The Impact of Hungarian Anti-Immigrant Policies on the Decline of Refugee Inflows 2015–2020

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v5i5.1740

Authors

  • Eka Nurdiansyah Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
  • Ali Maksum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
  • Mohammad Reevany Bustami University of Science Malaysia
  • Dina Suhaimi University of Science Malaysia

Keywords:

Anti-Immigrant Policy, Hungary, Refugee Crisis, Migration Governance, Securitization

Abstract

The 2015 European refugee crisis created significant political, economic, and social challenges for European Union member states, prompting Hungary to adopt restrictive anti-immigrant policies to control refugee inflows. While previous studies have examined Hungary’s anti-immigrant discourse and the broader refugee crisis, limited attention has been given to the effectiveness of these policies in reducing refugee arrivals through an integrated perspective of securitization, populism, and public policy. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the impact of Hungary’s anti-immigrant policies on the reduction of the refugee crisis between 2015 and 2020. This research employed a qualitative descriptive design using a library research approach. Secondary data were collected from books, peer-reviewed journal articles, official reports, and relevant online publications and analyzed through qualitative descriptive analysis. The findings indicate that stricter asylum regulations, reinforced border security, and anti-immigrant political campaigns significantly reduced refugee inflows while strengthening public support for the government’s security-oriented migration policies. The study concludes that Hungary’s anti-immigrant policies effectively reduced refugee arrivals by combining restrictive migration governance with securitization strategies. These findings contribute to migration governance literature by demonstrating how security narratives and populist politics shape immigration policy outcomes and provide practical insights for policymakers facing large-scale migration crises.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

D. A. Ritiauw, “States Interests and the Politics of Migration,” Nation State J. Int. Stud., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 18–31, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.24076/nsjis.v5i1.754.

E. Soboleva, “International Migration Framing in the Global Times (2012–2022): Constructing Identity Narrative About the Self and the Other,” J. Curr. Chinese Aff., vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 25–47, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1177/18681026241242489.

A. Hajro, D. V. Caprar, J. Zikic, and G. K. Stahl, “Global migrants: Understanding the implications for international business and management,” J. World Bus., vol. 56, no. 2, p. 101192, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2021.101192.

A. Moridian, M. Radulescu, P. Kumar, M. T. Radu, and J. Mohammad, “New insights on immigration, fiscal policy and unemployment rate in EU countries – A quantile regression approach,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 13, p. e33519, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33519.

D. Rauhut and A. Humer, “EU Cohesion Policy and spatial economic growth: trajectories in economic thought,” Eur. Plan. Stud., vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 2116–2133, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1080/09654313.2019.1709416.

M. S. Alam and M. S. Islam, “Borders, Disputes, and Migration: Territorial Conflicts and South & Southeast Asian Mobility,” 2025, pp. 1–15. doi: 10.1007/978-981-99-8001-7_9-1.

S. Baroud and E. Atar, “Humanitarian Aid and Geopolitical Conflict: The Migration Realities in the Syrian Case,” 2025, pp. 1–27. doi: 10.1007/978-981-99-8001-7_108-1.

O. Oliinyk, Y. Bilan, H. Mishchuk, O. Akimov, and L. Vasa, “The Impact of Migration of Highly Skilled Workers on The Country’s Competitiveness and Economic Growth,” Montenegrin J. Econ., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 7–19, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.14254/1800-5845/2021.17-3.1.

Zairani and Pazli, “Motivasi jerman menerima pengungsi asal timur tengah tahun 2015,” J. Online Mhs. Bid. Ilmu Sos. dan Ilmu Polit., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1–15, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://jom.unri.ac.id/index.php/JOMFSIP/article/view/10678

M. Neureiter and F. Schulte, “A tale of two logics: how solidarity and threat perceptions shape immigrant attitudes towards immigration in Western Europe,” West Eur. Polit., vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 280–302, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1080/01402382.2022.2143162.

