Evaluating Professional Development for Islamic Education Teachers in Palembang, Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v5i2.1281Keywords:
Islamic education teachers, Teacher professional development, CIPP evaluation model, Program evaluation, Mixed methods research, Teacher competenceAbstract
This study evaluates the effectiveness of a professional development program for Islamic education teachers organized by the Palembang City Government, Indonesia. Despite the growing number of teacher-training initiatives, empirical evaluations of programs specifically designed for Islamic education teachers remain limited, particularly at the local government level. Therefore, this study aims to examine the program’s effectiveness in improving teachers’ competencies using the Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) evaluation framework. The study employed a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design. Quantitative data were collected through questionnaires from 66 Islamic education teachers, while qualitative data were obtained through interviews, observations, and document analysis. The quantitative results indicate very high levels of agreement across all CIPP components: 94.53% for context evaluation, 95.53% for input, 97.02% for process, and 98.51% for product evaluation. The findings also indicate improvements in teachers’ professional, pedagogical, personality, and social competencies after participating in the program. These results suggest that the program effectively enhances teachers’ instructional capacity and supports improvements in the quality of Islamic education. This study provides empirical evidence on the effectiveness of local government-led professional development programs and contributes to the application of the CIPP evaluation model in Islamic education policy contexts.
Downloads
References
L. Darling-Hammond, M. E. Hyler, and M. Gardner, “Effective teacher professional development: A research review of evidence-based practices,” Educ. Res., vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2020, doi: 10.3102/0013189X20908471.
B. Avalos, “Teacher professional development in teaching and teacher education over ten years,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 105, p. 103432, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2021.103432.
V. D. Opfer and D. Pedder, “Conceptualizing teacher professional learning,” Rev. Educ. Res., vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 1–36, 2021, doi: 10.3102/0034654320969176.
L. M. Desimone and M. S. Garet, “Best practices in teachers’ professional development,” Psychol. Soc. Educ., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 1–13, 2020, doi: 10.25115/psye.v12i3.3698.
P. Cordingley et al., “Developing great teaching: Lessons from the international reviews into effective professional development,” Teach. Dev., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2020, doi: 10.1080/13664530.2019.1692133.
U. Salamah and E. Istiyono, “Evaluation of teacher professional training program using the CIPP model,” J. Penelit. dan Eval. Pendidik., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 189–202, 2022, doi: 10.21831/pep.v26i2.43978.
J. M. Khofifah, D. Nurdin, and E. Herawan, “Enhancing teacher professionalism through academic supervision: A CIPP model evaluation,” Indones. J. Educ. Dev., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 380–392, 2025, doi: 10.59672/ijed.v6i2.4727.
D. L. Stufflebeam and C. L. S. Coryn, Evaluation theory, models, and applications (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass, 2021.
S. Suri and N. Hariyati, “CIPP evaluation model in educational evaluation: A literature study,” Cahaya Pendidik., vol. 10, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.33373/chypend.v10i1.5950.
F. Hilmiyati, T. E. Panggabean, R. N. Khoirunnisa, D. Dewanto, M. S. Siregar, and T. A. Santosa, “The effectiveness of the CIPP evaluation model in science learning: A meta-analysis study,” J. Obs., vol. 8, no. 6, 2024, doi: 10.31004/obsesi.v8i6.6227.
S. Yusuf, R. Rustam, and T. Andriani, “Meta-analysis of curriculum evaluation models (CIPP, Stake, Scriven) for improving learning quality,” J. Tawadhu, vol. 9, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.52802/twd.v9i1.1423.
A. Taufiq, “The use of the CIPP model in evaluating Islamic education programs,” J. Contemp. Islam. Educ., vol. 3, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.25217/jcie.v3i1.4225.
U. Usman, C. Wijaya, and M. Dalimunte, “Evaluation of teacher quality improvement training using the CIPP model,” J. Eval. Educ., vol. 6, no. 4, 2024, doi: 10.37251/jee.v6i4.2232.
F. E. Saputra, N. Mutamin, W. Oktaviani, U. Y. Hasanah, and D. Susanti, “Evaluation of teacher learning community programs using the CIPP model,” Indones. Res. J. Educ., vol. 9, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.22437/irje.v9i01.33584.
F. Fairuz, D. H. Suwiryo, and E. Sunarya, “Evaluation of teacher empowerment programs using the CIPP model,” SIBATIK J., vol. 3, no. 4, 2024, doi: 10.54443/sibatik.v3i4.1872.
J. A. Habibullah, I. Norvaizi, and D. E. C. Dewi, “Implementation of mixed methods in educational research,” Perad. J. Interdiscip. Educ. Res., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2024, doi: 10.59001/pjier.v3i1.245.
I. K. Sari, L. Kasmini, R. Rosdiana, and M. M. H. Manurung, “The online evaluation of the teacher certification program using the CIPP model,” J. Penelit. dan Eval. Pendidik., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 164–176, 2023, doi: 10.21831/pep.v27i2.57914.
D. I. Wadu and B. Ismanto, “CIPP evaluation model in educational program assessment,” J. Penelit. dan Eval. Pendidik., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 185–196, 2021, doi: 10.21831/pep.v25i2.43730.
M. Philipsen, J. Tondeur, K. Pareja Roblin, S. Vanslambrouck, and C. Zhu, “Improving teacher professional development for online and blended learning: A systematic meta-aggregative review,” Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., vol. 67, pp. 1145–1174, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11423-019-09645-8.
K. Vangrieken, F. Dochy, E. Raes, and E. Kyndt, “Teacher collaboration: A systematic review,” Educ. Res. Rev., vol. 15, pp. 17–40, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2015.04.002.
J. Hattie, “Visible learning: The impact of teacher professional development on student achievement,” Educ. Psychol. Rev., vol. 33, pp. 1–28, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10648-020-09535-2.
T. Trust and D. G. Whalen, “Should teachers be trained in emergency remote teaching? Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic,” J. Technol. Teach. Educ., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 189–199, 2020.
C. Dede, A. Eisenkraft, K. Frumin, and J. Hartley, “Challenges of practice-based professional development,” Educ. Res., vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 1–11, 2021, doi: 10.3102/0013189X211000977.
A. Hargreaves and M. Fullan, “Professional capital after the pandemic: Revisiting and revising classic understandings of teachers’ work,” J. Prof. Cap. Community, vol. 5, no. 3–4, pp. 327–336, 2020, doi: 10.1108/JPCC-06-2020-0039.
J. Tondeur, R. Scherer, F. Siddiq, and E. Baran, “A comprehensive framework for teachers’ digital competence in education,” Comput. Educ., vol. 162, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104080.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of General Education and Humanities

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Rahmawati Rahmawati, Abd. Kamaruddin, Maf’ulah Maf’ulah, Mochtar Marhum, The Effectiveness of Educational Videos in Improving Vocabulary Mastery at SMP Negeri 16 Palu , Journal of General Education and Humanities: Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): February
- Riza Kurnia, Saipul Annur, Afriantoni Afriantoni, Yuniar Yuniar, Digital Smart Classroom Integration: Enhancing Student Learning Motivation and Pedagogical Dynamics , Journal of General Education and Humanities: Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): February
- M. Aditya Salam, Saipul Annur, Afriantoni Afriantoni, Change Management in Faith-Based University Transformation: A Case Study of Aisyiyah Higher Education , Journal of General Education and Humanities: Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): February
- Rohani Rohani, Yuniar Yuniar, Mardiah Astuti, Ahmad Zainuri, Innovative School Leadership and Digital Literacy of Islamic Education Teachers , Journal of General Education and Humanities: Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): February
















