Mapping Students’ Creative Thinking in Geometry: A Cognitive Style-Based Needs Analysis

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v5i2.1310

Authors

  • Hendri Handoko Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • St Budi Waluya Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Wardono Wardono Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Sugiman Sugiman Universitas Negeri Semarang

Keywords:

Cognitive Styles, Creative Thinking, Field Dependent, Field Independent, Geometry Learning, Needs Analysis

Abstract

Creative thinking is a key objective in geometry learning, yet prior studies have focused more on instructional interventions than on students’ initial profiles. This study aims to map students’ creative thinking in geometry and examine its variation across cognitive styles. A descriptive survey with comparative analysis was conducted involving 62 undergraduate students at UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon. Creative thinking was measured using the Creative Thinking in Geometry Test (CTGT), covering fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration, while cognitive styles were classified into Field Independent (FI) and Field Dependent (FD). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and independent samples t-tests. The results indicate uneven performance across the dimensions, with fluency the highest and originality the lowest. Most students demonstrated moderate levels of creative thinking. FI students performed significantly better in fluency, flexibility, and originality than FD students, while no significant difference was found in elaboration. These findings suggest that cognitive style influences students’ engagement with geometry tasks and highlight the importance of identifying students’ initial profiles to inform instructional design.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

R. Maskur, Y. Rahmawati, K. Pradana, M. Syazali, A. Septian, and E. K. Palupi, “The effectiveness of problem based learning and aptitude treatment interaction in improving mathematical creative thinking skills on curriculum 2013,” Eur. J. Educ. Res., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 375–383, 2020. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.1.375

E. Susanto, R. Susanti, and S. Somakim, “Analyzing Educational Needs for PMRI-Based Instructional Videos: Addressing Fraction Division Challenges in Elementary Mathematics,” J. Innov. Res. Prim. Educ., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 3952–3962, 2025. https://doi.org/10.56916/jirpe.v4i4.2544

S. Gargrish, A. Mantri, and D. P. Kaur, “Augmented reality-based learning environment to enhance teaching-learning experience in geometry education,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 172, pp. 1039–1046, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.152

M. B. Ibáñez, A. U. Portillo, R. Z. Cabada, and M. L. Barrón, Impact of augmented reality technology on academic achievement and motivation of students from public and private Mexican schools. A case study in a middle-school geometry course,” Comput. Educ., vol. 145, p. 103734, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103734

E. Tursynkulova, N. Madiyarov, T. Sultanbek, and P. Duysebayeva, “The effect of problem-based learning on cognitive skills in solving geometric construction problems: a case study in Kazakhstan,” in Frontiers in Education, Frontiers Media SA, 2023, p. 1284305. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1284305

A. Saleh, T. M. Phillips, C. E. Hmelo‐Silver, K. D. Glazewski, B. W. Mott, and J. C. Lester, “A learning analytics approach towards understanding collaborative inquiry in a problem‐based learning environment,” Br. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 1321–1342, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13198

C.-Y. Chang, Z. Du, H.-C. Kuo, and C.-C. Chang, “Investigating the impact of design thinking-based STEAM PBL on students’ creativity and computational thinking,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 673–681, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2023.3297221

M. D. W. Ernawati, E. F. S. Rini, F. T. Aldila, T. Haryati, and R. Perdana, “Do Creative Thinking Skills in Problem-based Learning Benefit from Scaffolding?.,” J. Turkish Sci. Educ., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 399–417, 2023. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2023.023

M. I. Simeon, M. A. Samsudin, and N. Yakob, “Effect of design thinking approach on students’ achievement in some selected physics concepts in the context of STEM learning,” Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 185–212, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09601-1

I. Ndungo, S. Balimuttajjo, and E. Akugizibwe, “Towards Improved Geometry Instruction: Learners’ Experiences with Technology-Enhanced and Conventional Van Hiele Phased Instruction,” Electron. J. Res. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 33–56, 2025. https://ejrsme.icrsme.com/issue/view/1709

M. A. Alkhateeb and A. M. Al-Duwairi, “The Effect of Using Mobile Applications (GeoGebra and Sketchpad) on the Students’ Achievement.,” Int. Electron. J. Math. Educ., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 523–533, 2019. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5754

E. Machisi, “Van Hiele theory-based instruction and Grade 11 students’ geometric proof competencies,” Contemp. Math. Sci. Educ., 2021. https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/9682

G. Sunzuma, “Technology Integration in Geometry Teaching and Learning: A Systematic Review (2010-2022).,” LUMAT Int. J. Math, Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1–18, 2023. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.11.3.1938

D. Salim Nahdi and M. Gilar Jatisunda, “Conceptual understanding and procedural knowledge: A case study on learning mathematics of fractional material in elementary school,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, IOP Publishing, 2020, p. 42037. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1477/4/042037

N. Planas, C. Morgan, and M. Schütte, “Mathematics education and language: Lessons and directions from two decades of research,” Dev. Res. Math. Educ., pp. 196–210, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0726-9

M. Applebaum, “Enhancing critical thinking in pre-service mathematics teachers: Bridging procedural fluency and conceptual understanding,” Математика плюс, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 58–66, 2024. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=1276653

M. N. Hassan, A. H. Abdullah, and N. Ismail, “Effects of Integrative Interventions With Van Hiele Phase on Students’ Geometric Thinking: a Systematic Review,” J. Crit. Rev., vol. 7, no. 13, pp. 1133–1140, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.13.194

S. Uge, A. Neolaka, and M. Yasin, “Development of Social Studies Learning Model Based on Local Wisdom in Improving Students’ Knowledge and Social Attitude,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 12, pp. 375–388, Jul. 2019, https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12323a

S. C. Mahlaba and V. Mudaly, “Exploring the relationship between commognition and the Van Hiele theory for studying problem-solving discourse in Euclidean geometry education,” Pythagoras, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2022. https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v43i1.659

J. Buckley, N. Seery, and D. Canty, “Investigating the use of spatial reasoning strategies in geometric problem solving,” Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 341–362, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9446-3

T. Lowrie, T. Logan, and M. Hegarty, “The influence of spatial visualization training on students’ spatial reasoning and mathematics performance,” J. Cogn. Dev., vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 729–751, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2019.1653298

X. Li and W. Wang, “Exploring spatial cognitive process among STEM students and its role in STEM education: A cognitive neuroscience perspective,” Sci. Educ., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 121–145, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00167-x

R. Idris, P. Govindasamy, S. Nachiappan, and J. Bacotang, “Exploring the impact of cognitive factors on learning, motivation, and career in Malaysia’s STEM education,” Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci., vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1669–1684, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i6/17227

J. Nilimaa, “New examination approach for real-world creativity and problem-solving skills in mathematics,” Trends High. Educ., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 477–495, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/higheredu2030028

I. S. Wardhani, T. Nusantara, I. N. Parta, and H. Permadi, “The Model of Geometry Learning With Spatial Skills Features: Is It Possible?,” J. High. Educ. Theory Pract., vol. 23, no. 14, 2023. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v23i14.6397

M. De Villiers, “Some reflections on the van Hiele theory,” in Invited plenary from 4th Congress of teachers of mathematics, 2010, pp. 30–31.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

[1]
H. Handoko, S. B. Waluya, W. Wardono, and S. Sugiman, “Mapping Students’ Creative Thinking in Geometry: A Cognitive Style-Based Needs Analysis”, J.Gen.Educ.Humanit., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 2963–2978, Apr. 2026.

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): April

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of General Education and Humanities

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.