E. S. Lee, “A theory of migration,” Demography, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 47–57, Mar. 1966, doi: 10.2307/2060063.

F. Rashnopour, M. Bahramnejad, A. B. Alalm, and B. A. Adelfar, “Investigation of Three Migration Periods of Roman Elites in the Formation and Survival of the Jundishapur Scientific Center Applying the Theory of migration by Everett S. Lee,” Iran. J. Med. Ethics Hist. Med., no. 11, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.18502/ijme.v15i11.11817.

M. Almustafa, “Reframing refugee crisis: A ‘European crisis of migration’ or a ‘crisis of protection’?,” Environ. Plan. C Polit. Sp., vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 1064–1082, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1177/2399654421989705.

M. M. H. Ahmed, “Multiculturalism in Germany: between integration and assimilation – voices of Syrian migrants,” Rev. Econ. Polit. Sci., pp. 1–19, Apr. 2026, doi: 10.1108/REPS-04-2025-0039.

Y. Erden and S. Ozcurumez, “Mass migration governance and openness toward refugees: Comparing Germany and Turkey,” Int. Migr., vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 303–318, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1111/imig.13227.

C. Panzaru and L. Harding, “How Transit Countries Become Refugee Destinations: Insights From Central and Eastern Europe,” Int. Migr., vol. 63, no. 4, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.1111/imig.70066.

L. Grinin and A. Korotayev, “The Arab Spring: Causes, Conditions, and Driving Forces,” 2022, pp. 595–624. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-86468-2_23.

A. Sahide, B. Cipto, S. Muti’ah Setiawati, and S. Hadi, “The Arab Spring: Membaca Kronologi dan Faktornya Penyebabnya,” J. Hub. Int., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 118–129, 2015, doi: 10.18196/hi.2015.0072.118-129.

D. W. Bromley, “The confusions of democracy: The Arab spring and beyond,” World Dev., vol. 158, p. 105995, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.105995.

F. Cavatorta and J. A. Clark, “Political and social mobilization in the Middle East and North Africa after the 2011 uprisings,” Globalizations, pp. 1–14, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1080/14747731.2021.2012910.

P. R. Center, “Number of Refugees to Europe Surges to Record 1.3 Million in 2015.” [Online]. Available: https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2016/08/02/number-of-refugees-to-europe-surges-to-record-1-3-million-in-2015/

K. Emmanouilidis and S. Bellos, “Refugee flows and the economic-security nexus in Europe: evidence from military spending, growth, and political stability,” J. Contemp. Eur. Stud., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 219–251, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.1080/14782804.2025.2592054.

L. Peters, P.-J. Engelen, and D. Cassimon, “Explaining refugee flows. Understanding the 2015 European refugee crisis through a real options lens,” PLoS One, vol. 18, no. 4, p. e0284390, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284390.

S. Salsabila, “Reorientasi Kebijakan Migrasi Terbuka dalam Sistem Negara Kesejahteraan Swedia pada Masa Krisis Migran Eropa Tahun 2015,” J. Anal. Hub. Int., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 357–376, 2018.

G. Bőgel, J. Brzozowski, K. Czerska-Shaw, L. Mátyás, and K. Tausz, “Refugees: Economic Costs and Eventual Benefits,” 2024, pp. 241–291. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-61561-0_8.

T. Gessler, G. Tóth, and J. Wachs, “No Country for Asylum Seekers? How Short-Term Exposure to Refugees Influences Attitudes and Voting Behavior in Hungary,” Polit. Behav., vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 1813–1841, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11109-021-09682-1.

C. Mudde, “Did the ‘Refugee Crisis’ Transform European Politics?,” in Rechtspopulismus in Deutschland, Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2022, pp. 37–54. doi: 10.1007/978-3-658-33787-2_3.

E. Dück, “Diplomacy and Foreign Policy in the Digital Era: A Case Study of the 2015 ‘Refugee Crisis’ in Germany,” in The Palgrave Handbook of Diplomatic Thought and Practice in the Digital Age, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023, pp. 413–433. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-28214-0_19.

