The Use of ChatGPT-Based Interactive Exercises to Improve Students’ Vocabulary Mastery

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v5i1.932

Authors

  • Miftahul Jannah Universitas Tadulako
  • Mashuri Mashuri Universitas Tadulako
  • Andi Patmasari Universitas Tadulako
  • Mochtar Marhum Universitas Tadulako

Keywords:

ChatGPT, Interactive Exercises, Vocabulary Improvement, Junior High School, Vocabulary Mastery

Abstract

This study investigates the use of ChatGPT-based interactive exercises to improve eighth-grade students’ vocabulary mastery at SMP Astra Makmur Jaya. The research employed a quantitative, quasi-experimental design with an experimental and a control group. Students’ vocabulary mastery was measured through pre-test and post-test scores, focusing on two aspects: meaning and use. The experimental group received six sessions of ChatGPT-based, collaborative, small-group interactive exercises, while the control group was instructed through traditional textbook-based methods. The results showed that ChatGPT-based interactive exercises significantly improved students’ vocabulary mastery. The experimental group's post-test score improved to 82.32, while the control group's average score was 70.53. Further statistical analysis revealed that the t-counted value (3.92) was higher than the t-table value (2.008), indicating a significant difference between the two groups. These findings indicate that ChatGPT-based interactive exercises effectively improve students’ vocabulary mastery by providing contextual practice, immediate feedback, and increased student engagement. Therefore, the findings indicate that ChatGPT can serve as an effective learning tool to improve students’ vocabulary mastery.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

N. Schmitt, “Understanding vocabulary acquisition, instruction, and assessment: A research agenda,” Language Teaching, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 261–274, 2019.

I. S. P. Nation, Learning Vocabulary in Another Language, 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022. doi: DOI: 10.1017/9781009093873.

S. Webb, “The Routledge Handbook of Vocabulary Studies.” [Online]. Available: www.routledge.com/series/RHIL

S. Thornbury, Scott Thornbury’s 30 language teaching methods Google EBook: Cambridge handbooks for language teachers. Cambridge University Press, 2017.

J. Harmer, “The practice of English language teaching,” London/New York, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 401–405, 2001.

E. Hatch and C. Brown, Vocabulary, semantics, and language education. ERIC, 1995.

Kemendikbudristek BSKAP, Kemendikbudristek BSKAP, no. 021. 2022.

A. F. Alqahtani, “The Relationship between the Saudi Cadets’ Learning Motivation and Their Vocabulary Knowledge,” English Language Teaching, vol. 13, no. 4, p. 1, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.5539/elt.v13n4p1.

M. Ilham, F. Rahman, D. D. Sari, and A. Annisaturrahmi, “Enhancing Preschool English Vocabulary Through Multimedia Tools: Insights from a Mixed-Methods Study,” Al-Athfal: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 93–102, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.14421/al-athfal.2023.92-02.

A. G. D. Perkasa, N. Lubis, R. F. Putri, and T. S. Amin, “Tertiary students’ perception of mobile legend game on Vocabulary Mastery,” Indonesian Journal of ELT and Applied Linguistics (IJEAL), vol. 1, no. 2, 2022.

G. Kessler, “Technology and the future of language teaching,” Foreign Lang Ann, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 205–218, 2018.

X. Zhai, “Chatgpt and ai: The game changer for education,” Zhai, X.(2023). ChatGPT: Reforming Education on Five Aspects. Shanghai Education, pp. 16–17, 2023.

A. I. Mugableh, “The impact of ChatGPT on the development of vocabulary knowledge of Saudi EFL students,” Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on ChatGPT, 2024.

I. Kurniawan, “A Narrative Review of Teaching Vocabulary Through Videos: Insights and Strategies for Young Learners,” English Education: Jurnal Tadris Bahasa Inggris, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 397–406, 2024.

A. Nugroho, N. H. P. S. Putro, and K. Syamsi, “The potentials of ChatGPT for language learning: Unpacking its benefits and limitations,” Register Journal, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 224–247, 2023.

T. Ngo, “The use of ChatGPT for vocabulary acquisition: A literature review,” Available at SSRN 5059052, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5059052

J. Belda-Medina and J. R. Calvo-Ferrer, “Using chatbots as AI conversational partners in language learning,” Applied Sciences, vol. 12, no. 17, p. 8427, 2022.

Lucas Kohnke, Benjamin Luke Moorhouse, and Di Zou, “ChatGPT for Language Teaching and Learning,” RELC Journal, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 537–550, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1177/00336882231162868.

Shahdid Siswanto, Akhmad Ali Mirza, and Zaitun Qamariah, “The Effect of Using ChatGPT as a Learning Technology on EFL Students’ Vocabulary Mastery,” Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Bahasa, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 600–611, May 2025, doi: 10.55606/jurribah.v4i1.5193.

B. I. Aldowsari and S. G. Aljebreen, “The Impact of Using a ChatGPT-based application to Enhance Saudi Students’ EFL Vocabulary Learning,” International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 380–397, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.36892/ijlls.v6i4.1955.

J. W. Creswell and J. D. Creswell, Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications, 2017.

S. Arikunto, “Prosedur penelitian tindakan kelas,” Bumi aksara, vol. 136, no. 2, pp. 2–3, 2006.

F. A. Setiawati, “Statistika Terapan: Untuk Penelitian Pendidikan dan Sosial,” Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing, 2017.

M. Swain, “The output hypothesis: Theory and research,” in Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, Routledge, 2005, pp. 471–483.

M. S. Smith, “Input Enhancement in Instructed SLA: Theoretical Bases,” Stud Second Lang Acquis, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 165–179, 1993, doi: DOI: 10.1017/S0272263100011943.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2025-12-29

How to Cite

[1]
M. Jannah, M. Mashuri, A. Patmasari, and M. Marhum, “The Use of ChatGPT-Based Interactive Exercises to Improve Students’ Vocabulary Mastery ”, J.Gen.Educ.Humanit., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 303–310, Dec. 2025.

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): February

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of General Education and Humanities

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 > >>