Students’ Perceptions of Effective TEFL Instructors in Cambodian Higher Education Institutions

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v2i3.117

Authors

Keywords:

Qualifications, Content Knowledge, Pedagogical Knowledge , Instructors Characteristics , TEFL

Abstract

English language as a medium of instruction has been popular under globalization. English is now a popular medium of instruction and a major subject in Cambodia because most higher education institutions (HEIs) have adopted it as a common language for a learning curriculum. However, teaching English effectively has also been a concern in Cambodia because learners are not proficient or fluent in English. Moreover, most English classes have been taught by fresh graduates with little English teaching experience, and some instructors even teach subjects not in their field. Therefore, this study surveyed 265 year-4 TEFL students at three universities by asking them to rate their instructors’ teaching effectiveness. Instructors’ qualifications, content knowledge, pedagogical knowledge, pedagogical skills, and personal and interpersonal characteristics are used to examine students’ perceptions of effective TEFL instructors. The study showed higher percentages of students’ positive perceptions of the five domains of effective TEFL instructors. The findings are also consistent with the results of previous studies, suggesting that these qualities and characteristics should be must-have criteria for TEFL instructors in higher education. Thus, educational institutions should create certain criteria for selecting qualified university instructors. The findings can help the institutions develop human resources with these quality aspects or elements when selecting effective English language instructors. HEIs can use these criteria based on the results of this study, while TEFL instructors need to develop or improve themselves to have these qualities and other attributes for English teaching.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

W. Tsou and S.-M. Kao, “Overview of EMI Development : English as a Medium of Instruction in Higher Education: Implementations and Classroom Practices in Taiwan,” W. Tsou and S.-M. Kao, Eds. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2017, pp. 3–18.

D. Crystal, English as a Global Language. Cambridge University Press, 2003.

J. Melitz, “English as a Global Language,” in The Palgrave Handbook of Economics and Language, London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2016, pp. 583–615.

S. R. Parupalli, “The Role of English as a Global Language,” Res. J. English, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 64–79, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334282978%0ATHE%0Awww.rjoe.org.in.

D. Boyd, H. Lankford, S. Loeb, and J. Wyckoff, “Explaining the Short Careers of High-Achieving Teachers in Schools with Low-Performing Students,” Am. Econ. Rev., vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 166–171, Apr. 2005, doi: 10.1257/000282805774669628.

D. J. Letourneau, “Teacher Leadership: Perceptions of Teachers, Administrators, and Teacher Leaders in an Urban District Regarding Effective Practice and the Kansas Teacher Leader Standards,” Baker University, 2012.

D. Goldhaber, “The Mystery of Good Teaching,” 2006. https://www.educationnext.org/the-mystery-of-good-teaching/ (accessed Jun. 07, 2023).

J. L. Foreman and E. J. Gubbins, “Teachers See What Ability Scores Cannot,” J. Adv. Acad., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 5–23, Feb. 2015, doi: 10.1177/1932202X14552279.

K. Sey and S. Em, “Attitudes and Perceptions of Using Zoom: A Survey of Cambodian University Students,” J. As-Salam, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2023, doi: 10.37249/assalam.v7i1.511.

K. Sey, “E-readiness of Cambodian Undergraduate Students in Using Google Classroom,” Cambodian J. Educ. Res., vol. 1, no. 2, p. 87 95, 2021.

H. C. Hill, B. Rowan, and D. L. Ball, “Effects of Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching on Student Achievement,” Am. Educ. Res. J., vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 371–406, Jan. 2005, doi: 10.3102/00028312042002371.

J. C. Dial, “The effect of teacher experience and teacher degree levels on student achievement in mathematics and communication arts,” f Baker University, 2008.

L. Shulman, “Knowledge and Teaching:Foundations of the New Reform,” Harv. Educ. Rev., vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 1–23, Apr. 1987, doi: 10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411.

J. H. van Driel, N. Verloop, and W. de Vos, “Developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 673–695, Aug. 1998, doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199808)35:6<673::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-J.

S. Engelmann and D. Carnine, Theory of instruction: Principles and applications. Oregon: NIFDI PRESS, 2016.

G.-P. Park and H.-W. Lee, “The characteristics of effective english teachers as perceived by high school teachers and students in Korea,” Asia Pacific Educ. Rev., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 236–248, Dec. 2006, doi: 10.1007/BF03031547.

A. Arıkan, D. Taser, and H. S. Saraç-Süzer, “The Effective English Language Teacher from the Perspectives of Turkish Preparatory School Students,” 2008.

T. G, “As teachers we are evaluating our students constantly: Have you ever thought about how our students are evaluated?,” Çağdaş Eğitim, vol. 14, pp. 27–30, 1989.

N. Büyükkantarcioglu, “A sociolinguistic analysis of the present dimensions of English as a foreign language in Turkey,” Int. J. Soc. Lang., vol. 2004, no. 165, Jan. 2004, doi: 10.1515/ijsl.2004.006.

J. Pettis, “Developing Our Professional Competence: Some Reflections,” in Methodology in Language Teaching, Cambridge University Press, 2002, pp. 393–396.

H. B. Shishavan and K. Sadeghi, “Characteristics of an Effective English Language Teacher as Perceived by Iranian Teachers and Learners of English,” English Lang. Teach., vol. 2, no. 4, Nov. 2009, doi: 10.5539/elt.v2n4p130.

S. Celik, “Characteristics and Competencies for Teacher Educators: Addressing the Need for Improved Professional Standards in Turkey,” Aust. J. Teach. Educ., vol. 36, no. 4, Jan. 2011, doi: 10.14221/ajte.2011v36n4.3.

E. Petraki and K. Khat, “Challenges and constraints in the design of an ESP course in Cambodia: implications for higher education institutions,” Asia Pacific J. Educ., vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 260–275, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1080/02188791.2020.1798738.

S. Sajjad, “Effective Teaching Methods at Higher Education Level,” 2011, Accessed: Jun. 07, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.schoollearningresources.com/PDF/_1.Effectiveteachingmethodsathighereducationlevel.pdf.

R. V. Krejcie and D. W. Morgan, “Determining Sample Size for Research Activities,” Educ. Psychol. Meas., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 607–610, Sep. 1970, doi: 10.1177/001316447003000308.

F. Lunenburg and B. Irby, Writing a Successful Thesis or Dissertation: Tips and Strategies for Students in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2590 Conejo Spectrum, Thousand Oaks California 91320 United States: Corwin Press, 2008.

H. Brosh, “Perceived Characteristics of the Effective Language Teacher,” Foreign Lang. Ann., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 125–136, May 1996, doi: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.1996.tb02322.x.

F. M. Calabria, “Characteristics of Effective Teachers,” Educ. Res. Bull., vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 92–100, 1960.

K. A. Feldman, “The superior college teacher from the students’ view,” Res. High. Educ., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 243–288, 1976, doi: 10.1007/BF00991967.

K. A. Feldman, “Effective college teaching from the students’ and faculty’s view: Matched or mismatched priorities?,” Res. High. Educ., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 291–329, 1988, doi: 10.1007/BF01006402.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-24

How to Cite

[1]
V. Nourn, “Students’ Perceptions of Effective TEFL Instructors in Cambodian Higher Education Institutions”, J.Gen.Educ.Humanit., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 209–218, Jun. 2023.

Issue

Section

Articles