E. N. Ota and C. S. Ecoma, “Power and National Interest in International Relations,” Eur. J. Humanit. Soc. Sci., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 23–30, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.24018/ejsocial.2022.2.4.268.

P. Reményi, V. Glied, and N. Pap, “Good and Bad migrants in Hungary. The populist story and the reality in Hungarian migration policy,” Probl. Polityki Społecznej Stud. i Dyskusje, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 323–344, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.31971/pps/162003.

S. Khannaev, “Monetary policy and bank performance in times of crisis: evidence from Uzbekistan during COVID-19 and the Russia–Ukraine war,” Cogent Econ. Financ., vol. 14, no. 1, Dec. 2026, doi: 10.1080/23322039.2026.2650864.

OECD, “OECD Economic Surveys: Hungary 2016,” Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. [Online]. Available: https://www.oecd.org/en.html

M. Sanchez-Mazas and L. Licata, “Xenophobia: Social Psychological Aspects,” in International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, Elsevier, 2015, pp. 802–807. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.24031-2.

B. Simonovits, “The Public Perception of the Migration Crisis from the Hungarian Point of View: Evidence from the Field,” 2020, pp. 155–176. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-25666-1_8.

I. Barna and J. Koltai, “Attitude Changes towards Immigrants in the Turbulent Years of the ‘Migrant Crisis’ and Anti-Immigrant Campaign in Hungary,” Intersections, vol. 5, no. 1, May 2019, doi: 10.17356/ieejsp.v5i1.501.

A. Juhász, C. Molnár, and E. Zgut, Refugees, Asylum and Migration Issues in Hungary. Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.boell.de/sites/default/files/refugees_asylum_migration_issues_in_hungury.pdf

I. Zakariás, M. Feischmidt, M. Gerő, A. Morauszki, V. Zentai, and C. Zsigmond, “Solidarity with Displaced People from Ukraine in Hungary: Attitudes and Practices,” J. Int. Migr. Integr., Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s12134-023-01096-8.

B. W. Furidha, “Comprehension of the descriptive qualitative research method: a critical assessment of the literature,” J. Multidiscip. Res., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 1–8, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.56943/jmr.v2i4.443.

Y. Ikbar, Metodologi & Teori Hubungan Internasional, 1st ed. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama, 2014.

U. E. Chigbu, S. O. Atiku, and C. C. Du Plessis, “The Science of Literature Reviews: Searching, Identifying, Selecting, and Synthesising,” Publications, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 2, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.3390/publications11010002.

A. Kallius, D. Monterescu, and P. K. Rajaram, “Immobilizing mobility: Border ethnography, illiberal democracy, and the politics of the ‘refugee crisis’ in Hungary,” Am. Ethnol., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 25–37, Feb. 2016, doi: 10.1111/amet.12260.

B. Nagy, “Hungarian Asylum Law and Policy in 2015–2016: Securitization Instead of Loyal Cooperation in: Special Issue Constitutional Dimensions of the Refugee Crisis,” Ger. Law J., vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 1033–1082, Nov. 2016.

H. Segarra, “Dismantling the reception of asylum seekers: Hungary’s illiberal asylum policies and EU responses,” East Eur. Polit., vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 43–63, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1080/21599165.2023.2180732.

L. Balogh, I. Halász, and A. L. Pap, “Minority Rights, Minority Protection, and Diaspora Policy in Hungary, 2010–2018,” 2025, pp. 57–72. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-70451-2_4.

R. Sata, “Performing crisis to create your enemy: Europe vs. the EU in Hungarian populist discourse,” Front. Polit. Sci., vol. 5, May 2023, doi: 10.3389/fpos.2023.1032470.

D. Szabolcs, “Gyűlölethadjáratot indított a Fidesz a menekültek ellen,” index.

A. Czyż, “Hungary and Poland facing the migration crisis,” Probl. Polityki Społecznej Stud. i Dyskusje, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 289–303, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.31971/pps/159025.

