizing its limitations for higher-order learning activities. Appropriate pedagogical guidance is therefore needed to encourage critical evaluation of AI-generated information, independent learning, and responsible use of ChatGPT in Educational Economics learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

M. Bearman, P. Dawson, S. Bennett, M. Hall, E. Molloy, D. Boud, and G. Joughin, "How University Teachers Design Assessments: A Cross-Disciplinary Study," High. Educ., vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 49–64, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s10734-016-0077-8.

V. N. Oriakhi, O. M. Esegbona-Isikeh, B. Esseme, A. Claude, D. Emakporuena, A. C. Nwanakwaugwu, and U. O. Matthew, "Generative Artificial Intelligence in Education: ChatGPT-4 Experiences to Anticipated ChatGPT-5," HAFED POLY J. Sci. Manag. Technol., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 149–169, 2024.

S. C. Tan, C. Chan, K. Bielaczyc, L. Ma, M. Scardamalia, and C. Bereiter, "Knowledge building: Aligning education with needs for knowledge creation in the digital age," Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 2243–2266, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11423-021-10006-x.

K. Mustapa, Y. B. M. Gagaramusu, E. H. Palandi, A. W. Syakhrani, and H. Towpek, "Technology-Enhanced Education: Nurturing the Digital Generation—Experiences in Islamic Schools in Indonesia," Int. J. Teach. Learn., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 16–40, 2023.

S. Luckyardi, S. Munawaroh, A. Abduh, R. Rosmaladewi, A. Hufad, and N. Haristiani, "Advancing Language Education in Indonesia: Integrating Technology and Innovations," ASEAN J. Sci. Eng., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 583–612, 2024, doi: 10.17509/ajse.v4i3.71534.

A. Habibi, Muhaimin, B. K. Danibao, Y. G. Wibowo, S. Wahyuni, and A. Octavia, "ChatGPT in higher education learning: Acceptance and use," Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 5, Art. no. 100190, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100190

C. K. Y. Chan and W. Hu, "Students' voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education," International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 20, Art. no. 43, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8.

J.-M. Romero-Rodríguez, M.-S. Ramírez-Montoya, M. Buenestado-Fernández, and F. Lara-Lara, "Use of ChatGPT at university as a tool for complex thinking: Students' perceived usefulness," Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, vol. 12, pp. 323–339, 2023, doi: 10.7821/naer.2023.7.1458.

H. Johnston, R. F. Wells, E. M. Shanks, T. Boey, and B. N. Parsons, "Student perspectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence technologies in higher education," International Journal for Educational Integrity, vol. 20, Art. no. 2, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s40979-024-00149-4.

D. Baidoo-Anu, D. Asamoah, I. Amoako, and I. Mahama, "Exploring student perspectives on generative artificial intelligence in higher education learning," Discover Education, vol. 3, Art. no. 98, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s44217-024-00173-z.

F. D. Davis, "Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology," MIS Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319–340, 1989.

L. S. Vygotsky, Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press, 1978.

R. M. Ryan and E. L. Deci, "Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being," Am. Psychol., vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 68–78, 2000, doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68.

A. W. Astin, "Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education," in College Student Development and Academic Life. New York, NY, USA: Routledge, 2014, pp. 251–262.

T. Mairisiska and N. Qadariah, “Persepsi mahasiswa FTIK IAIN Kerinci terhadap penggunaan ChatGPT untuk mendukung pembelajaran di era digital,” Jurnal Teknologi Pembelajaran Indonesia, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 107–124, 2023.

E. Kasneci et al., "ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education," Learning and Individual Differences, vol. 103, Art. no. 102274, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274.

F. D. Davis, "Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology," MIS Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319–340, 1989.

UNESCO, Guidance for Generative AI in Education and Research. Paris, France: UNESCO, 2023.

L. S. Vygotsky, Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press, 1978.

M. Farrokhnia, S. K. Banihashem, O. Noroozi, and A. Wals, "A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research," Innovations in Education and Teaching International, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 460–474, 2024.

C. K. Lo, "What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature," Education Sciences, vol. 13, no. 4, Art. no. 410, 2023, doi: 10.3390/educsci13040410.

UNESCO, Guidance for Generative AI in Education and Research. Paris, France: UNESCO, 2023.

O. Zawacki-Richter, V. I. Marín, M. Bond, and F. Gouverneur, "Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education—Where are the educators?" International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 16, Art. no. 39, 2019, doi: 10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0.