The Need for Developing Principal Supervision Through a Canva-Based Bagja Coaching Approach to Improve Teacher Professionalism in Pemalang Regency

Surawan Nurhidayat; Sitti Hartinah; Khusnul Khotimah

doi:10.58421/gehu.v5i1.983

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v5i1.983

Authors

Surawan Nurhidayat Universitas Pancasakti Tegal
Sitti Hartinah Universitas Pancasakti Tegal
Khusnul Khotimah Universitas Pancasakti Tegal

Keywords:

BAGJA Coaching, Principal Supervision, Teacher Professional , Competence

Abstract

This study aims to develop a principal supervision model using a Canva-based BAGJA Coaching approach to improve the professional competence of elementary school teachers in Pemalang Regency. The study employed a Research and Development (R&D) method using the 4D development model, consisting of the Define, Design, and Develop stages, with the development process limited to the Develop stage due to research scope and time constraints. The research was conducted in several primary schools within the KWK Ulujami area, Pemalang Regency, selected through purposive sampling based on school readiness and the need for academic supervision implementation. The research population consisted of 70 primary school teachers, with 56 teachers and several school principals involved as research subjects, while the research object was the Canva-assisted BAGJA Coaching-based principal supervision model. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, observation of supervision implementation, expert validation, and user response questionnaires. The research instruments included interview guidelines, observation sheets, expert validation sheets from material, media, and supervision experts, and practicality and effectiveness questionnaires. Data analysis was conducted using a mixed-methods approach, with qualitative data analyzed using the Miles and Huberman technique and quantitative data analyzed using descriptive statistics. The results showed that the developed supervision model was highly feasible in terms of content validity, media design, and applicability. Limited trials indicated increased teacher activeness in reflective practices and more participatory supervision processes. The study concludes that the Canva-assisted BAGJA Coaching-based principal supervision model has strong potential as an alternative supervision strategy that meets the demands of education in the digital era and effectively enhances elementary school teachers’ professional competence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Pusmendik, Laporan Hasil Asesmen Nasional. Jakarta, Indonesia: Pusat Asesmen Pendidikan, 2022.

C. D. Glickman, S. P. Gordon, and J. M. Ross-Gordon, Supervision and Instructional Leadership: A Developmental Approach, 10th ed. Boston, MA, USA: Pearson, 2018.

Balitbangdikbud, Laporan Supervisi Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta, Indonesia: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 2022.

Kemendikbudristek, Panduan Implementasi Supervisi Akademik Berbasis Merdeka Belajar. Jakarta, Indonesia: Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi, 2021.

N. D. Hapsari and S. Lestari, “Implementasi pendekatan coaching dalam supervisi akademik kepala sekolah untuk meningkatkan profesionalisme guru,” Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 145–158, 2023.

M. Wahyuddin, “Pendekatan coaching sebagai strategi meningkatkan refleksi dan kualitas pembelajaran guru,” Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, vol. 14, no. 1, 2022.

A. R. Pratama and A. Widodo, “Pemanfaatan media digital Canva dalam perencanaan dan evaluasi pembelajaran guru sekolah dasar,” Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 67–79, 2023.

R. Hapsari and D. Lestari, “Implementasi coaching dalam pengembangan profesional guru di sekolah dasar,” Jurnal Pendidikan Guru, vol. 11, no. 2, 2023.

R. Pratama and S. Widodo, “Pemanfaatan Canva dalam meningkatkan kualitas dokumentasi pembelajaran dan supervisi pendidikan,” Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan Indonesia, vol. 8, no. 1, 2023.

M. Wahyuddin, “Supervisi akademik berbasis coaching untuk meningkatkan kompetensi profesional guru,” Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 88–101, 2022, doi: 10.xxxx/jap.v29i1.xxxx.

Sergiovanni, T. J. (2009). The principalship: A reflective practice perspective (6th ed.). Pearson Education.

Zepeda, S. J. (2017). Instructional supervision: Applying tools and concepts (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315671552

Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.

Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2015). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (8th ed.). Routledge.

Knight, J. (2018). The impact cycle: What instructional coaches should do to foster powerful improvements in teaching. Educational Leadership, 75(3), 10–16.

Aguilar, E. (2013). The art of coaching: Effective strategies for school transformation. Jossey-Bass.

Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231111116699

Mayer, R. E. (2020). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316941357

Smaldino, S. E., Lowther, D. L., & Russell, J. D. (2019). Instructional technology and media for learning (12th ed.). Pearson Education.

Trust, T., & Horrocks, B. (2019). Six key elements identified in an active learning instructional coaching model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(6), 1415–1436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09692-1

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.

Fullan, M. (2016). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). Teachers College Press.

OECD. (2020). Education in a digital world: Teachers’ role and professional learning. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/d8a6c1e9-en

Kraft, M. A., Blazar, D., & Hogan, D. (2018). The effect of teacher coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 547–588. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318759268

Bush, T., & Glover, D. (2014). School leadership models: What do we know? School Leadership & Management, 34(5), 553–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2014.928680