Z. Kapelner, “Anti-immigrant backlash: the Democratic Dilemma for immigration policy,” Comp. Migr. Stud., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 12, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1186/s40878-024-00370-7.

D. Karas, “Financialization and state capitalism in Hungary after the Global Financial Crisis,” Compet. Chang., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 29–52, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1177/10245294211003274.

R. Øjvind Nielsen, A. Pettrachin, V. Pina, L. Torres, J. Nemec, and D. Špaček, “The role of legitimacy in robust crisis governance. Examining the failed European response to the turbulence of the 2015-16 refugee crisis,” Public Policy Adm., Feb. 2026, doi: 10.1177/09520767261428316.

S. Illés, Á. Kincses, and P. Simonyi, “From fluid migration to stable circular migration: A case study from Hungary,” Acta Geogr. Slov., vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 21–36, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.3986/AGS.9537.

D. Gyollai, “Bridging Copenhagen and Paris: how Hungarian police accept anti-immigrant discourse,” Eur. Secur., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 597–616, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1080/09662839.2021.2019021.

E. M. Goździak, “Contesting Flexible Solidarity: Secular and Religious Support for Refugees in Hungary,” 2023, pp. 21–44. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-23379-1_2.

A. Bíró-Nagy, “Orbán’s political jackpot: migration and the Hungarian electorate,” J. Ethn. Migr. Stud., vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 405–424, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2020.1853905.

Aljazeera, “Hungarian PM: We don’t want more Muslims,” AL Jazeera. [Online]. Available: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2015/9/4/hungarian-pm-we-dont-want-more-muslims

P. A. O’Hara, “Terrorism and the War on Terrorism,” 2022, pp. 307–328. doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-4158-0_10.

S. G. Prakoso, A. P. Murtyantoro, M. P. I. Cahyani, and F. A. Al Putra, “Relation between the Winning of Fidesz Party with the Number of Incoming Asylum Seekers in Hungary,” JRP (Jurnal Rev. Polit., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 26–43, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.15642/jrp.2023.13.1.26-43.

E. Peker, “Finding Religion: Immigration and the Populist (Re)Discovery of Christian Heritage in Western and Northern Europe,” Religions, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 158, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.3390/rel13020158.

N. Pap and V. Glied, “The Hungarian Border Barrier and Islam,” J. Muslims Eur., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 104–131, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.1163/22117954-12341339.

I. Zakariás and M. Feischmidt, “‘We Are That In-Between Nation’: Discourses of Deservingness of Hungarian Migrants Working in Institutions of Refugee Accommodation in Germany,” Sociology, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 400–420, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1177/0038038520941690.

B. Buzan, O. Wæver, and J. de Wilde, Security: A new framework for analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1998.

I. Szalma and B. Herke, “Interconnections between anti-immigration and pronatalist family policy discourse in Hungary,” Eur. Soc., pp. 1–27, Nov. 2025, doi: 10.1162/euso.a.34.

Y. Chen, “The political logic and practical dilemmas of Hungary’s immigration policy,” Adv. Soc. Behav. Res., vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 11–15, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.54254/2753-7102/2025.30356.

B. Nagy, “Hungarian Asylum Law and Policy in 2015–2016: Securitization Instead of Loyal Cooperation,” Ger. Law J., vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 1033–1082, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.1017/S2071832200021581.

M. Metawe, “Populism and domestic/international politics: theory and practice,” Rev. Econ. Polit. Sci., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 194–211, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1108/REPS-11-2019-0146.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2026-09-17

How to Cite

[1]
E. Nurdiansyah, A. Maksum, M. R. Bustami, and D. Suhaimi, “The Impact of Hungarian Anti-Immigrant Policies on the Decline of Refugee Inflows 2015–2020”, J.Gen.Educ.Humanit., vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 6273–6286, Sep. 2026.

Issue

Section

Articles