Digital Smart Classroom Integration: Enhancing Student Learning Motivation and Pedagogical Dynamics

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v5i1.1057

Authors

  • Riza Kurnia Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang
  • Saipul Annur Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang
  • Afriantoni Afriantoni Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang
  • Yuniar Yuniar Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang

Keywords:

CIPP model, Digital transformation, Learning motivation, Madrasah, Smart classroom

Abstract

This study evaluates the implementation of the Digital Smart Classroom program at MAN 3 Palembang using the CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) evaluation model. The research is driven by the disparity between rapid technological infrastructure expansion and educators' actual pedagogical readiness. Employing a qualitative-dominant mixed-methods approach, data were gathered through in-depth interviews with 18 key informants, participatory observations, and questionnaires distributed to 72 respondents. The findings reveal that while the Context and Input phases show strong institutional alignment and infrastructure readiness (score 3.70–3.90), teacher digital pedagogical competence remains a critical bottleneck (score 3.60). Process evaluation indicates that digital transformation has successfully fostered an active learning environment (score 4.05), although it is frequently hindered by network stability issues (score 3.45). Ultimately, the Product evaluation demonstrates that the program significantly enhances student motivation and satisfaction, placing it in the "Very Good" category (score 4.21). The study concludes that successful digital transformation in madrasahs necessitates a strategic shift from hardware-oriented procurement to sustainable human resource development, with a focus on innovative digital pedagogical strategies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

D. L. Stufflebeam and C. L. S. Coryn, Evaluation Theory, Models, and Applications, 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2014.

A. T. Sugeng and R. Rahmawati, "Digital Transformation in Indonesian Madrasahs: Challenges and Opportunities," Journal of Digital Education and Learning, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 88-102, 2024.

J. W. Creswell and V. L. Plano Clark, Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2017.

S. Annur and Afriantoni, "Management of Educational Innovation in Islamic Institutions," Journal of Islamic Education Management, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 45-60, 2023.

M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldaña, Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, 4th ed. Arizona State University: SAGE Publications, 2018.

S. Safaruddin and A. Afriantoni, "Technological Challenges in Islamic Education Management," Indonesian Journal of Islamic Education, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 55-70, 2024.

E. S. Mulyani, "Implementation of CIPP Model in Evaluating E-Learning Programs," International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 120-135, 2021.

R. H. Huang et al., "The Impact of Smart Classrooms on Student Engagement: A Systematic Review," Smart Learning Environments, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1-15, 2019.

P. Mishra and M. J. Koehler, "Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge," Teachers College Record, vol. 108, no. 6, pp. 1017-1054, 2006.

D. L. Stufflebeam, "The CIPP Model for Evaluation," in International Handbook of Educational Evaluation, Dordrecht: Springer, 2003, pp. 31-62.

S. Annur and R. Rahmawati, "Structural Barriers in Madrasah Digital Transformation: A Top-Down Policy Analysis," Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 145-160, 2023.

H. S. S. Al-Dhuhoori and M. S. Khalid, "Evaluating Smart Classroom Infrastructure using CIPP Model," Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1830, no. 1, 2021.

S. Annur, "Strategic Management of Madrasah Education Quality in the Era of Industrial Revolution 4.0," Jurnal Intelektualitas, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 201-215, 2020.

F. D. Davis, "Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology," MIS Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319-340, 1989.

V. Venkatesh et al., "User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View," MIS Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 425-478, 2003.

Z. S. Jamil and M. R. Ruslan, "E-Learning Adoption in Religious Schools: A Mixed Method Study," Educational Media International, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 210-228, 2021.

B. Means et al., Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, 2010.

N. Selwyn, "Digital Downside: Exploring the Socio-Technical Challenges of Educational Technology," British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 1514-1525, 2020.

R. Luckin et al., Intelligence Unleashed: An Argument for AI in Education, London: Pearson Education, 2016.

M. Warschauer, Learning in the Cloud: How Digital Tools are Transforming Education, New York: Teachers College Press, 2011.

G. Siemens, "Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age," International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 3-10, 2005.

Afriantoni and S. Annur, Manajemen Pendidikan dan Inovasi Pembelajaran, Palembang: NoerFikri, 2022.

T. L. Friedman, The World is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2005.

A. J. S. Moore, "Competency-Based Learning in Digital Environments," Journal of Educational Computing Research, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 712-735, 2021.

J. Hattie, Visible Learning for Teachers: Maximizing Impact on Learning, London: Routledge, 2012.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2026-01-29

How to Cite

[1]
R. Kurnia, S. Annur, A. Afriantoni, and Y. Yuniar, “Digital Smart Classroom Integration: Enhancing Student Learning Motivation and Pedagogical Dynamics”, J.Gen.Educ.Humanit., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1005–1016, Jan. 2026.

Issue

Section

Articles